Thread: Lame dyno results.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 49
  1. #21 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    GTP Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    513
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    you guys are running awfully rich. i run my turbo car at 11.6-11.8 afr and have tuned several m90 cars at 12.0-12.2... without issue.
    - 2001 Grand Prix XGT -- 11.21@124MPH
    - 2010 Chevy 2500HD LTZ -- Car hauler
    - 2011 BMW 328i Xdrive -- Wife's Daily
    - 2014 Ford F250 crew cab -- 6.2 liters of ford fail
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    Grocery Getter x2 goldgp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    redneck tennessee
    Posts
    554
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    5
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    X2 on the injectors. No way your maxing them.I'm running a gen v 3.4 pulley, 15° wot timing, 11.3 afr, XP cam,still have space.
    1998 GTP Mods: Getrag 5 speed ,balanced bottom end,ARP hardware,L32 rods,Federal pistons .20 over,XP Cammed,Double roller,130# springs,and 3.4 Gen V,SSC springs,GMPP sways, C5 calipers,12 inch brakes.2000 Grand Prix SE 3.8 Mods: GT dual exaust,plog,downpipe,Transgo Shift kit,1.9 yella terra rr,strut braces,gmpp kit.Both noob tuned with HP Tuner
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    GTP Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    513
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Fuel pump and or filter issues?
    - 2001 Grand Prix XGT -- 11.21@124MPH
    - 2010 Chevy 2500HD LTZ -- Car hauler
    - 2011 BMW 328i Xdrive -- Wife's Daily
    - 2014 Ford F250 crew cab -- 6.2 liters of ford fail
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    GrandPrix Junkie SgtMarshal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kemmerer, Wyoming
    Posts
    4,704
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Received)
    25
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NebTurboST5 View Post
    Fuel pump and or filter issues?
    I was wondering that too, maybe low fuel pressure.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,022
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Whats wrong with below 16º of timing? I'll never understand why some think that you shouldnt go below what stock is set at. I never had a issue running 13-15º, 1 degree of timing is maybe 3-5hp that you MIGHT be missing out on and who cares at that point.


    And as far as the AFR side goes, I blame the climate and sea level as well as fuel and the fact that every car is different. I couldnt run leaner than very low 11's without it acting up on 93 E10. So keeping it at 11.0 was what I dealt with and just stopped caring. The heaton doesnt help there anyway either.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    EGT's.

    MPG's.

    Sluggish throttle response.

    Crap overall performance.

    I personally never wanted to see less than 16* for a reason.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    GTP Level Member 99GT2dr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cibolo, TX
    Posts
    545
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    How much MPG do you gain at WOT with a few extra degrees timing? Never even bothered to watch my MPG when I'm all out, maybe I will next time, see what the DIC says.
    '11 Suburban LTZ
    '99 SSEi
    '99 GT
    '09 G8 GT
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #28 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    GXP Level Member Timing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    gardner,mass
    Posts
    2,142
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blueguy View Post
    EGT's.

    MPG's.

    Sluggish throttle response.

    Crap overall performance.

    I personally never wanted to see less than 16* for a reason.
    Agree, i seen a very noticeable difference from 13* to 18*.
    08 MazdaSpeed 3- Treadstone tr8l, Ebay Piping, Ported intake,Thermal gasket, Cs Injector Seals,Cobb intake/inlet, Autotech Internals, Poly mounts, Speed Daddy DP, Magnaflow CB,
    RPF1 17x9 255/45 Direzza Zll
    04 COMPG- Vs, getrag 284 RIP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #29 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,022
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    We arent in the gas long enough for EGT's to really matter than much.

    MPG at WOT is for the lulz, I got 2.5 to 3 mpg if that.

    How does throttle response relate to a timing figure below stock for WOT?? It's still going to pick up and go.

    I didn't see a loss in performance with 13-15º, I ran there because it didn't knock. I'll take the 2 psi more in boost pressure and 1-3º less in timing and still make more power than stock.

    Timing isn't everything but no doubt that in certain vehicles a higher timing figure would be sought after to make the most power possible. I know I refer to this alot but look at turbo'd LS motor, guys run 12-15º and still make 500+ WHP on under 12-14 lbs of boost on pump gas.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #30 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    Awesome Level Member chrsmi1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    824
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Fivefingerdeathpunch View Post
    We arent in the gas long enough for EGT's to really matter than much.

    MPG at WOT is for the lulz, I got 2.5 to 3 mpg if that.

    How does throttle response relate to a timing figure below stock for WOT?? It's still going to pick up and go.

    I didn't see a loss in performance with 13-15º, I ran there because it didn't knock. I'll take the 2 psi more in boost pressure and 1-3º less in timing and still make more power than stock.

    Timing isn't everything but no doubt that in certain vehicles a higher timing figure would be sought after to make the most power possible. I know I refer to this alot but look at turbo'd LS motor, guys run 12-15º and still make 500+ WHP on under 12-14 lbs of boost on pump gas.
    I can deal with less timing in certain situations. But for what the OP is doing, I would suggest he pulley up to a 3.6 and run more timing.
    Comp G. E85, 2.8, Headers, Tune, Intake, S1X, 105# springs, 60 # injectors, 255 walbro,etc.

    *NEW* 2002 Camaro Z28- Lid, Headers, Catback

    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #31 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Fivefingerdeathpunch View Post
    We arent in the gas long enough for EGT's to really matter than much.

    MPG at WOT is for the lulz, I got 2.5 to 3 mpg if that.

    How does throttle response relate to a timing figure below stock for WOT?? It's still going to pick up and go.

    I didn't see a loss in performance with 13-15º, I ran there because it didn't knock. I'll take the 2 psi more in boost pressure and 1-3º less in timing and still make more power than stock.

    Timing isn't everything but no doubt that in certain vehicles a higher timing figure would be sought after to make the most power possible. I know I refer to this alot but look at turbo'd LS motor, guys run 12-15º and still make 500+ WHP on under 12-14 lbs of boost on pump gas.
    All I read was I have no hard evidence it made less power or ran worse other than I think it did.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #32 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,022
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I see no hard evidence on your side either.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #33 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    Moderator DanPrixGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Grand Rapids, Michigan
    Posts
    5,488
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ginseng View Post
    Agree, i seen a very noticeable difference from 13* to 18*.
    This too.

    I've been as low as 14 degrees timing, and now i'm at 17.5+

    It's definitely a big difference between the two and I was faster on a 3.4 with 17+ degrees, than a 3.2 with 14 degrees. Personally, I'd taking timing over boost, as I see a more noticeable increase in power rather than going to a smaller pulley.

    But I'm now running a 3.0 with 17.5* with some head room to spare. And at this point, I will not drop to a 2.9 and keep throwing more boost at it, as I'd rather increase the timing to roughly 19* now.
    '97 GTP - Stage 2 Heads, 90# Springs, 1.9 Harland Sharp Rockers, Gen V, 3.0, Intake, N* TB, LQ4, FSIC, 10.5mm Wires, Poly Mounts, SLP Headers, Borla Exaust, Built Trans - SOLD*

    '08 G8 GT - 6.7L 408CI Stroker, 239/254 Cam, Fast Intake, 102mm TB, CAI, Full Exhaust.





    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #34 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    flint
    Posts
    23
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kewGTP View Post
    He said my injector cycle was at 98% but I will confirm that with my HPTuners version . And if I would have been in the 240/270 range, no, this post wouldn't exsist. I suppose my goal for the post was to see if there is anything I'm missing that could explain the lower than expected numbers. Leaning it out to 11.5 might be an option .
    Hptuners calculation (specifically the pulse width part) is wrong for all 04+ grand prix. It reads roughly 15% too high. I havent figured out the correct formula for it yet mostly because the information for it is not availible.
    Doesnt run 9s
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #35 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Fivefingerdeathpunch View Post
    I see no hard evidence on your side either.
    Consistant facts on multiple platforms prove that wrong.

    www.google.com
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #36 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    SE Level Member kewGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Appleton, WI
    Posts
    106
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Soooo my friend and I searched high and low to find the fuel filter only to find that it has been removed and just fuel line is in its place! My question is how plausible is it my injectors have been/are being damaged with no filter to protect them? I'm getting the filter installed in line in a few days FYI
    https://flic.kr/p/AaC713
    Last edited by kewGTP; 11-15-2015 at 06:23 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #37 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    your car never had a in line filter, the sock on the fuel pump is your filter. id say your injectors are fine.

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #38 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    SE Level Member kewGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Appleton, WI
    Posts
    106
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    If that's the case I will just jump to the 3.6 pulley and see if I'm still knocking . Ugh, first world problems.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #39 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    GXP Level Member GTPpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Schuyler, NE
    Posts
    2,972
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    23
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You also have to remember that this is an 04+ car. Stock injectors will not go as far.

    My comp g with a stock pulley and stock injectors was showing over 100% injector duty cycle at about 5500rpms. I know that's not really correct, but it probably was 95% idc corrected.


    2001 GTP Drag Car - XPZ, Tischler heads, Upsidedown M90 IC'd, e85, Gen V, 2.3 w/ 5%OD
    2005 F350 6.0 - studded, deleted, tuned
    2001 GTP - cam, headers, nitrous, stock trans - 11.83 @ 116 <$2k in mods - sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #40 Re: Lame dyno results. 
    GTP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    628
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Agreed, The fact the 04+ is a returnless system does in fact give you less Injector headroom. I know many guys that have run out of injector on nearly stock setups
    2003 SSEi,
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. dyno results
    By ADrugDealer in forum General Grand Prix Discussion
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 08-17-2013, 08:14 PM
  2. Dyno results - 98 GTP
    By iree75 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-08-2013, 09:01 PM
  3. Dyno Results
    By SnowFlake in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 294
    Last Post: 02-18-2012, 10:47 AM
  4. GTP Dyno Results!!!
    By OrangeL67 in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-17-2011, 11:25 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •