Thread: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28
  1. #1 Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    GTP Level Member Impala131's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    709
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Hey guys,

    I know this question comes up often on various forums (High Compression/Low Boost vs Low Compression/High Boost) but I'd like to limit the discussion to the Eaton M90 on the 3800SII.

    If I am putting together an engine build, say a 350-400bhp setup, and I am limiting myself to using the M90... does the L36 make more sense than the L67? (I'm not really talking about a simple top swap, but rather, building an engine from the ground up.)

    My understanding is, both blocks can handle this horsepower range as long as detonation is prevented. Since the L36 can make more power with the same amount of boost as the L67 (assuming no knock), I would assume that you can run closer to the stock pulley than you could with an l67.

    So rather than running a tiny pulley, which creates more drag on the crank, and generates more heat... why not just run a bottom end with more compression, and a bigger pulley? Seems like a much more efficient setup.
    2003 Grand Prix GTP.... the journey begins again....
    E85 Self Tune with HPT, 80# Injectors, Gen V 3.4 pulley, SD Headers, AL605 Plugs
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    I live here. Slick2500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
    Posts
    7,463
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    From what I understand zzp uses a l36 in their setup so I think what you are saying makes sense. In theory you can make more power with less boost.
    2003 Redfire Metallic Chevy Tahoe Z71 - Airaid Modular Intake Tube, Flowmaster Exhaust.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Sunfire Guy
    Superchargers take away horsepower
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,030
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I like the dished pistons on the L67 though, only reason why I would stay with a lower compression block.


    Another way to look at it is, you don't always have to run the really small pulley. You can use timing to your advantage if using a 93 octance + meth and or E85 fuel, then you could run a 3.0ish pulley with extra timing to be at the same level as a 2.8ish pulley.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    typically you'll run out of pulley options with the L67 block a lot sooner, but setup right both are capable of spinning the m90 way out of it's efficiency range.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vassar, Mi
    Posts
    615
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bio248 View Post
    typically you'll run out of pulley options with the L67 block a lot sooner, but setup right both are capable of spinning the m90 way out of it's efficiency range.

    Exactly, if your going for maximum power and plan on running enough octane to support it high compression will get you further. Once the m90 is out of steam you have to make power somewhere else, at that point more compression and better airflow are your only options. Or nitrous that works too I guess.
    1999 GTP Coupe ------ Comp Cam 76-802-9, 2.7" pulley, S2IC, N*, FWI, SD Headers, DHP Tune, Built trans (single 3.29s, 300m), Magnaflow Catback, 60#injectors, E85, MT ET Street DR's, Fbody brakes, PRJ pump/rails. 302whp/328ft-lbs.......12.41@110mph
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    SE Level Member 13aceofspades13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Ionia
    Posts
    90
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    the L-36 and L-26 Pistons are less dished for higher compression, this makes it a very common practice to do a "Bottom end swap." this allows the some 9:1 higher compression ratio of the N/A 3800s... HOWEVER consider this, the connecting rods on the L-36 and even the L-26 are not as heavy duty as the L-67 L-32 engines. if you start pushing 500HP or 350 with high revs you could be dealing with broken rods or spun bearings!

    my advice if you really want too push power, go with a L-67or L-32 bottom end for a budget, or "race prep." your own, you can get high strength connecting rods and ceramic coated pistons through ZZP, and you can get the crank and the rest of the assembly balanced so then you can have the higher power rating and revs and not worry about spinning a rod, then you can compensate the compression for higher boost.

    "Foxy" 2008 Pontiac Grand Prix Base model, Intake, 5.5 water pump pulley, thrush turbo muffler, flipped dogbones, MSD 8.5MM super conductor Wires, Accel super coils.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    Moderator Russosaur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    8,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    4
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    But the cost of machine time would be crazy. I doubt the N/A bottom ends are a that much weaker than SC cars.
    2019 F150 XL - Make it run 12's N/A
    2012 F150 STX
    - Gonna be a race truck
    02 GT "Slowkar" 180k - Top Swap, Gen V, TOG Headers, 1.9s, e85, 3.25. It's literally the slowest e85 car ever....

    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    most likely you'd chip a piston before bending a rod. just about every time.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    Moderator dsmuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Coldwater, OH
    Posts
    15,758
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Next motor I'm building is going to have a stock L36 bottom end
    98 GTP modded 1.9's, sd headers, 3.4", zzp 1.0 230K miles scrapped.
    04 Comp G zzp stb's, UMI ta's, Speedbuilt sways, bully flo heads, XP, zzp headers, fsic, thrasher shift kit, 60#, 2.6" corsa 2.5", Inferno hood
    01 gt z7 turbo tep trans zzp motor
    08 g8 gt cam exhaust 11.87@118
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    GrandPrix Junkie machinegunsquid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Either motor will work fine as long as you build it accordingly.

    For a high power build, it's foolish to do anything but turbo it.

    For a strictly M90 blower setup though, you're going to need a big lump stick (with supporting mods) and ported heads/matching LIM.

    Stick with a "larger" pulley (3.0-3.2) and run a bunch of timing. If you are able to get away with 24+ degrees or so with no knock, start dropping pulley sizes.

    "**** bills. You can live in your car but you can't race your house" -dsmuts
    Want her to stop when she's not looking karate chop her in her crotch that should quiet her for a bit or at the very least put a smile on your face -REDCOMPG
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    GrandPrix Junkie CTKGP09's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Willoughby, Ohio
    Posts
    3,831
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    you sir have the same mindset I do. rather than running out of pulley options, go L36 bottom end and keep the blower much happier and have options for modding in the future. and as stated above, build it right and eliminate knock and you will not have issues
    '04 Chevy Silverado LT 4x4 - intake, headers, full exhaust, zo6 cam, 799 heads, tune, leveled, 33's
    '00 Grand Prix GTP DAYTONA 500 - L36 block, S1X, intercooled, GenV, N*, headers, full exhaust, coilovers, 5 speed swap, stage 3+ clutch
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    I live here. Slick2500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
    Posts
    7,463
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I have a l26 bottom end in my car, they are cheep as dirt and almost always have low miles too.
    2003 Redfire Metallic Chevy Tahoe Z71 - Airaid Modular Intake Tube, Flowmaster Exhaust.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Sunfire Guy
    Superchargers take away horsepower
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    GTP Level Member TwinV6GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Gatineau
    Posts
    701
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I don't believe in boost + high compression in a pump gas scenario. Even race machines, I've seen better results with reasonable compression + very high boost (turbo)
    S/C is another story with efficiency dropping so quickly and HP loss through driving the S/C. Stock compression for pump I think is better in general.

    For a completely maxed out M90 on pure race fuel high compression is the way to go.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    timing is harder to run consistently versus more boost due to fluctuations in weather and octane of fuel.

    however, boost > timing is a turbo mentality, too.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    GTP Level Member TwinV6GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Gatineau
    Posts
    701
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bio248 View Post
    timing is harder to run consistently versus more boost due to fluctuations in weather and octane of fuel.

    however, boost > timing is a turbo mentality, too.
    S/C reduces the boost vs Timing advange but it's still there, especially intercooled. But at one point too small pulley and no intercooler makes it very difficult to get rid of knock.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i'm a firm believer if that i can't roll up to a gas station and be forced to run 91 and not worry about destroying it then i didn't build it big enough.

    i love ethanol, methanol, and race gasses, but i'm just not a dedicated race car fan so being able to street drive it and fill up wherever i end up is a key thing to me about any car i put together.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vassar, Mi
    Posts
    615
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    This is what I'm talking about, here is where I'm at. Maxed m90 (2.7 on a genV), maxed timing (22-24*), and I still have plenty of headroom for KR on E85 but no way to use it. That 9.5:1 sure sounds good about now. You will max out an M90 very easily and still be left looking for more power. At this point there is nowhere to make more power with the system without rebuilding the valve train with a bigger cam and expensive ported heads.
    1999 GTP Coupe ------ Comp Cam 76-802-9, 2.7" pulley, S2IC, N*, FWI, SD Headers, DHP Tune, Built trans (single 3.29s, 300m), Magnaflow Catback, 60#injectors, E85, MT ET Street DR's, Fbody brakes, PRJ pump/rails. 302whp/328ft-lbs.......12.41@110mph
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    GTP Level Member TwinV6GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Gatineau
    Posts
    701
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Smith View Post
    This is what I'm talking about, here is where I'm at. Maxed m90 (2.7 on a genV), maxed timing (22-24*), and I still have plenty of headroom for KR on E85 but no way to use it. That 9.5:1 sure sounds good about now. You will max out an M90 very easily and still be left looking for more power. At this point there is nowhere to make more power with the system without rebuilding the valve train with a bigger cam and expensive ported heads.
    Pretty impressive you are able to run such a small pulley and that much timing without any knock even on E85. That STG2 IC is doing its work !!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    GXP Level Member Turbocharged400sbc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    hangover park IL
    Posts
    2,714
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    11
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    l26 rods will snap if you look at em wrong, l36 is the only way to go unless yer considering spray, then is a l67/32

    if ya want more compression from the 67/32 then just use two layers of the MLS HG and bump it up .4
    ~James~ Psychotic Gearhead
    projects: 84 Cressida waGN~ 90 LN3 3800, equal length headers, T70, 89 700r4, misc parts,
    1994 Oldsmobile 442 (462ci-4wd-2 engines) L67/4t80e^2,
    00 Turbo Regal 608 fwhp 575ftlbs at 5500rpm, 98 WhippledRiv, 97 GTP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    LaBarge Supercharged sseilmnop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Mercer, Pa
    Posts
    1,766
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    9
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    L32 L67 blocks are hard to find. They also want stupid money for blocks with 150,000


    I put in a L26 block.
    Adapters, Phenolic Intercoolers, Supercharger Parts & TVS2300
    http://stores.ebay.com/QualitySuperchargers
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. low compression on number 5
    By chrisferguson84 in forum 5.3L V8 (LS4)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-04-2014, 06:15 PM
  2. No compression
    By carbon in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-22-2011, 09:12 PM
  3. high compression, low boost. lower compression, higher boost
    By BlackGT97 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-25-2011, 11:52 AM
  4. Bad Compression?
    By comongoose in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-24-2009, 01:22 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •