Thread: 8psi with a 3.2 normal???

revving to 6500 on stock rods is asking for trouble.

Limit that to 6200 or so unless thats just your transmission slipping.

Also try to limit your logging to just before and just after you go WOT. Its a bit much to scroll through.

In the first scan, are you sure your wideband is reading 10:1?

Your narrowbands are actually really low, even for an intercooled car.

I dont really understand how you're getting any knock at all unless its from being lean...

You should be able to drop to a lower pulley as well as run more timing.

I'd recalibrate your wideband and make sure the O2 sensor for it isn't nearly out of life and that you have no exhaust leaks.

It just seems like you're lacking fuel, boost and timing.

he needs to sort out his wideband first.

ok ill look into that calabration of the wb... the end of life i dought its brand new but what is life span's of wb o2 sensors? i figured that it was calabrated when cruzeing it bounces around 14ish to 15ish... so i figured it was accurate.. being it "avrages" 14.7ish.. if im not mistakeing you guys are saying narrow band is "reading low" from my understanding isnt that rich? or am i compleatly backwards? and i dont belive i have any exhaust leaks expecaly at a wot for the exhaust pressure i would guess would prevent air getting in causeing a fause lean reading... my nunarrow band is still in bank one(pre "cat") and wide band is in the post cat bung and i would guess if i had any considerable exhaust leaks i would see the wide band would show a higher number (lean avraget) than my narrowband. i dont want to sound like i know it all but PLEASE correct me if my logic is flawed... thanks for the input on the high rpm on stock rods didnt know... i have a post in the pcm tuneing section "stock ballancer" with my shift rpms and mph to show what i have currently but never got a responce to what was considered "abuse" to the engine/transmisson. thanks guys your input is awsome... the tuneing world is something i never got trained on.. so the logic is there but the do's and don't i am unshure of... i am a mechanic and know my way around fixing broken parts not the computer aspect.. lol

Are you running a cat?

http://wiki.opentuner3800.com/index.php?title=Main_Page

nope no cat... and pcm had had the o2 deleated as well as the cat test deleated. that wiki i have poked around thew but havent had the time to sit down and read... but still makeing some progress

the cat test is difficult to delete.

Thats the issue.

I dont know how you did it but i'd like to know.

paul with prj did it and he used tiny tuner... as far as what exactly he did i don't know... i am sure some where it is posted or can be found.. as for my narrow band and my wideband readings... i am looking at my first scan i see my narrow is reading high 800s and low 900's showing a extreamly rich condition right? and my narrow band will peg at 10.0 thus showing a extreamly rich condition at WOT... but if you look at the point where i am cruseing at 11% throttle at 62mph narrow is bouncing around but looks like makes 450MV the average thus being stoichiometric correct? and if my wideband is bouncing from 13's to 15's making about 14.7 the middle being stoichiometric wouldn't that make my wideband "calibrated"?

lower than that 905-915 because he's cammed as well.

will this be easyier if i posted my tune to see if some thing is WAAAAY off??