Thread: wtf have i done?

not half ass... just nothing insane.

Originally Posted by gtpinsc

not half ass... just nothing insane.

Well get to it lol. Taxes should finally be coming to you

talked to VP of my company today... acct's started doin w2's yesterday... should have actual form by next week... god i miss my car... i did get me a truck to hold me over. 94 ranger step side 4cyl 5 speed.. which i will keep for my commuter to work and such. the "build" is gonna be a slow project. this is something i have never attempted by myself.. have 2 ASE certified friends that are gonna help out when they can. hopefully learn something in the process.

Originally Posted by gtpinsc

talked to VP of my company today... acct's started doin w2's yesterday... should have actual form by next week... god i miss my car... i did get me a truck to hold me over. 94 ranger step side 4cyl 5 speed.. which i will keep for my commuter to work and such. the "build" is gonna be a slow project. this is something i have never attempted by myself.. have 2 ASE certified friends that are gonna help out when they can. hopefully learn something in the process.

Yea anytime you start doing hardcore engine work its not easy, but just take it in steps and read read read a lot about it and really understand how it all goes together/comes apart and it makes life a lot easier. At least you have some nice people on here to help support you and give you valuable information. I want to learn a lot more about the 3800/POS tranny i mean ugh 4T65E-HD lol

well, one of my buddies has hooked me up with his ALLDATA acct... exploded view of L67 doesnt look all that complicated. Im sure with the help of them and the community at GPF it will turn out well. back to my question... 97 motor into 2002, any discrepancies?

hmmm 97 pcm on a 2002 trans? wanna say i seen somewhere that= fail

I thought 97 was the goofy year, that 98-02 was compatible? Am I wrong?

i dont see how it could? i "think" the only differences in 97-2002 is the vac modulated trans...

Originally Posted by gtpinsc

well, one of my buddies has hooked me up with his ALLDATA acct... exploded view of L67 doesnt look all that complicated. Im sure with the help of them and the community at GPF it will turn out well. back to my question... 97 motor into 2002, any discrepancies?

Not sure if alldata is any dif information wise but you should check out si2000 the gm service guide
You can use it on gpona.com if your a member there has some good info on anything 95ish and up and gm

Originally Posted by matt5112

Its an oldschool pushrod engine. Theres a reason it needs boost to make power.

The LS7 is an old school pushrod motor...along with the ZL1 Corvette from the late 60's...400+ RWHP and no boost...

Originally Posted by bluegtp91

The LS7 is an old school pushrod motor...along with the ZL1 Corvette from the late 60's...400+ RWHP and no boost...

I think they had just a few more cubes than 231 to work with...

Show me an old school pushrod engine making more than 200 WHP with 231 or less cubes.

427 cubic inches... with a 12.5:1 CR? Thats just ratarded.

higher the compression the better... I ran 110 leaded in my 68 cutlass all summer long

Update: engine swap along with headers next weekend

update: mines still down

Good luck man!