Mind = Blown

**Slick2500** · 04-18-2014

http://blog.powerblocktv.com/how-far...s-take-a-look/

**MCbatt** · 04-18-2014

That's just amazing how much of a difference there is between the 2 cars.

**ItHurtz** · 04-18-2014

Ever see a old muscle car in a actual accident vs a new car? new car is crushed to ****, old car might have a few bent panels. That vid is bull.

**Bluemagic** · 04-18-2014

Absolutely correct ^

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

**Odi** · 04-20-2014

And yet statistics speak for themselves. Crumble zones actually save lives by reducing the g-force impact, fascinating.

**coolone** · 04-20-2014

Originally Posted by Odi

And yet statistics speak for themselves. Crumble zones actually save lives by reducing the g-force impact, fascinating.

^^^this^^^

The vehicle structure and shell is now designed to absorb and transfer forces away from the interior, but the video is pretty amazing nonetheless!

**blackspike2710** · 04-20-2014

That energy has to go somewhere. Either absorbed by the body and frame, or the jelly doughnut behind the seat.

**ItHurtz** · 04-20-2014

Its fake people

**16MustangVet** · 04-20-2014

You people are insane to think this vid is a fake........

And no ITHURTZ guy this isn't some conspiracy, its called crumple zones and hell even most new cars have ****ty safety ratings.

Go find a vid of a Volvo against an old car.

Id take an airbag or side curtain over a dash to my face and a engine block to my knees anyday!!!

**Speedy1973** · 04-20-2014

ruined a perfectly good 59 Bel-air

**Scottydoggs** · 04-20-2014

those old cars were far from safe lol id not want to be a crash in one.

**Sandman** · 04-20-2014

Old cars survive, driver dies

New car dies, drive survives

**Speedy1973** · 04-20-2014

Originally Posted by Sandman

Old cars survive, driver dies

New car dies, drive survives

i beg to differ. in that OP. neither car is surviving lol

**sseilmnop** · 04-20-2014

Originally Posted by Speedy1973

i beg to differ. in that OP. neither car is surviving lol

I'd want to be the driver in the newer car. I would live to buy another car.

**Speedy1973** · 04-20-2014

true, but then again. it comes down to advanced in car design. I agree i'd prefer to be in a new car. But back then, that's what was there to be bought, so people bought em.

**Scottydoggs** · 04-20-2014

remember kids, back in the day seat belts meant the car was unsafe lol hudson fixed that misconception.

**ericspecullaas** · 04-20-2014

scotty you talking about 30's cars? i have rode in them and yeah i can say this if you ever crashed you were as good as dead. you have a metal pole aimed right at your heart metal everywhere lol so yeah

**Scottydoggs** · 04-20-2014

Originally Posted by Scottydoggs

remember kids, back in the day seat belts meant the car was unsafe lol hudson fixed that misconception.

sorry got my old cars mixed up, it was the tucker http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tucker_48

**ItHurtz** · 04-20-2014

scotty now thats a video, fire and all!

But does this test give us the complete picture? I don’t think so. What it does show is something many people have known for years, the GM frame design of that era had a serious safety flaw.
Ill agree with this video though, as its more real
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-WYKYrq5FI