Thread: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 120
  1. #41 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Kopstain View Post
    Some of this stuff is just basic operation of a roots type blower though.
    You would be very surprised at how overlooked these basic operations are.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #42 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by snowflake View Post
    you will always make more power with colder air before the blower.
    .86 whp ftw?
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #43 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    SE Level Member Mike Kopstain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    117
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by matt5112 View Post
    Touche.

    Can we apply that demand for data before conclusion to the rest of the thread now?
    Sure but as I mentioned earlier, it's all out there, both actual data and empirical data and not just with 3800s/ m90s.

    BlueGTP91's assessment of hotter/ less dense air translating to less knock is just not accurate. If it was then we'd just all shut off our intercoolers in the summer and be able to run smaller pulleys because now the air is hotter and less dense... lol. It's just not accurate and it goes against basic common knowledge.

    The only time I'd expect someone to have to pulley up in the winter is if they built their car in the dead of summer, when it was hot and the setup was built to be right on the cusp of knocking. Otherwise, if it's setup properly you really shouldn't have to pulley up in cooler weather.

    Thinking about shopping with ZZP or the other guys? - Order with us instead and we'll give you a 5% off coupon code for your next order! Click here to learn how!

    Like us on Facebook!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #44 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    GXP Level Member Tuner-Extraordinaire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Out West
    Posts
    2,889
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Kopstain View Post
    Sure but as I mentioned earlier, it's all out there, both actual data and empirical data and not just with 3800s/ m90s.

    BlueGTP91's assessment of hotter/ less dense air translating to less knock is just not accurate. If it was then we'd just all shut off our intercoolers in the summer and be able to run smaller pulleys because now the air is hotter and less dense... lol. It's just not accurate and it goes against basic common knowledge.

    The only time I'd expect someone to have to pulley up in the winter is if they built their car in the dead of summer, when it was hot and the setup was built to be right on the cusp of knocking. Otherwise, if it's setup properly you really shouldn't have to pulley up in cooler weather.
    And if we don't have an intercooler?
    Whine with your Cheese?
    Stock+Self Tuned. Going for low 14's everyday.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #45 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Then, well...you're ****ed by the laws of everything, Chris.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #46 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    SE Level Member Mike Kopstain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    117
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Nixon View Post
    And if we don't have an intercooler?
    It's still not true. Reduce the whole issue of knock down to this: heat. Everything you do as far as modifications go is to reduce heat/ pressure. You open up your exhaust to reduce cylinder pressure which reduces heat which reduces knock. You intercool your air charge to reduce heat, you add an aftermarket intake not only to supply the engine with more air but to reduce the amount of resistance the blower experiences when sucking in air which in turn reduces heat, you run a cooler thermostat to... you guessed it... reduce heat. Just about every supporting modification serves to introduce more air into (and out of) the engine but more importantly, reduce increased cylinder pressure and temperatures as a result of more boost.

    Just make sure you guys understand what's causing knock though. It's heat... It's a fuel mixture igniting because of cylinder pressure/ temperature driving it to ignite prior to the spark plug igniting. When I see someone running a 3.0 pulley and negating the importance of inlet temperatures it just tells me that they don't get it. Not only is it important but exponentially more so on a setup running a 3.0 pulley non-intercooled. It's just the opposite of reality. Maybe the sky is purple in your world. :-)

    So when the outside temperature drops, the drop in temperature should offset the increase in density, thus negating the need to up a pulley size or two. So yes, all things equal, the denser air is more likely to result in knock but in order for the air to be denser it also needs to be proportionately cooler which offsets any issues on all but setups that are either a. improperly tuned or b. on the edge of experiencing knock even in the best of conditions.

    Here's an article I wrote on this a bunch of years ago:

    Knock Retard and you... - W Body Store

    At the end of the day I'd encourage everyone to do their own research. Don't listen to me and don't listed to others. Go out and read, learn how this stuff works on your own, what causes what and all of the sudden you understand how A affects B and B affects A and how one can't change without affecting the other.
    Last edited by Mike Kopstain; 05-14-2012 at 12:00 AM.

    Thinking about shopping with ZZP or the other guys? - Order with us instead and we'll give you a 5% off coupon code for your next order! Click here to learn how!

    Like us on Facebook!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #47 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Kopstain View Post
    It's still not true. Reduce the whole issue of knock down to this: heat. Everything you do as far as modifications go is to reduce heat/ pressure. You open up your exhaust to reduce cylinder pressure which reduces heat which reduces knock. You intercool your air charge to reduce heat, you add an aftermarket intake not only to supply the engine with more air but to reduce the amount of resistance the blower experiences when sucking in air which in turn reduces heat, you run a cooler thermostat to... you guessed it... reduce heat. Just about every supporting modification serves to introduce more air into (and out of) the engine but more importantly, reduce increased cylinder pressure and temperatures as a result of more boost.

    Just make sure you guys understand what's causing knock though. It's heat... It's a fuel mixture igniting because of cylinder pressure/ temperature driving it to ignite prior to the spark plug igniting. When I see someone running a 3.0 pulley and negating the importance of inlet temperatures it just tells me that they don't get it. Not only is it important but exponentially more so on a setup running a 3.0 pulley non-intercooled. It's just the opposite of reality. Maybe the sky is purple in your world. :-)

    So when the outside temperature drops, the drop in temperature should offset the increase in density, thus negating the need to up a pulley size or two. So yes, all things equal, the denser air is more likely to result in knock but in order for the air to be denser it also needs to be proportionately cooler which offsets any issues on all but setups that are either a. improperly tuned or b. on the edge of experiencing knock even in the best of conditions.

    Here's an article I wrote on this a bunch of years ago:

    Knock Retard and you... - W Body Store

    At the end of the day I'd encourage everyone to do their own research. Don't listen to me and don't listed to others. Go out and read, learn how this stuff works on your own, what causes what and all of the sudden you understand how A affects B and B affects A and how one can't change without affecting the other.
    There's more to consider here than just a bad tune or a car that's setup on the verge of knocking. Which is basically where you want to be since the car will make the most power there... anyway, there comes a point in an m90s life where it'll heat the air more than the inlet temps change. Not to mention there will be more drag on the motor and more boost pressure, further exacerbating the situation.

    In the winter, you can pulley up and STILL make more power than you did in the summer.
    I remember my genV setup made big numbers uncorrected in the winter on a 3.5 pulley. In the summer I dropped to a 3.2 and could still never come close to the uncorrected winter numbers. Although the SAE numbers were all very similar, with the edge going to the summer numbers.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #48 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    I live here. Slick2500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
    Posts
    7,464
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by szalajka05 View Post
    M112 v6 mustang drive. Pedal to metal! - YouTube

    Stock hood, this is a quick video after he just installed his 3.4 pulley. Didn't tune it yet.
    Why does that car sound like it has massive rod knock?
    2003 Redfire Metallic Chevy Tahoe Z71 - Airaid Modular Intake Tube, Flowmaster Exhaust.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Sunfire Guy
    Superchargers take away horsepower
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #49  
    GTP Level Member dazedandconfused's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    bedford, Pa
    Posts
    538
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Epic video fail
    97 gtp, cone filter mod, downpipe and glasspack to stock muffler mod, 180* t-stat mod, bad driver mod
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #50 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    keep it on topic, we might be getting somewhere.

    i'll never be the one to argue about a coler intake temperture making more power (with the correct tune and supporting components, key not), but i am a person that likes to believe in bang for buck/bang for effort in things i do. the relative gains of going from an open cone to a full fledged 4" fender well intake pulling 100% ambient air is going to prove out to be less than 10whp in 100% of cases. this doesn't seem to me like it is worth the effort in the end for that. therefore, i'll stick with an open cone because it takes me 2 minutes to do and $25 for a filter.

    no one can argue physics here.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #51 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    Poppin 'em thangs mechguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,177
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I am in the minority that believes a CAI is best. Having driven various vehicles in cold weather, they always were more powerful because of the increased oxygen density.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #52 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    wisconsin
    Posts
    389
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You can't fight science... Cooler air means more fuel means more power. Can't get around it. Cai wins
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #53 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    SE Level Member Mike Kopstain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    117
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    There's more to consider here than just a bad tune or a car that's setup on the verge of knocking. Which is basically where you want to be since the car will make the most power there... anyway, there comes a point in an m90s life where it'll heat the air more than the inlet temps change. Not to mention there will be more drag on the motor and more boost pressure, further exacerbating the situation.
    Sure but you should be constantly scanning. People make the mistake of setting up their car one day, tuning it, not seeing any knock and then assuming they have a knock-free setup. It literally changes day to day and you actually don't want to be that close because it leaves no room for error. As far as the M90 heating air more than the inlet temperature changes, agreed but again, this is precisely why you want to ensure that your inlet temperatures are as low as possible to begin with. Why would anyone intentionally handicap their own setup? :-)


    In the winter, you can pulley up and STILL make more power than you did in the summer.
    I remember my genV setup made big numbers uncorrected in the winter on a 3.5 pulley. In the summer I dropped to a 3.2 and could still never come close to the uncorrected winter numbers. Although the SAE numbers were all very similar, with the edge going to the summer numbers.
    Be that as it may, it still isn't contrary to the point I'm trying to make. I think that just goes to show that a non-intercooled car is almost always going to have a larger performance change from temperature differences than an inter cooled car.

    Thinking about shopping with ZZP or the other guys? - Order with us instead and we'll give you a 5% off coupon code for your next order! Click here to learn how!

    Like us on Facebook!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #54 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    GXP Level Member Tuner-Extraordinaire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Out West
    Posts
    2,889
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    So you're suggesting it's wise to set up your car in winter or where you're pulling in the coldest air possible so you have that wiggle room when the weather heats up.

    Not the worst idea in the world, If a bit conservative.
    Whine with your Cheese?
    Stock+Self Tuned. Going for low 14's everyday.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #55 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    #Billsnamechangessuck MrPoopyButthole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    15,112
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    But then there is velocity and volume too

    Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.
    2004 Saab 9-5 Aero - WAHSAABI - Way too much power/Koni FSD & Hirsch Springs/Big Sways - DD/AutoX'r
    2007 Ford F-150 Lariat - 5.4L V8 - Bill secretly likes it
    2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport SE - Wifey Mobile
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #56 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Kopstain View Post
    Sure but you should be constantly scanning. People make the mistake of setting up their car one day, tuning it, not seeing any knock and then assuming they have a knock-free setup. It literally changes day to day and you actually don't want to be that close because it leaves no room for error. As far as the M90 heating air more than the inlet temperature changes, agreed but again, this is precisely why you want to ensure that your inlet temperatures are as low as possible to begin with. Why would anyone intentionally handicap their own setup? :-)




    Be that as it may, it still isn't contrary to the point I'm trying to make. I think that just goes to show that a non-intercooled car is almost always going to have a larger performance change from temperature differences than an inter cooled car.
    I'm not trying to be contrary to your point, just adding in a little bit more. I agree with you 100% and anyone who thinks colder air isn't going to make more power 100% of the time simply hasn't grasped very basic fundamentals.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #57 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    please name a point in time in which any of us have argued against that point.

    please note my statement above and what it actually means.

    please retort on what you read, and agree. because you know i'm right.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #58 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    wisconsin
    Posts
    389
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bio248 View Post
    please name a point in time in which any of us have argued against that point.

    please note my statement above and what it actually means.

    please retort on what you read, and agree. because you know i'm right.
    You yourself even said a cai does more, even if a cai gives you 1hp more than a open cone its still more...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #59 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    But it isn't worth the effort is what he is getting at.

    And please don't tell me you'd notice the 1-3 WHP difference a FWI is going to give you...because you won't.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #60 Re: HAI vs CAI. CAI wins 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegtp91 View Post
    But it isn't worth the effort is what he is getting at.

    And please don't tell me you'd notice the 1-3 WHP difference a FWI is going to give you...because you won't.
    I'm wondering where all these arbitrary figures are coming from. "1-3whp" ".86whp" "less than 10whp 100% of the time"
    Are you guys out there with mobile dyno rollers doing WOT pulls to see the differences???

    You guys are assuming, and not basing your assumptions on facts. You're basing them on... well, nothing really. Your opinion I guess.
    The facts are that colder air makes more power. And we're all looking to make more power, right?



    That intake setup cost me roughly the price of the filter and a 3.5'' piece of aluminum pipe. I think it was like 60 bucks all said and done.
    Now you're on the street idling in Texas and your underhood temps are skyrocketing.

    Do you want to pull air from that, or from the fender where it's close to ambient?

    On a dyno the difference may not be huge because as you guessed it, most people dyno after a cooldown with their hoods open and a fan on the engine, but in the real world where we all drive there is enough of a difference to warrant all that extra effort to extend the filter into the fender.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. '05 WK Hemi vs. Me - Who Wins?
    By SliceTheRice in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-26-2011, 09:17 PM
  2. Jon Jones wins...
    By IR II IP IDEATH in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-20-2011, 09:42 PM
  3. gt wins
    By mezzoni in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-15-2011, 03:10 PM
  4. who wins?
    By NewGPkid in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-12-2010, 07:13 PM
  5. GTP vs GXP: GRAND PRIX WINS
    By Panther427 in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-31-2009, 01:11 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •