|
Sure but as I mentioned earlier, it's all out there, both actual data and empirical data and not just with 3800s/ m90s.
BlueGTP91's assessment of hotter/ less dense air translating to less knock is just not accurate. If it was then we'd just all shut off our intercoolers in the summer and be able to run smaller pulleys because now the air is hotter and less dense... lol. It's just not accurate and it goes against basic common knowledge.
The only time I'd expect someone to have to pulley up in the winter is if they built their car in the dead of summer, when it was hot and the setup was built to be right on the cusp of knocking. Otherwise, if it's setup properly you really shouldn't have to pulley up in cooler weather.
Then, well...you're ****ed by the laws of everything, Chris.
It's still not true. Reduce the whole issue of knock down to this: heat. Everything you do as far as modifications go is to reduce heat/ pressure. You open up your exhaust to reduce cylinder pressure which reduces heat which reduces knock. You intercool your air charge to reduce heat, you add an aftermarket intake not only to supply the engine with more air but to reduce the amount of resistance the blower experiences when sucking in air which in turn reduces heat, you run a cooler thermostat to... you guessed it... reduce heat. Just about every supporting modification serves to introduce more air into (and out of) the engine but more importantly, reduce increased cylinder pressure and temperatures as a result of more boost.
Just make sure you guys understand what's causing knock though. It's heat... It's a fuel mixture igniting because of cylinder pressure/ temperature driving it to ignite prior to the spark plug igniting. When I see someone running a 3.0 pulley and negating the importance of inlet temperatures it just tells me that they don't get it. Not only is it important but exponentially more so on a setup running a 3.0 pulley non-intercooled. It's just the opposite of reality. Maybe the sky is purple in your world. :-)
So when the outside temperature drops, the drop in temperature should offset the increase in density, thus negating the need to up a pulley size or two. So yes, all things equal, the denser air is more likely to result in knock but in order for the air to be denser it also needs to be proportionately cooler which offsets any issues on all but setups that are either a. improperly tuned or b. on the edge of experiencing knock even in the best of conditions.
Here's an article I wrote on this a bunch of years ago:
Knock Retard and you... - W Body Store
At the end of the day I'd encourage everyone to do their own research. Don't listen to me and don't listed to others. Go out and read, learn how this stuff works on your own, what causes what and all of the sudden you understand how A affects B and B affects A and how one can't change without affecting the other.
Last edited by Mike Kopstain; 05-14-2012 at 12:00 AM.
There's more to consider here than just a bad tune or a car that's setup on the verge of knocking. Which is basically where you want to be since the car will make the most power there... anyway, there comes a point in an m90s life where it'll heat the air more than the inlet temps change. Not to mention there will be more drag on the motor and more boost pressure, further exacerbating the situation.
In the winter, you can pulley up and STILL make more power than you did in the summer.
I remember my genV setup made big numbers uncorrected in the winter on a 3.5 pulley. In the summer I dropped to a 3.2 and could still never come close to the uncorrected winter numbers. Although the SAE numbers were all very similar, with the edge going to the summer numbers.
keep it on topic, we might be getting somewhere.
i'll never be the one to argue about a coler intake temperture making more power (with the correct tune and supporting components, key not), but i am a person that likes to believe in bang for buck/bang for effort in things i do. the relative gains of going from an open cone to a full fledged 4" fender well intake pulling 100% ambient air is going to prove out to be less than 10whp in 100% of cases. this doesn't seem to me like it is worth the effort in the end for that. therefore, i'll stick with an open cone because it takes me 2 minutes to do and $25 for a filter.
no one can argue physics here.
I am in the minority that believes a CAI is best. Having driven various vehicles in cold weather, they always were more powerful because of the increased oxygen density.
You can't fight science... Cooler air means more fuel means more power. Can't get around it. Cai wins
Sure but you should be constantly scanning. People make the mistake of setting up their car one day, tuning it, not seeing any knock and then assuming they have a knock-free setup. It literally changes day to day and you actually don't want to be that close because it leaves no room for error. As far as the M90 heating air more than the inlet temperature changes, agreed but again, this is precisely why you want to ensure that your inlet temperatures are as low as possible to begin with. Why would anyone intentionally handicap their own setup? :-)
Be that as it may, it still isn't contrary to the point I'm trying to make. I think that just goes to show that a non-intercooled car is almost always going to have a larger performance change from temperature differences than an inter cooled car.In the winter, you can pulley up and STILL make more power than you did in the summer.
I remember my genV setup made big numbers uncorrected in the winter on a 3.5 pulley. In the summer I dropped to a 3.2 and could still never come close to the uncorrected winter numbers. Although the SAE numbers were all very similar, with the edge going to the summer numbers.
So you're suggesting it's wise to set up your car in winter or where you're pulling in the coldest air possible so you have that wiggle room when the weather heats up.
Not the worst idea in the world, If a bit conservative.
But then there is velocity and volume too
please name a point in time in which any of us have argued against that point.
please note my statement above and what it actually means.
please retort on what you read, and agree. because you know i'm right.
But it isn't worth the effort is what he is getting at.
And please don't tell me you'd notice the 1-3 WHP difference a FWI is going to give you...because you won't.
I'm wondering where all these arbitrary figures are coming from. "1-3whp" ".86whp" "less than 10whp 100% of the time"
Are you guys out there with mobile dyno rollers doing WOT pulls to see the differences???
You guys are assuming, and not basing your assumptions on facts. You're basing them on... well, nothing really. Your opinion I guess.
The facts are that colder air makes more power. And we're all looking to make more power, right?
That intake setup cost me roughly the price of the filter and a 3.5'' piece of aluminum pipe. I think it was like 60 bucks all said and done.
Now you're on the street idling in Texas and your underhood temps are skyrocketing.
Do you want to pull air from that, or from the fender where it's close to ambient?
On a dyno the difference may not be huge because as you guessed it, most people dyno after a cooldown with their hoods open and a fan on the engine, but in the real world where we all drive there is enough of a difference to warrant all that extra effort to extend the filter into the fender.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Tags for this Thread |