Thread: Why is there still KR?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 68

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    TDC I am working on getting you some screen shots. I do understand what you are talking about.
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew_99GTP View Post
    TDC I am working on getting you some screen shots. I do understand what you are talking about.
    take ur time i should be here....the main thing i need to know is how the tm settings work...or how the % affect the reduction or addition of tm...but i think brian probably has that down packed....



    tell me what the stock settings are for the max turbine tq tcc locked and unlocked...if it is lower than 800 then you raise those values to get rid of tm...if it is higher then you lower those values...im going off of what brian has said
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Does anyone know what brake torque limit is?

    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    should be amount of tq that is allowed while brakes are engaged...hpt does not have this...not to my knowledge anyway


    thats the only thing that makes sense to me



    shoot now that i look at it...if it were for that it seems the values should all be the same...not increasing....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TDCRacing View Post
    should be amount of tq that is allowed while brakes are engaged...hpt does not have this...not to my knowledge anyway


    thats the only thing that makes sense to me



    shoot now that i look at it...if it were for that it seems the values should all be the same...not increasing....
    Kind of what I thought but PT tables are hard to understand sometimes. I completely understand how to tune, what I have trouble with is figuring out the table descriptions.

    Here is the description from the tm up shift table

    Percentage of total torque reduction for 1-2 upshiftusing Performance pressure pattern

    So in other words it is set to 5 right now, it will only reduce torque by 5%.
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Reptile View Post
    I think that in PT it is like it pulls 5% of the power at the shifts.

    You have 2 different TM tables that you need to look at. one of them is in the spark settings, the rest is in the transmission setttings. I have my max turbine torque settings at 800....but that's because I don't really care about my TM issues, I'm all about the speed, I can pretty much fix anything that breaks. But I wouldn't recommend doing this to any car.

    Sorry, I'm tired, and I just kind of skimmed through the thread. TM isn't all bad....I was just saying that it will register as KR, nothing wrong with that once you eliminate the usual suspects.



    There the hell you are!!!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    on the s/s you provided...did you alter any of the tables? if not did someone else?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Just for S&G's, set everything from 4800 on up in 1st 2nd and 3rd to 600. That should cover your WOT shift, and see if it kills the kr. Again, it may not be good on the tranny...but that's a starting point if you want to begin to eliminate TM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GrandPrix Junkie Sabrewings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Barksdale AFB, LA
    Posts
    4,879
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Reptile View Post
    Just for S&G's, set everything from 4800 on up in 1st 2nd and 3rd to 600. That should cover your WOT shift, and see if it kills the kr. Again, it may not be good on the tranny...but that's a starting point if you want to begin to eliminate TM.
    I'm leaving that portion of TM alone until I get one of Trannyman's trannies.
    2004 Impala LS - got some mods sold!!!
    2009 Subaru Impreza WRX STI

    NAIOA moderator Still Imp'n, just in a different Imp.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Reptile View Post
    Just for S&G's, set everything from 4800 on up in 1st 2nd and 3rd to 600. That should cover your WOT shift, and see if it kills the kr. Again, it may not be good on the tranny...but that's a starting point if you want to begin to eliminate TM.
    Next time we tune I plan on playing with all the TM files to see if we can get rid of the KR.
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    yea i've come to the conclusion that lower numbers mean more tq mngmt applied...the reason that i belive this is because if you look at around the 4500-5600 rpm range the numbers are lower there than in the lower rpm ranges....

    4500-5600 rpm's are most likely where you are going to compleate a high p/t or wot shift therefore more tq management is being applied....since the highest numbers i am seeing are 1020 i'd set them to there...it wouldnt do anything but minimize tm more...and if it breaks the tranny then it was on it's very very last leg anyway...and you may as well replace it...i dont see in any way that that would happen testing this tm to try to cure the kr issue


    and im talking across the board but since the kr is happining in the higher rpm's at wot across the board really wouldnt be nessary to see if this is the problem...now to make it quicker it would have to be done like i said for sure
    Last edited by TDCRacing; 06-05-2008 at 10:44 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TDCRacing View Post
    yea i've come to the conclusion that lower numbers mean more tq mngmt applied...the reason that i belive this is because if you look at around the 4500-5600 rpm range the numbers are lower there than in the lower rpm ranges....

    4500-5600 rpm's are most likely where you are going to compleate a high p/t or wot shift therefore more tq management is being applied....since the highest numbers i am seeing are 1020 i'd set them to there...it wouldnt do anything but minimize tm more...and if it breaks the tranny then it was on it's very very last leg anyway...and you may as well replace it...i dont see in any way that that would happen testing this tm to try to cure the kr issue
    Here is the description that PT gives about the table(incase you couldn't read the small letters in the screen shot).

    This table specifies the maximum allowable engine torque on an upshift as a function of engine speed.
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew_99GTP View Post
    Here is the description that PT gives about the table(incase you couldn't read the small letters in the screen shot).

    This table specifies the maximum allowable engine torque on an upshift as a function of engine speed.
    nope i could read it...thanks though


    So basicly it seems like more tq management is being aplied in the rpm shiftpoint range and less through out the regualr rpm range


    acording to the numbers anyway
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TDCRacing View Post
    nope i could read it...thanks though
    Well then in reading the description I would assume that the number in each cell is the max torque the engine can create during and up shift. This also doesn't make sense to me because 76 ft/lbs in 3rd gear at 6K seems a little low to me. Either way when I get a chance I am going to set the table to one extreme and then to the other extreme and see what happens. Might have to do this in the totally stock Regal though.
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TDCRacing View Post
    So basicly it seems like more tq management is being aplied in the rpm shiftpoint range and less through out the regualr rpm range
    You lost me there? What tables are you looking at?
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    That should get rid of it...I did that when I was trying to go through the process of elimination. My hardest thing to deal with right now is keeping it from going into drivetrain abuse mode since I got my Alky installed. I'm not going to eliminate it any more until I get the new trans put in.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    GTX Level Member Andrew_99GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Salem, ND
    Posts
    763
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Drivetrain abuse mode? Can you elaborate some more on this?
    Red 2dr 99 GTP"Old" Z7 t66, A/A IC'd, Custom Heads, 65# Inj, ST2 Cam, Meziere Elec Pump, JP Double Roller(with machined crank gear), Plogs, PLX W/B, Powrtuner SOLD

    "New" 2007 Duramax ccsb with a few mods
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    ok so im a little late...lol
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    TDCRacing
    Guest
    and im talking across the board but since the kr is happining in the higher rpm's at wot across the board really wouldnt be nessary to see if this is the problem...now to make it quicker it would have to be done like i said for sure
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Why is there still KR? 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The lower numbers do indicate TM is being applied. It's the maximum torque allowed during a certain condition. If the PCM senses that more than this amount of torque is present, it will pull timing/fuel...etc to maintain that threshold.

    Fortunately the first thing you should do is turn off the injector disable, so it will look other places....and keep in mind the PT only shows a fraction of the tables that are actually in the PCM. There are still many that you can't see.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •