Thread: took a mustang

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 67
  1. #21 Re: took a mustang 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Theworld
    Posts
    2,072
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ZR1Vette09 View Post
    no because the 3.8 is a v6, not a v8. The fact that a v6 is comparable to a certain v8 makes that v8 a turd
    It's a SUPERCHARGED v6.

    Boost the v8, see what happens.

    Take the boost from the v6... and it's going no where.

    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22 Re: took a mustang 
    GrandPrix Junkie SeanGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Waterloo, Iowa
    Posts
    4,168
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by KawaFord View Post
    It's a SUPERCHARGED v6.

    Boost the v8, see what happens.

    Take the boost from the v6... and it's going no where.
    It is true. Stock GP GT is only like 190ish HP. Stock late 90's style mustang V6 is about the same.

    If you want to talk about a "comparable" V6, talk about the 3.6 in the new 'maro. Has about the same horsepower as the V8 GP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23 Re: took a mustang 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by KawaFord View Post
    ... which 14's aren't bad for a stock car, that you can usually pick up real cheap..

    Same goes for GTP's... high 14's low 15's in stock conditions.

    So does that make the 3.8's turds, since they can only push out 14's stock?
    I'm just saying stock for stock you wouldn't expect to class a FWD family sedan with a RWD, V8 powered, pony car...would you?

    Reason I say "turd" is because you should be buying a FAST car...or faster than most when you buy a GT...maybe I'm just not as impressed as I should be?
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24 Re: took a mustang 
    The mod from over yonder TheOtherNick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Charles City, IA
    Posts
    9,955
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SaW1833 View Post
    It is true. Stock GP GT is only like 190ish HP. Stock late 90's style mustang V6 is about the same.

    If you want to talk about a "comparable" V6, talk about the 3.6 in the new 'maro. Has about the same horsepower as the V8 GP
    Direct Injection works wonders.
    01 gtp-big cam e85 dd 78dodge- guzzling fuel 05 cummins- rollin coal
    SMGPFC Two Nipple General
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25 Re: took a mustang 
    Banned - Busted For Scamming
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    32812
    Posts
    3,060
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 01GTP View Post
    Direct Injection works wonders.
    Its more than just direct injection bud.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26 Re: took a mustang 
    Donating Users blowfishRus6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    g.a.
    Posts
    4,266
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    haha...

    the 4.6's are low compression and LOVE boost. with out boost tho there not doing much. ive seen plenty of people dump loads of money into the 4.6 na and hardly get any power. but on the other hand boost it like a termi and batta bing batta boom. and 2v's can make comparable power to a 4v when boosted.

    but stock, yes the 4.6's are turds. the best thing about it is these kids that have them dont know that and i end up showing them tail lights alot
    white 04 comg G gtp. wizair, pacesetters, slp 1.8 rr
    its slow.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27 Re: took a mustang 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    At my house
    Posts
    120
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    mods?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #28 Re: took a mustang 
    GTX Level Member nicksilvergt99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Reading, PA
    Posts
    930
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    LS1 kicks ass, no replacement for displacement, ect



    sorry just had to say it =)
    5.7L > 4.6L
    "This shocker crap is for high school kids, it's all about the double gauntlets, that's right, 2 fists forearm deep, someone make me a sticker. double gauntlets > shocker"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #29 Re: took a mustang 
    The mod from over yonder TheOtherNick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Charles City, IA
    Posts
    9,955
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by minichopper6hp View Post
    Its more than just direct injection bud.
    Thats the main reason for the power and economy tho.
    01 gtp-big cam e85 dd 78dodge- guzzling fuel 05 cummins- rollin coal
    SMGPFC Two Nipple General
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #30 Re: took a mustang 
    SE Level Member str8lucK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Brownsville
    Posts
    59
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by nicksilvergt99 View Post
    It had to have been a V8. V6 Mustangs sound like an 80 year old retarded person with the squirts
    well i have my stang for now and its a v6 but i made it sound real nice(Long Tube Headers, Flowmaster 40's, No cats, o/r H-pipe) but now im moving onto the GTP's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #31 Re: took a mustang 
    Becca Boo MizzBecca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,154
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by str8lucK View Post
    well i have my stang for now and its a v6 but i made it sound real nice(Long Tube Headers, Flowmaster 40's, No cats, o/r H-pipe) but now im moving onto the GTP's

    Good freakin choice
    I drive a POS
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #32 Re: took a mustang 
    SE Level Member RiceBurnt6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN.
    Posts
    92
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blowfishRus6 View Post
    haha...

    the 4.6's are low compression and LOVE boost. with out boost tho there not doing much. ive seen plenty of people dump loads of money into the 4.6 na and hardly get any power. but on the other hand boost it like a termi and batta bing batta boom. and 2v's can make comparable power to a 4v when boosted.

    but stock, yes the 4.6's are turds. the best thing about it is these kids that have them dont know that and i end up showing them tail lights alot
    I agree with this statement. I have 2001 Crown Vic Police Interceptor with v8 240 hp, 276 tq. Throw 6 psi and make over 315+ Whp. I agree N/A stock 4.6L's are a joke. But once you modify or boost it's a whole different story. I'm pretty sure my Pretty much stock CV would Eat my pretty much stock Regal Gs on top end. But down low there is no comparison Gs would run away.
    2000 Buick Regal Gs. 14.811@93.61 mph Bald Tires, Custom CAI, Stock with Stock GP Dual Exhaust.
    2000 Ford Taurus SeS "FFV", 2001 Ford CVPI "Police Interceptor" 1995 Mazda Mx-6 LS
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #33 Re: took a mustang 
    SE Level Member vantage08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    warminster
    Posts
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    My old 88 T-bird sounded like an 8 w/ Flowmasters. The mustang 6s didn't sound as good with the same set up.
    2005 Grand Prix- GTP-COMP.G-mods- K&N Intake, 180TSTAT,Liquid Metal Wheels, LED everything,605s, ZZP 3IN cat back.,Pacesetters,Inferno Hood+Air Dam, HPtune, HIDs.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #34 Re: took a mustang 
    Donating Users blowfishRus6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    g.a.
    Posts
    4,266
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RiceBurnt6 View Post
    I agree with this statement. I have 2001 Crown Vic Police Interceptor with v8 240 hp, 276 tq. Throw 6 psi and make over 315+ Whp. I agree N/A stock 4.6L's are a joke. But once you modify or boost it's a whole different story. I'm pretty sure my Pretty much stock CV would Eat my pretty much stock Regal Gs on top end. But down low there is no comparison Gs would run away.
    ive seen on a 2v gt and a 4v mach 1 that all the boltons in the world dont get you that much power N/A.

    full bolt on mach 1 with a higher compression block N/A. 310hp 340tq. he romped on it next to me on the highway one night and well i was not all that impressed for pretty much being a built N/A motor.

    the 2v gt has, TB, plenium, intake, exhaust, underdrive pullies, DART block with higher compression, 4.10's. made 270hp and 320tq untuned and ran 13.5 at 105 on a hot day. thats pretty much a full bolt on set up.

    N/A even if modified, there not making crazy power. but add boost to it, and they come alive.
    white 04 comg G gtp. wizair, pacesetters, slp 1.8 rr
    its slow.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #35 Re: took a mustang 
    SE Level Member RiceBurnt6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN.
    Posts
    92
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I agree, for the money spent it's not that impressive especially since going boosted is about the same price of all bolt ons. 310whp and 340rwtq is not bad, but you could make that at low boost and probably hit close to 500whp with about 10-12 boost. I like n/a but boost is the way to go in hp race, unless you are running a big block
    2000 Buick Regal Gs. 14.811@93.61 mph Bald Tires, Custom CAI, Stock with Stock GP Dual Exhaust.
    2000 Ford Taurus SeS "FFV", 2001 Ford CVPI "Police Interceptor" 1995 Mazda Mx-6 LS
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #36 Re: took a mustang 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Theworld
    Posts
    2,072
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RiceBurnt6 View Post
    I agree with this statement. I have 2001 Crown Vic Police Interceptor with v8 240 hp, 276 tq. Throw 6 psi and make over 315+ Whp. I agree N/A stock 4.6L's are a joke. But once you modify or boost it's a whole different story. I'm pretty sure my Pretty much stock CV would Eat my pretty much stock Regal Gs on top end. But down low there is no comparison Gs would run away.
    Police Interceptors top out at 130 mph.

    And I'm pretty sure the P71 would take the Regal off the line to.

    P71's are 15-14.8's stock

    Regal's stock are 15-15.5

    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #37 Re: took a mustang 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by KawaFord View Post
    Police Interceptors top out at 130 mph.
    Because of the driveshaft...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #38 Re: took a mustang 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by matt5112 View Post
    because of the driveshaft...
    o rly?
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #39 Re: took a mustang 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Some were capped at 120 for the same reason
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #40 Re: took a mustang 
    GTX Level Member JoelW98GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Portsmouth, OH
    Posts
    578
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RiceBurnt6 View Post
    I agree, for the money spent it's not that impressive especially since going boosted is about the same price of all bolt ons. 310whp and 340rwtq is not bad, but you could make that at low boost and probably hit close to 500whp with about 10-12 boost. I like n/a but boost is the way to go in hp race, unless you are running a big block
    500RWHP is a far cry. As I stated in my previous post about my 04 Roush. Full bolt ons, 2v, fuel mods, and a 12lb intercooled vortech. 396.5RWHP@5420rpm(rev limited) 395.5RWTQ@3980rpm TUNED on the dyno. Thats about as far as you want to push a 2v 4.6 without headwork and bottom end work. 500RWHP won't work with a stock 4.6. Heads won't flow enough and you will probably lose a rod or piston trying to reach that goal. But, still, 400RWHP was crazy fast. Too bad the car never made it home from the shop though. RIP
    98 GTP - Autolite 104s, wires, 180* t-stat, fwi, catless dp and plog, glasspack res, Reptile tuned PCM, tinted tails.
    91 Toyota MR2 Turbo - 327RWHP 322RWTQ 11.48@122mph
    03 BMW 325i - tint. stock.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Me vs 94 mustang gt
    By nicksilvergt99 in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 11-14-2009, 11:17 PM
  2. My GTP ate a mustang gt
    By pontiacGTP123 in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-05-2009, 04:07 PM
  3. Anybody had a run with an 06+Mustang?
    By GTP4 in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 11-15-2008, 10:27 AM
  4. 06 GP vs 5.0 Mustang
    By offroadfury6 in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 08-18-2008, 12:14 AM
  5. 01 GTP vs 98 Mustang GT 4.7L
    By Freebeer187 in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 140
    Last Post: 07-18-2008, 01:09 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •