Poll: Too many moderators?

[Pure2sin]

I just am left wondering what the process was for choosing the new moderators? Some of those people you chose are more than qualified and I see as being great moderators. A few of the other people have me left wondering why they were chosen and who did the choosing? What were the criteria?

The plain of simple of it is this. Yes we needed more moderators but I think there should have been a nomination and voting process. If you are going to ask for money then the people giving the money should have a say on large issues like this.

[brandonl2000]

I just am left wondering what the process was for choosing the new moderators? Some of those people you chose are more than qualified and I see as being great moderators. A few of the other people have me left wondering why they were chosen and who did the choosing?

The plain of simple of it is this. Yes we needed more moderators but I think there should have been a nomination and voting process. If you are going to ask for money then the people giving the money should have a say on large issues like this.

lol, hmmm. moderator campaigns

[Pure2sin]

lol, hmmm. moderator campaigns

I am on other forums and that is how they did it. They also do a "Car of the month" which there is voting for also. Just something to think about.

It eliminates the *****ing and crying because everyone has an equal chance.

[SilvaMan61]

I am on other forums and that is how they did it. They also do a "Car of the month" which there is voting for also. Just something to think about.

It eliminates the *****ing and crying because everyone has an equal chance.

We did that equal chance voting whizz with the calendar.. People are still *****ing.. Just saying

[brandonl2000]

We did that equal chance voting whizz with the calendar.. People are still *****ing.. Just saying

yeah. i mean it's an interesting concept, but it's a forum not organized government. well, "organized."

so anyways, i like that they are chosen, they are chosen by people who have a good sense of people and their character etc. so i dont have a problem with it.

[SlowNA06]

the people giving the money should have a say on large issues like this.

If one (whom I am most certain does not exist) consistently donates monetarily more to GPF than the owner, I am sure that, if so desired, would be cause to request managerial responsibilities with regards to administrative permissions on his domain, though it would still thoroughly defy the spirit and intention of goodwill inherent in a donation to a nonprofit organization. Since the recent managerial decisions have been made, I have noticed no decrease in the quality of this organization's information, freely-given aid to users, or availability. It is my belief that these aforementioned decisions have been made responsibly and in sound mind using undisclosed criteria that, should it happen to be the same, has worked brilliantly in past endeavors, and leaves me with no misgivings about its success at present; so I can see no cause for complaint or further request by other users, regardless of their philanthropic past(s). Furthermore, should there be difficulties with the currently arranged system of responsibilities, I am most confident that they can and should remain, if you could excuse the idiom, a bridge to be crossed when arrived at and are thus should not be the remotest concern at present.

[Pure2sin]

Seriously? Who here is fronting more than Rocket's share? Cuz I want to be friends with a generous summbich like that. You ain't paying sh*t. You're donating. Suck it up and quick being greedy. Mod choices are no big deal. The boards are working just fine. Folks are learning cars and folks are helping them. That's the point. Go play outside or something.

First off. No need to be hard on the internet because you just come off sounding like an idiot.

I don't care either way. It has nothing to do with greed, complaining or crying, I was simply making an suggestion.

Grow up.

[SlowNA06]

Pure2Sin: I would like to sincerely apologize; I was careless and crass without provocation.

[02 WS6 TA]

If one (whom I am most certain does not exist) consistently donates monetarily more to GPF than the owner, I am sure that, if so desired, would be cause to request managerial responsibilities with regards to administrative permissions on his domain, though it would still thoroughly defy the spirit and intention of goodwill inherent in a donation to a nonprofit organization. Since the recent managerial decisions have been made, I have noticed no decrease in the quality of this organization's information, freely-given aid to users, or availability. It is my belief that these aforementioned decisions have been made responsibly and in sound mind using undisclosed criteria that, should it happen to be the same, has worked brilliantly in past endeavors, and leaves me with no misgivings about its success at present; so I can see no cause for complaint or further request by other users, regardless of their philanthropic past(s). Furthermore, should there be difficulties with the currently arranged system of responsibilities, I am most confident that they can and should remain, if you could excuse the idiom, a bridge to be crossed when arrived at and are thus should not be the remotest concern at present.

I just been skooled by the inventor of Scrabble.