Here's my .02 cents, and I'm sure no one cares, but I'll say it anyways.
*First off, I've never put a cam in my car and don't plan on it
soon
but I have ridden in cars with an aftermarket cam. What I'm going to say is based off opinion and research from what I've done.
The VS cam has great potential and is one of the easiest, if not the easiest cam on the valvetrain.
According
to ZZP, it was designed for stock valvetrain, but I wouldn't ever do that nor do I advise it what so ever. From what I've learned, the VS cam has great potential in the lower powerband. Better for acceleration from 0-60+ (Don't quote me on this). Chris Hinson made a write up comparing the XP/S1X/VS cams and his overall "winner" was the VS because of it's potential and easy driveability. But all cams can be DD'd. Just ask Nick about DDing his Thrasher cam.
If my research is
correct
and the VS is better for the lower powerband, I wouldn't get it for that reason. These car's have a blower on the engine, and are torque monsters. Going 0-60+ really isn't an issue for these cars. But highway pulls and these cars fall on there face, completely. So I'd get a cam that will yield more power in the upper powerband, such as the XP/S1X, compared to the VS. But it really all depends on where you're driving. Whether it's mainly city, highway, or a mixture of both. So my opinion is based of highway driving, since I do it everyday.
If I were ever to spend the money/time on a cam, I would make sure it was worth my time. Even though the VS has good potential, I would want something "bigger," and I would most definitely want the choppy lope from a
larger
cam. I'd NEVER cam my car with something that doesn't lope. Defeats half the purpose for me even doing it lol.
Once again, I probably don't know what I am talking about and could be pulling this out of my ass. So take it with a grain of salt.