Maybe becuase Cobalts suck and are utterly slow.
|
|
11-02-2008
Maybe becuase Cobalts suck and are utterly slow.
11-03-2008
and a complete girls car.Originally Posted by Street Wolf
11-03-2008
lol
Originally Posted by SuperSport
11-03-2008
Not all are. I bet this would give just about any car on this board a run for its money. 14 flat @ 103 and its stock. And compared to our cars mods for that Ecotec are ridiculously cheap.
Officially Official: 2008 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbo with 260 HP bows at SEMA - Autoblog
11-03-2008
Whoop dee doo.
11-05-2008
So a car that's faster than the GTP or GXP is no big deal. Gotcha. What does that say about the GTP or GXP then? Just trying to get a feel for what you consider to be a "decent" car. Because by your comment, the GP deserves "whoop dee doo."
11-05-2008
yeah but i'm talkin about the pre-2008 version with only the s/c rated at 55bhp, ik the turbo one is a very affordable and decently quick car for the price, at stock it does 0-60 in a respectable 5.7 seconds
11-05-2008
55BHP?!?!?!?!!??!?!!
Maybe 205 HP rated
11-05-2008
I recently owned a Saturn Ion 3 with the 2.4L engine that the N/A Cobalt SS uses, it's a quick little engine to say the least and it's actually quite difficult for me to pick out which the faster car is, my old Ion or my new Grand Prix.
Good kill though, both the SS/SC and SS are quick little cars so regardless of which one it was, nice job - especially if he was being an ass.
11-06-2008
A good matchup would be mazda rx8 and a cobalt s/c. one car revs high as hell and the other one has a supercharger.... but both are still slow as f.
11-06-2008
Cobalt's would own chit over an RX-8...those Wankel's only put out about 150 ft. lbs. of torque
11-06-2008
x2cobalt's would own chit over an rx-8...those wankel's only put out about 150 ft. Lbs. Of torque
rx-8 ftl
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Tags for this Thread |
| Bookmarks |
Bookmarks |
