Quote Originally Posted by KeithGTP03 View Post
I dunno...Ive taken a bunch of early 5.0's. The newer one showed me its tail lights.
Quote Originally Posted by cliffdawg View Post
ive taken a few to and he has a gxp i dont think hes bs'n this one
Quote Originally Posted by KwazrollinZ28GTP View Post
i dunno about this, i put 2 or so car lengths on a 5.0 with a 3.4 setup

and if i get spanked out on the street, i bring the race car out, and if that gets spanked, well i'll shake your hand
Come on guys, ya'll know me better then this right?

Quote Originally Posted by RotyP View Post
Are we BS'in or talking about the real stuff? @The OP.. 96-97 had 4.6L v8s rated at a whoping 215hp and 285ft/lbs and rumors say the 98s were up to 225. Even the 94-95 5.0s were rated the same 215. Should have found out what type "work under the hood" he had because there should have been more than 6 lengths on him with your 303 rated hp. Granted there is about a 400 pound weight difference but that still does not account for the huge power difference.... But anyway, great kill!
Winner!!!!



The BS flag was more for the 96 5.0, although I wasn't going to be upset if the OP got into with me about my slow azz rustang lol. Just messing around with the new guy, till you guys came and pissed in my porridge I know how pathetic the 2valve 4.6s are without F/I. Been there, done that. Even with cams and bolt ons, I wouldn't doubt the OP's story. Especially with the NPI 4.6, good kill OP. I'm one of the resident mustang owners here, and I'm a prick. Welcome.