Thread: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 33 of 33
  1. #21 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    try comparing the same cams next time.

    It might help a tad that all of the XPZ cars are running ZZP Al heads.

    Zooms 464 is on E85

    m112 Intense's Cam Motion Stage 3 Grind:
    1. JohnT w/ 400WHP (I/C, IS3 Heads)

    m90 Intense's Cam Motion Stage 3 Grind:
    1. Ted Quartana w/ 399WHP (G5 m-90, IS3 Heads, I/C)
    2. rsilva w/ 366WHP (G5 m-90, IS3 heads, I/C)
    3. Intense 97 GTP w/ 355WHP (I/C, IS3 Heads)
    4. DonF w/ 351WHP (I/C, IS3 Heads)
    5. GTPMorad w/ 349WHP (I/C, IS3 Heads, non-n20)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Bethel, CT
    Posts
    87
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    3. Fred Cakanic w/ 421WHP (I/C, G5 m-90, ZZP S3 Heads, 9.5:1) [STD]

    those arent aluminum and 10whp more than any m112
    i see a 1whp difference between the m112 and m90 on two identical setups
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Gettin' a little SNOWY in here.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    GT Level Member RegalGS98s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    369
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegtp91 View Post
    Gettin' a little SNOWY in here.
    I was thinking the same thing, but I think it's funny.
    SMGPFC #0330 - 3.25, Intercooled, Custom Tune, 1.84rr, LS6 Springs, roller timing chain, SLP Headers, Borla Exhaust, built Trans, B&M Trans Cooler, home cut poly uppers, gapless rings, N* TB, Ported heads.
    Soontocome: CAM?, Custom modified M112, home poured Poly Engine and Trans mounts
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    GT Level Member RegalGS98s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    369
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by selliott View Post
    The gen 3 hybrid is much more difficult then the gen v. The gen3 uses 2 plates to compensate for the dual bolt pattern. The genv hybrid uses 1 and is just an extension of the m90 case and bolts right up to the m112. Also be careful the lightning m112 uses a weaker rotor coating than the mustang m112. Im still dealing with the hybid project I have a set of overkills gen3 plates and will be fabing a genv plate. I havent done much work with the car or the hybrid lately but will get back on it soon.
    Yeah, if I knew about the hybrid idea back when I bought the Lightning m112, then I would of got the mustang m112. I was thinking the Lightning m112 inlet would of been easier to modify than the mustang's. So now if I go with the hybrid, guess I'll need a Gen V casing and a Mustang m112. My girl will love that. At least I should be able to resell the Lightning m112 for what I paid for it. The rotor coating on my m112 is bad, but better than most Gen III's.
    SMGPFC #0330 - 3.25, Intercooled, Custom Tune, 1.84rr, LS6 Springs, roller timing chain, SLP Headers, Borla Exhaust, built Trans, B&M Trans Cooler, home cut poly uppers, gapless rings, N* TB, Ported heads.
    Soontocome: CAM?, Custom modified M112, home poured Poly Engine and Trans mounts
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by GenVI805 View Post
    3. Fred Cakanic w/ 421WHP (I/C, G5 m-90, ZZP S3 Heads, 9.5:1) [STD]

    those arent aluminum and 10whp more than any m112
    i see a 1whp difference between the m112 and m90 on two identical setups
    fred has more money into his car than you can put into a damn house. he also leg humps zzp like it's going out of style (which it has...).

    his car is nice, but for the money he put into it he should be making more power and run faster times.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    The way you calculate lift is to take the intake or exhaust number and multiply it times your rocker ratio. That gives you the total lift. The S1X * 1.80 = .579/.592. Do the math and check. I'm not sure if the valve is open too long or too far with 1.84. I knew someone that had done it and it was acceptable. So I did it knowing the headwork that was needed. I didn't forge any new bounds or figure things out to ensure it's safe. Sorry...
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #28 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    GT Level Member RegalGS98s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    369
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BillBoost37 View Post
    The way you calculate lift is to take the intake or exhaust number and multiply it times your rocker ratio. That gives you the total lift. The S1X * 1.80 = .579/.592. Do the math and check. I'm not sure if the valve is open too long or too far with 1.84. I knew someone that had done it and it was acceptable. So I did it knowing the headwork that was needed. I didn't forge any new bounds or figure things out to ensure it's safe. Sorry...
    No worries. Sounds like I would be venturing into uncharted territories. The m112 isn't that common on the 3800 either, but i don't think it would be as much of an issue as too much lift for the heads to handle. With my math, I figured about 0.591"/0.605" lift using the S1X and 1.84s.
    SMGPFC #0330 - 3.25, Intercooled, Custom Tune, 1.84rr, LS6 Springs, roller timing chain, SLP Headers, Borla Exhaust, built Trans, B&M Trans Cooler, home cut poly uppers, gapless rings, N* TB, Ported heads.
    Soontocome: CAM?, Custom modified M112, home poured Poly Engine and Trans mounts
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #29 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    Likely that's acceptable. I think some of the Stage 4 cams get into that range.

    M112 not common? If you want any pics of how the one I assembled for a guy was done, just holler.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #30 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    GT Level Member RegalGS98s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    369
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Looks like that's the expensive custom m112 case that I think Intense only made like 10 of. And yeah, post away. Do you remember what mods where on the car to handle the m112. Heads ported? I spoke with Trannyman and some local friends for advice on porting mine. My machinist was quite impressed how good they turned out. Either he didn't have high expectations for me or else I did a good job, lol.
    SMGPFC #0330 - 3.25, Intercooled, Custom Tune, 1.84rr, LS6 Springs, roller timing chain, SLP Headers, Borla Exhaust, built Trans, B&M Trans Cooler, home cut poly uppers, gapless rings, N* TB, Ported heads.
    Soontocome: CAM?, Custom modified M112, home poured Poly Engine and Trans mounts
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #31 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #32 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    GT Level Member RegalGS98s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    369
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BillBoost37 View Post
    Only read the first page so far. That was a great offer you made to build it for him. And I see your Bonneville is running the S1X and 1.8s. Is that a daily driver?
    SMGPFC #0330 - 3.25, Intercooled, Custom Tune, 1.84rr, LS6 Springs, roller timing chain, SLP Headers, Borla Exhaust, built Trans, B&M Trans Cooler, home cut poly uppers, gapless rings, N* TB, Ported heads.
    Soontocome: CAM?, Custom modified M112, home poured Poly Engine and Trans mounts
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #33 Re: 8.5 or 9.4 compression with m112 supercharger 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    It was for a while, but even built transmissions, my right foot and that motor weren't a good combo.

    Take a look at the Red Ripper thread I currently have going here. That's the motor from the Bonne.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. M112 V.S. Gen V?
    By colindunn in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-28-2010, 06:43 PM
  2. m112
    By CHAMPS97 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-03-2009, 12:16 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •