Thread: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?)

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 82

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Dothan,AL.
    Posts
    7
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Should I install a cold air intake or just keep my old stock intake? Will I gain more horsepower? Will it throw off my computer to where it would cause other sensors to trip and not get the same performance? Will I still get the MPGs I'm getting now?cause my stepdad is a know it all and he told me that if I put the cold air intake on it would mess the car up and throw off the computer and get less horsepower.please give me some advice. Thank u for ur time reading this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Burlington, Wisconsin
    Posts
    285
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It will add horsepower.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    1,791
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I put one on and it did not seem to affect the sensors ran rough for a few miles then straightened itself out noticed about 3 miles less per tank full
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,022
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    1 more HP.

    Do some reading. It cant hurt anything.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    GrandPrix Junkie SeanGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Waterloo, Iowa
    Posts
    4,168
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It's a supporting mod. It won't mess anything up. Gains/losses will be unnoticeable. If you have a supercharger, it will make it whine. Otherwise, it's a cheap mod, go for it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Dothan,AL.
    Posts
    7
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Thank u guys for ur advice.should I bring it out by the front tire so it doesn't suck in the hot engine heat? That should help horses and make it a deeper growl.any way I should extend the intake that far and where should I position?and yes I have a eaton m90 SC. And can I drop down to a 3.4 or 3.6 pulley with stock headers without messing up anything?please drop some knowledge on me gentlemen......
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    GrandPrix Junkie SeanGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Waterloo, Iowa
    Posts
    4,168
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Doogie View Post
    Thank u guys for ur advice.should I bring it out by the front tire so it doesn't suck in the hot engine heat? That should help horses and make it a deeper growl.any way I should extend the intake that far and where should I position?and yes I have a eaton m90 SC. And can I drop down to a 3.4 or 3.6 pulley with stock headers without messing up anything?please drop some knowledge on me gentlemen......
    No. leave it how everyone else does, behind the driver headlight. It won't "growl" deeper or anything like that, and bringing it out by the tire will just result in it getting wet and getting water in the intake.
    You don't have stock headers, so get headers before dropping pulley sizes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    Donating User Odi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Chicago South Suburbs
    Posts
    5,928
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    these cars knock stock. headers before any other mod imho.
    2001 GT Special Edition - 208k miles, junkyard status. Part out in progress.
    2015 Mazda Mazda3 S Touring - 39000 miles, bone stock.
    Questions regarding LED's, headlights, HID's, taillights and more!? Click here.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    Moderator dsmuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Coldwater, OH
    Posts
    15,758
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It's not really a good idea to drop pulley sizes without throwing headers on it first.
    98 GTP modded 1.9's, sd headers, 3.4", zzp 1.0 230K miles scrapped.
    04 Comp G zzp stb's, UMI ta's, Speedbuilt sways, bully flo heads, XP, zzp headers, fsic, thrasher shift kit, 60#, 2.6" corsa 2.5", Inferno hood
    01 gt z7 turbo tep trans zzp motor
    08 g8 gt cam exhaust 11.87@118
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Intake will skew maf so that youll run leaner.

    Might get a little power from that.

    Scan before you drop. That is all.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    GXP Level Member JoRoW99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Grand Island, Nebraska
    Posts
    2,015
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The fuel trims will make up for the extra air coming in, it wont mess up the sensors or computer or anything. Basically the computer self adjusts.
    '01 GT - Top swapped. ported SC/Heads/TB, SD headers, open cone, HPTuners, 3.4 MPS, 60#'s, E85.______________________SMGPFC #99_______________________
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    GTP Level Member wa04compg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Puyallup WA
    Posts
    1,747
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Read the modding thread! Headers/Intake...scan...pulley drop if 0 KR...tune!!!!
    04 Comp G - XP Bolt ons....boring Slow...SOLD
    08 G8 GT - exhaust Tune
    99 Silverado - 5.3 Exhaust Tune
    01 Suburban - 5.3 Intake Exhaust Tune
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13  
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JoRoW99 View Post
    The fuel trims will make up for the extra air coming in, it wont mess up the sensors or computer or anything. Basically the computer self adjusts.
    Doesnt adjust well to wot.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    Donating Users smitz327's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    368
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I installed a cold air intake in my 2000 GT and gas mileage got worse plus the sound of it is kind of like tinny if you understand me. As soon as a get a chance, I am going back to stock
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    Moderator DanPrixGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Grand Rapids, Michigan
    Posts
    5,488
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by smitz327 View Post
    I installed a cold air intake in my 2000 GT and gas mileage got worse plus the sound of it is kind of like tinny if you understand me. As soon as a get a chance, I am going back to stock
    I dont get your logic.

    I dont think an intake will make much of a difference.
    '97 GTP - Stage 2 Heads, 90# Springs, 1.9 Harland Sharp Rockers, Gen V, 3.0, Intake, N* TB, LQ4, FSIC, 10.5mm Wires, Poly Mounts, SLP Headers, Borla Exaust, Built Trans - SOLD*

    '08 G8 GT - 6.7L 408CI Stroker, 239/254 Cam, Fast Intake, 102mm TB, CAI, Full Exhaust.





    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    Moderator dsmuts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Coldwater, OH
    Posts
    15,758
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It shouldn't make any difference at all.
    98 GTP modded 1.9's, sd headers, 3.4", zzp 1.0 230K miles scrapped.
    04 Comp G zzp stb's, UMI ta's, Speedbuilt sways, bully flo heads, XP, zzp headers, fsic, thrasher shift kit, 60#, 2.6" corsa 2.5", Inferno hood
    01 gt z7 turbo tep trans zzp motor
    08 g8 gt cam exhaust 11.87@118
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    GT Level Member Shiftingshaddow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    KC
    Posts
    355
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    they look cool. and you can wash them. but i don't see how it could help anything unless you had some way of getting air straight into it. it seems like it might actually be worse because there isn't a direct path to it from where the air comes in behind the head light. i also don't understand why its called a cold air intake. its pretty hot under the hood and since it is an open cylinder it seems like it will mostly get hot engine air.

    and given that several people above said it doesn't make a difference, then what is the point for performance? how does this help with other mods? is it because it supposed to introduce more air into the intake?

    to kind of piggy back on that.....the claims that are made is that they will add horsepower and add fuel mileage. then why aren't they oem?

    all that said, i think i will build one and put it in because it looks cool. if it makes anything worse i will take it off.
    2001 GTP Special Edition
    ZZP DP with Cat, Open Cone Intake, ZZP 1.0 PCM, 3.4 pulley, AL 104s, Rocker Panel Delete.....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    GTX Level Member Travisgt2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    leavenworth ks
    Posts
    1,745
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Shiftingshaddow View Post
    they look cool. and you can wash them. but i don't see how it could help anything unless you had some way of getting air straight into it. it seems like it might actually be worse because there isn't a direct path to it from where the air comes in behind the head light. i also don't understand why its called a cold air intake. its pretty hot under the hood and since it is an open cylinder it seems like it will mostly get hot engine air.
    .
    i have one on mine dont notice difference right away but have noticed slight better mpg also i get lots of sticks leaves and other crap under my filter on the pcm and little crap on the filter so yea theres plenty of air getting to it if that crap can get to it lol also ive ran my car at 109mph for 18 miles so like 20 min straight and when i got home my exhast was cherry red but my intake tube and the metal on the filter were ice cold.
    04 GT2: 180 t-stat, cold air intake, reptile tune, plog, hv3, gt1 cam, 90#springs, new push rods, new lifters, port polished heads, lim, uim and tb, 06 Impala brakes and steel brake lines. Cosmetic: black roof rails, under glow, Pontiac ground light, blue hud dic radio controls and cluster. To come custom hood.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    I live here. MoarkatsINmuhtrailer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,150
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by travisgt2 View Post
    also ive ran my car at 109mph for 18 miles so like 20 min straight and when i got home my exhast was cherry red but my intake tube and the metal on the filter were ice cold.
    Uhhh why?



    An intake is not gonna give you more power. Throttle response will be more snappy but that is what your mind equates into more power.

    The reason for an intake is to allow for a larger volume of air.

    What people don't realize is, that when the engineers designed everything, they made parts that were going to give that engine the best performance it can..

    For example, my wrx, the factory intake on it is good up to around 400 hp.. That's a lot. And with a good filter on a 3800, just like our catback being good for around 300-350 wheel (400chp)...These intakes can be very useful till around that power level before becoming a restriction.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Cold air intake Vs. stock intake (which is better?) 
    GTX Level Member Travisgt2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    leavenworth ks
    Posts
    1,745
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 99PGPGT View Post
    Uhhh why? .
    wanted to get home asap and when i did i thought man i wonder how hot this thing got and wanted to see so no real reason i know are cars arnt really ment to do those kinds of things but hey i beat and beat and see what it takes lol it went from a normal 20 min or so drive to a 9 min drive was fun.( no no one else was on the road i only take my only life into my hands when do such things i dont ever want to take a chanc of kiling some one so if i even see one vehicle i stop going that fast)
    04 GT2: 180 t-stat, cold air intake, reptile tune, plog, hv3, gt1 cam, 90#springs, new push rods, new lifters, port polished heads, lim, uim and tb, 06 Impala brakes and steel brake lines. Cosmetic: black roof rails, under glow, Pontiac ground light, blue hud dic radio controls and cluster. To come custom hood.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Cold Air Intake
    By DanPrixGTP in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 03-09-2012, 09:39 PM
  2. Cold-Air Intake
    By SoergBot in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-15-2011, 04:09 PM
  3. Short Ram Air intake or Cold Air Intake
    By slopez in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-01-2011, 10:08 PM
  4. Puttin Cold Air Intake filter in place of stock air breather.
    By Hawkins97 in forum 3.1L V6 (LHO/LG8)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-16-2010, 11:24 AM
  5. Help with Cold Air Intake
    By Biohazardvi in forum Introductions/Noob Questions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-02-2010, 08:30 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •