Thread: New Camaro = UGLY!!!

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 61
  1. #41 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    GTX Level Member a98gtp4u's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    GEORGIA
    Posts
    857
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #42 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    GT Level Member Sheepdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    371
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yeah, I really loved the old camaros, but the styling of the new camaros is like a general shape of the old bodystyle but still heading down that road that ends in the bubble cars. Like the ones I saw in this one Wesley Snipes movie that I can't remember the name. God, I don't want my only option to be a bubble car in 50 years.

    I've never really been a fan of the new maros, although as much as I hate to say it, I think ford did it right. They kept the shape a lot the same, but just kinda refined it.
    Last edited by Sheepdog; 09-28-2009 at 11:26 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #43 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Lima, Oh
    Posts
    75
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i think the new camaros are sexy. alot better than the mustangs. but, its a "new" car. give it a year or 2 and GM will refine it just like ford did with the mustang.
    2002 Black GTP, 3.2 pulley, CAI, Pacesetter Headers, 180 thermostat, xp cam, L32 rods, zzp pcm, N* TB, FWI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #44 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    SE Level Member PH04GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Janesville, WI
    Posts
    43
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sabrewings View Post
    Any version of the LS9, detuned or not, will not make it into the Camaro. You do know it costs over $15k to produce, right? That would put the Camaro way beyond its targeted price point.

    It would more likely be the LSA from the Caddy CTS-V, which is quite different internally than the LS9 (cheaper to produce, as a result).
    According to my GM source it is the LS9. Could be they change their minds at production time, who knows, but since it's not ever going to be produced anyway it's kinda of a mute point.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #45 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    GrandPrix Junkie Sabrewings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Barksdale AFB, LA
    Posts
    4,879
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PH04GTP View Post
    According to my GM source it is the LS9. Could be they change their minds at production time, who knows, but since it's not ever going to be produced anyway it's kinda of a mute point.
    An LS9 Camaro would be close to $45k MSRP if not more. It's not going to happen, since they just can't produce the LS9 any cheaper. The LSA is almost as powerful, but much more realistic in terms of production pricing since it's in the Caddy CTS-V. But you're right, it's moot. They can say anything they want since they know it isn't happening.
    2004 Impala LS - got some mods sold!!!
    2009 Subaru Impreza WRX STI

    NAIOA moderator Still Imp'n, just in a different Imp.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #46 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    74
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JayGTP02 View Post
    i think the new camaros are sexy. alot better than the mustangs. but, its a "new" car. give it a year or 2 and GM will refine it just like ford did with the mustang.
    maybe
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #47 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    Resident HOMOsapien ZR1Vette09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    3,619
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PH04GTP View Post
    According to my GM source it is the LS9. Could be they change their minds at production time, who knows, but since it's not ever going to be produced anyway it's kinda of a mute point.
    *moot- open to discussion or debate
    '00 Blazer- Good riddance '06 Grand Prix GT- Dead and Cool '05 Silverado- Sold '96 Jeep Cherokee-DD '97 BMW 328i-Project
    <brandonl2000> how did she become handicapped?
    <brandonl2000> LMAO D!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #48 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    GrandPrix Junkie Sabrewings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Barksdale AFB, LA
    Posts
    4,879
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ZR1Vette09 View Post
    *moot- open to discussion or debate
    2nd definition:

    An issue regarded as potentially debatable, but no longer practically applicable. Although the idea may still be worth debating and exploring academically, and such discussion may be useful for addressing similar issues in the future, the idea has been rendered irrelevant for the present issue.
    2004 Impala LS - got some mods sold!!!
    2009 Subaru Impreza WRX STI

    NAIOA moderator Still Imp'n, just in a different Imp.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #49 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    Resident HOMOsapien ZR1Vette09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    3,619
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    My english teacher preferred the second definition as that's how it is more commonly used. Although honestly, I'd rather just say "it is no longer up for discussion" just to be clear
    '00 Blazer- Good riddance '06 Grand Prix GT- Dead and Cool '05 Silverado- Sold '96 Jeep Cherokee-DD '97 BMW 328i-Project
    <brandonl2000> how did she become handicapped?
    <brandonl2000> LMAO D!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #50 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    GTX Level Member 03GTPLE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Tyler, TX
    Posts
    604
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheepdog View Post
    Yeah, I really loved the old camaros, but the styling of the new camaros is like a general shape of the old bodystyle but still heading down that road that ends in the bubble cars. Like the ones I saw in this one Wesley Snipes movie that I can't remember the name. God, I don't want my only option to be a bubble car in 50 years.

    I've never really been a fan of the new maros, although as much as I hate to say it, I think ford did it right. They kept the shape a lot the same, but just kinda refined it.

    Movie = Demolition Man with Snypes, Stallone, and Bullock. The 4th gen prototype camaro was in that movie too!!! (it was red, and very different from production).



    Also, I like the exterior, but I can NOT stand the interior.... I almost cried and threw up at the same time when I saw it in person. If I had one on order (something I considered), I would have cancelled it!! It really disappointed me, especially with all of the anticipation of the new camaro coming out. I'm one of those guys that used to have a really nice 3rd Gen camaro and wished it was still around.

    -Jesse
    2003 White Grand Prix GTP Limited Edition
    - 3.4 pulley, tune by Boostd1/CLINT@AIR, Short Ram Intake, PLOG, 3" ZZP Downpipe, AL 104's, 180* t-stat, Impala STB & 12" cross drilled/slotted/zinc washed rotors, DDM HID's, and put in a heads up display for now...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #51 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    GT Level Member Sheepdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    371
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 03GTPLE View Post
    Movie = Demolition Man
    Wow, you're right, that was it haha. Good call on that. I saw parts of it a real long time ago... didn't realize Stallone was in it, too...

    Quote Originally Posted by 03GTPLE View Post
    I'm one of those guys that used to have a really nice 3rd Gen camaro and wished it was still around.
    Yeah my dad has an 89 rs convertible in good condition sitting in the garage right now. It's nice and all, but it's nothing compared to the kind of cars he used to have (70 aar cuda, 69 vette, etc). Can't wait until I can find my early second gen T/A
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #52 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    Resident HOMOsapien ZR1Vette09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    3,619
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    one of my good friends is redoing an 88 firebird. was originally the v6 tpi, but he's swappin in a carburated 350. he's expecting 330 horses out of it, and it is NICE
    '00 Blazer- Good riddance '06 Grand Prix GT- Dead and Cool '05 Silverado- Sold '96 Jeep Cherokee-DD '97 BMW 328i-Project
    <brandonl2000> how did she become handicapped?
    <brandonl2000> LMAO D!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #53 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    GTX Level Member a98gtp4u's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    GEORGIA
    Posts
    857
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    is he building the 350 out of the car b4 he installs it?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #54 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    resident snitch gtpinsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    sumter,south carolina
    Posts
    6,432
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperSport View Post
    If I had a dollar for everytime I heard that...it seems EVERYONE had an mint Iroc at one time or another, but when I want one, nobody seems to have them anymore...

    Ill find one though. Im determined.

    not an iroc but its in excellent condition..... and its for sale.

    02 GTP with mods 05 GP for DD
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperSport View Post
    The majority of the people here are potheads who want to buy good condition parts at junkyard prices.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #55 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    GXP Level Member JoRoW99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Grand Island, Nebraska
    Posts
    2,015
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ^sex
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #56 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    GXP Level Member Iron Indian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Moore, Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,619
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gtpinsc View Post

    not an iroc but its in excellent condition..... and its for sale.

    How much is that 3rd Gen going for? Damn good looking car begging for an LS swap!
    Shawn W. Larsen

    2005 Pontiac GTO 6.0 LS2/A4... Stalled/Cam Only: 406 RWHP , 370 RWTQ

    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #57 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    Resident HOMOsapien ZR1Vette09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    3,619
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by a98gtp4u View Post
    is he building the 350 out of the car b4 he installs it?
    Yeah, he did most of the engine before he dropped it in. It's just sittin in place now while he finishes things up. I'm way freakin jealous
    '00 Blazer- Good riddance '06 Grand Prix GT- Dead and Cool '05 Silverado- Sold '96 Jeep Cherokee-DD '97 BMW 328i-Project
    <brandonl2000> how did she become handicapped?
    <brandonl2000> LMAO D!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #58 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    134
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    How about these? Both are for sale.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #59 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    Donating Users mystic231's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    302
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The latest on the new Z28. This is from MotorTrend.com dated September 21, 2009:

    With GM now out of bankruptcy, the Z28 program has been restarted. Why? Insiders say the Z28 business case now makes sense because the new UAW contracts have reduced the labor costs on the car to the point where GM feels it can price it competitively -- and far enough away from Corvette. That's the good news. The bad news is EPA certification and GM durability requirements mean the Z28 is unlikely to go on sale until late 2011.

    At the rear is a taller lip spoiler that runs the full width of the car. A new rear-bumper fascia features a deeper section with integrated exhaust outlets. The wheels are 20-inchers with an aggressive "tuning-fork" five-spoke pattern.
    A new hood features a large, forward-facing scoop. Underneath is the 6.2-liter supercharged LSA V-8 that also powers the Cadillac CTS-V. As we have already confirmed, this is quite a powerplant, delivering 556 horsepower at 6100 rpm and 551 pound-feet of torque at 3800 rpm.
    The near-4300-pound CTS-V thunders from 0 to 60 mph in 4.1 seconds and nails the quarter mile in 12.3 seconds (automatic) or 12.4 seconds (manual). Top speed is limited to 175 mph in the auto (to preserve the tranny), but the manual will storm to an autobahn-melting 193 mph. As the Z/28 will weigh 200 to 300 pounds less than the CTS-V, it may nail 60 mph in 3.9 seconds and run the quarter in the very low 12s. This Z28 could be the fastest Chevy ponycar since the legendary ZL-1-powered COPO 9560 Camaros built 40 years ago.
    The Z28 is likely to only be available with a six speed manual transmission, unless GM can piggyback some of the car's certification on work already done for the CTS-V to get the automatic into the range at low cost.
    '98 Bright Red GT 278,000 miles and counting...
    '02 Galaxy Silver GTP GMPP Suspension, F Body front brakes, TDC FWI intake, Ported M90, Intake, and Throttlebody, Overkill PCM
    '02 Bright Red GT
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #60 Re: New Camaro = UGLY!!! 
    GrandPrix Junkie Sabrewings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Barksdale AFB, LA
    Posts
    4,879
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Underneath is the 6.2-liter supercharged LSA V-8 that also powers the Cadillac CTS-V.


    I hate to say I said so, but I said so.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sabrewings View Post
    Any version of the LS9, detuned or not, will not make it into the Camaro. You do know it costs over $15k to produce, right? That would put the Camaro way beyond its targeted price point.

    It would more likely be the LSA from the Caddy CTS-V, which is quite different internally than the LS9 (cheaper to produce, as a result).
    Quote Originally Posted by PH04GTP View Post
    According to my GM source it is the LS9. Could be they change their minds at production time, who knows, but since it's not ever going to be produced anyway it's kinda of a mute point.
    2004 Impala LS - got some mods sold!!!
    2009 Subaru Impreza WRX STI

    NAIOA moderator Still Imp'n, just in a different Imp.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Look at this.... pretty ugly
    By Quicklynx in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 11-20-2008, 01:16 PM
  2. Land Rover/Ceaser/My Ugly Ass/Wheeling Pictures and Vids
    By Street Wolf in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-01-2008, 03:38 PM
  3. Ugly Butt.
    By bentendo92 in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-05-2008, 05:09 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •