Thread: max revs on stock bottom end?

Results 1 to 20 of 35

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    troll land
    Posts
    1,018
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yeah and chevy was the last to get them. Its like saying a duramax is not a diesel cause its in a chev. After tearing apart a bunch of l67s i noticed the disassembly and design is nearly identical to my 231
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GTP Level Member Twizted 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Summertown Tn
    Posts
    640
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by l67ss View Post
    Yeah and chevy was the last to get them. Its like saying a duramax is not a diesel cause its in a chev. After tearing apart a bunch of l67s i noticed the disassembly and design is nearly identical to my 231

    Technically you and scotty are both off on your statements, since the mid/late 80's
    Pontiac, buick and the like hasn't designed any engines. GM took the market and designed all of the engines for their B*tch companies that built cars to make GM rich. Then later gave them an excuse to file bankruptcy.
    But the engines are specifically GM.
    Not chevy or buick. Im with scotty though, they are designed more like the Chevy minus two cylinders.

    And the duramax was designed by izuzu. Lol. Let's not attack that sh*tty subject

    Sent from Not so smart smartphone
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    troll land
    Posts
    1,018
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    DIESEL ENGINES WERE DESIGNED BY A MAN BY THE LAST NAME DIESEL. Troll attempt, fail. And what in the design aside from the lifters is more like a chevy? Are saying i can use the parts to tipswap a chevy. Or that i can use 4.3 parts to get eid of the external oil passage?
    Quote Originally Posted by Twizted 1 View Post
    Technically you and scotty are both off on your statements, since the mid/late 80's
    Pontiac, buick and the like hasn't designed any engines. GM took the market and designed all of the engines for their B*tch companies that built cars to make GM rich. Then later gave them an excuse to file bankruptcy.
    But the engines are specifically GM.
    Not chevy or buick. Im with scotty though, they are designed more like the Chevy minus two cylinders.

    And the duramax was designed by izuzu. Lol. Let's not attack that sh*tty subject

    Sent from Not so smart smartphone
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: max revs on stock bottom end? 
    GXP Level Member Turbocharged400sbc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    hangover park IL
    Posts
    2,714
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    11
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Twizted 1 View Post
    Technically you and scotty are both off on your statements, since the mid/late 80's
    Pontiac, buick and the like hasn't designed any engines. GM took the market and designed all of the engines for their B*tch companies that built cars to make GM rich. Then later gave them an excuse to file bankruptcy.
    But the engines are specifically GM.
    Not chevy or buick. Im with scotty though, they are designed more like the Chevy minus two cylinders.

    And the duramax was designed by izuzu. Lol. Let's not attack that sh*tty subject

    Sent from Not so smart smartphone
    sorry but its a buick...it shares no architecture with the sbc based "chevy" v6 aside from them both being split journal on center v6 engines
    it does however share every major component with its ancestors. you can bolt a 62 buick v6 head to an 09 SII...same bolt pattern...right down to the same 7/16ths threads in the cylinder deck.

    the LC3/LG3/LN3/L27/SI L67/ and the SII (L26/36 and L67/32 are all buick decendants...not a damn one of em is a "clean sheet" design....you dont think gm fired all their engine guys that were champions of the turbo buick...no they rolled them into developing the v6 further. lotta buick enthusiast in GM...

    plain point of this is that the 3800 is a direct buick v8/v6 descendant and shares little with the much younger chevy v6
    ~James~ Psychotic Gearhead
    projects: 84 Cressida waGN~ 90 LN3 3800, equal length headers, T70, 89 700r4, misc parts,
    1994 Oldsmobile 442 (462ci-4wd-2 engines) L67/4t80e^2,
    00 Turbo Regal 608 fwhp 575ftlbs at 5500rpm, 98 WhippledRiv, 97 GTP
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Replacing L67 bottom end for L26 bottom end
    By OcalaGTP in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-27-2013, 06:05 PM
  2. high revs as i start car
    By Jrs1987 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-05-2011, 06:28 PM
  3. Revs go up/not changing gears?
    By SUGAR in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-18-2011, 11:07 PM
  4. trans revs out
    By kbmukdk2316 in forum Pre-1996 4 speed Automatic (4T60E)(4T60E-HD)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-01-2010, 02:50 PM
  5. bottom swap, or how i learned to rebuild the bottom end completely
    By almighty in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-18-2009, 03:37 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •