If one (whom I am most certain does not exist) consistently donates monetarily more to GPF than the owner, I am sure that, if so desired, would be cause to request managerial responsibilities with regards to administrative permissions on his domain, though it would still thoroughly defy the spirit and intention of goodwill inherent in a donation to a nonprofit organization. Since the recent managerial decisions have been made, I have noticed no decrease in the quality of this organization's information, freely-given aid to users, or availability. It is my belief that these aforementioned decisions have been made responsibly and in sound mind using undisclosed criteria that, should it happen to be the same, has worked brilliantly in past endeavors, and leaves me with no misgivings about its success at present; so I can see no cause for complaint or further request by other users, regardless of their philanthropic past(s). Furthermore, should there be difficulties with the currently arranged system of responsibilities, I am most confident that they can and should remain, if you could excuse the idiom, a bridge to be crossed when arrived at and are thus should not be the remotest concern at present.Originally Posted by Pure2sin
