Thread: Dyno Results

Page 6 of 15 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 295
  1. #101 Re: Dyno Results 
    GXP Level Member JoRoW99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Grand Island, Nebraska
    Posts
    2,015
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Good point. The fact that we are even debating its use vs a turbo is saying something by itself.

    And about the IC, i didnt see your adapter plate but why not just make the IC out of aluminum?
    '01 GT - Top swapped. ported SC/Heads/TB, SD headers, open cone, HPTuners, 3.4 MPS, 60#'s, E85.______________________SMGPFC #99_______________________
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #102 Re: Dyno Results 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    All your points comparing to a stock blower are invalid. Why compare it to a m90 when you could make better comparisons to aftermarket superchargers?
    Whipple
    M112
    Kenne Bell
    Procharger

    How is this any better than any of those?
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #103 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Well it's better than the m112 because the m112 is not any more efficient than the GenV. You simply have the option of going to a higher ceiling in terms of MAX hp potential. There's almost ZERO information on someones m90 to m112 gains. You might actually lose horsepower doing that swap.

    Whipple... how many people have a whipple setup? How many of those people showed gains from the m90 to the whipple with nothing else done?
    How many people have Kenne Belles?
    How many people have Centri blowers?

    Where's all the info?

    I put the TVS swap together in my driveway. Drove it to the dyno untuned and picked up 50whp.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #104 Re: Dyno Results 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,409
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    Drove it to the dyno untuned and picked up 50whp.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #105 Re: Dyno Results 
    Donating Users 16MustangVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sh1t hole Afghanistan Currently
    Posts
    5,418
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I put the TVS swap together in my driveway. Drove it to the dyno untuned and picked up 50whp.[/QUOTE]

    Ahhhh and the bullsh1t continues keep on keepin on!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #106 Re: Dyno Results 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    Without causing a big todo, I'll say.....I disagree about power levels on the TVS vs Gen V with heads, IC etc. Been there, done that...following in the footsteps of a car that made equal your current power level. That was 93 octane, no Ethanol to suppress knock. Yes, a lot more parts, but done before the TVS was an option.

    BTW guys doing cost. Don't forget TB adapter, wiring, maf change etc. Although no matter how you look at it.. the TVS is good power for the relative money invested without any "credit" for parts replaced. The cooler we can get a supercharger output temps....the better off.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #107 Re: Dyno Results 
    GXP Level Member Zef_66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,084
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    For me, and I assume a lot of people that would be interested in doing this, the cost to build from a stock engine with new parts would be the most beneficial. Then subtract off the mods that you have. That is the best way to gage things. Start with a stock engine L67 and add up the costs to completion. Then compare it to similarly structured prices of other mods.

    Just my $.02
    2001 GSE
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #108 Re: Dyno Results 
    GT Level Member RegalGS98s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    369
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Congrats on the great numbers on a different setup SnowFlake. When I get my build done, I'll be using an M112. Will have to see how those numbers unfold. With better fuel, hopefully you'll hit the 400whp mark.
    SMGPFC #0330 - 3.25, Intercooled, Custom Tune, 1.84rr, LS6 Springs, roller timing chain, SLP Headers, Borla Exhaust, built Trans, B&M Trans Cooler, home cut poly uppers, gapless rings, N* TB, Ported heads.
    Soontocome: CAM?, Custom modified M112, home poured Poly Engine and Trans mounts
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #109 Re: Dyno Results 
    GXP Level Member darkhorizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    flintnasty MI
    Posts
    2,596
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zef_66 View Post
    For me, and I assume a lot of people that would be interested in doing this, the cost to build from a stock engine with new parts would be the most beneficial. Then subtract off the mods that you have. That is the best way to gage things. Start with a stock engine L67 and add up the costs to completion. Then compare it to similarly structured prices of other mods.

    Just my $.02
    Following that model you can get a brand new PT67 for the same price that he sold his gen5 for allegedly.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #110 Re: Dyno Results 
    I live here. TLSheff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Durant, Oklahoma, United States
    Posts
    8,033
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    For the simple gains I think this is costly but a good thing to look at.

    But I want to know how did you get the TVS to mount to the LIM??? Did you just put an adapter plate under it or did you just modify the whole LIM? If there is a plate you could fix a Intercooler between them and probably drop pulley a little more and gain up some more power before opting for better heads. If you just modified the LIM you need to get another LIM and fabricate a plate so you CAN sandwich a Full Stack IC lol

    Either way still proud that this worked. Its may or may not be as cost effective as a turbo, but it IS still another option to those past a GenV. Wasn't many options over a GenV so I'm glad it DID work and has potential to be even better. You can't get great things without spending a little money so boohoo it cost a couple grand, most people throw several grand at a engine to get a 150+hp gain.

    Quote Originally Posted by AmericanSoldier View Post
    ...not scanning/monitoring your motor is like bangin a hooker and you just HOPE your not infected.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #111 Re: Dyno Results 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    Yes he used a plate. Which means it should be easy to make an IC plate. Especially easier for that bypass sticking down a little more. Use a solid or reasonably solid piece like the S3 old style WBS IC I had. It would make this a piece of cake.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #112 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The TVS swap goes heads up vs a full size IC + ported heads and GenV...

    Power - We'll say too close to call, edge to the TVS. However you could still do heads/IC with your TVS
    Cost - TVS wins
    Installation Difficulty - TVS wins (it's easier)
    Uniqueness - TVS wins
    Reliability - TVS wins
    Not giving ZZP your $ - TVS wins
    Blower Headroom - TVS spins reliably to 20,000rpm. GenV is kicked at 16,000.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #113 Re: Dyno Results 
    GXP Level Member Zef_66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,084
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    The TVS swap goes heads up vs a full size IC + ported heads and GenV...

    Power - We'll say too close to call, edge to the TVS. However you could still do heads/IC with your TVS
    Cost - TVS wins
    Installation Difficulty - TVS wins (it's easier)
    Uniqueness - TVS wins
    Reliability - TVS wins
    Not giving ZZP your $ - TVS wins
    Blower Headroom - TVS spins reliably to 20,000rpm. GenV is kicked at 16,000.
    Can you do a cost breakdown of it? Of those that you listed that the TVS wins, cost and reliability are the most important to me.
    2001 GSE
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #114 Re: Dyno Results 
    Moderator dsmuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Coldwater, OH
    Posts
    15,758
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    More reliable because it's a smaller blower so less heat?
    98 GTP modded 1.9's, sd headers, 3.4", zzp 1.0 230K miles scrapped.
    04 Comp G zzp stb's, UMI ta's, Speedbuilt sways, bully flo heads, XP, zzp headers, fsic, thrasher shift kit, 60#, 2.6" corsa 2.5", Inferno hood
    01 gt z7 turbo tep trans zzp motor
    08 g8 gt cam exhaust 11.87@118
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #115 Re: Dyno Results 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    spinning faster means less longevity?

    Being rated to be efficient enough to spin that high is something different.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #116 Re: Dyno Results 
    youtu.be/xhrBDcQq2DM FoSHO99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maquoketa, Iowa
    Posts
    2,943
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Intercooler cores/pumps can fail is what he's using for reliability factor.
    2001 GTP PT61 Turbo, E85, Stock Motor
    2011 Chevy Cruze MT6 1.4L Turbo
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #117 Re: Dyno Results 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Flow detect?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #118 Re: Dyno Results 
    Poppin 'em thangs mechguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,177
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by matt5112 View Post
    Flow detect?
    Even so. Still more reliable to not have a fluid system than to have one.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #119 Re: Dyno Results 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    If you want to get technical, not using a blower would be more reliable. Less likely to destroy a piston if you get bad gas.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #120 Re: Dyno Results 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    Whipple... how many people have a whipple setup? How many of those people showed gains from the m90 to the whipple with nothing else done?
    Do you do ANY research or do you just jump into things? This is straight from the whipple description on WBS.

    What kind of gains can be expected from installing a Whipple on my car? - This is where the true power of the Whipple is shown. On a stock car using just a Whipple kit Animul Performance was able to pull out a 13.3 second quarter mile pass. It's important to note that the average stock GTP does a ~14.5 - 14.8 quarter mile pass. This is over a full second improvement in ET with just the Whipple supercharger, on the old style Whipple supercharger no less! While we never recommend running a Whipple on a stock car, this shows the true potential of this supercharger. Results will be exponentially more impressive on modified cars.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 6 of 15 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. GTP Dyno Results!!!
    By OrangeL67 in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-17-2011, 11:25 PM
  2. ** Back from ZZP Trip - DYNO results **
    By Silver2kgtp in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-27-2011, 11:28 PM
  3. sexy results :)
    By BoostJunki3 in forum Visual/Body Modifications
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 05-12-2010, 08:48 PM
  4. results on the 07 ss
    By joe deleon in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-10-2009, 01:06 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •