Thread: New mods

This is not something worth fighting over.

Originally Posted by Dawings33

This is not something worth fighting over.

Wel, i'm not mad at all. Just having a friendly discussion in my opinion. I'm sure you're on CGP and i know you're new to THIS forum, But here typically everyone gets along here. So you don't have to worry about threads like this getting out of hand over here.


Usually everybody in the discussion learns something new any way.



But going back to what you said....


---Quote---
Idk ZZP has done some testing that says otherwise.
---End Quote---
CFM using 1 inch of vacuum
(higher numbers indicate more flow)
238 5" of straight 4" PCV
220 26" of straight 4" PVC
183 Above tube with added 90 deg bend
205 9" long 4" inlet dirty K&N filter
227 9" long 4" inlet clean K&N
181 7" long 3.5" inlet clean K&N
168 LS6 MAF with screen in
191 LS6 MAF w/o screen
159 26" PVC, 90 deg bend, LS6 MAF (no screen), 9" K&N
94 Stock GT TB with screen
104 Stock GT TB w/o screen
107 Stock GTP TB with screen
119 Stock GTP TB w/o screen
123 S1 GT HVTB w/o screen
138 S1 GTP HVTB w/o screen
from zzp site

seems the shorter intake tube flows better other than that anyone can use what they belive is best for their applications

.................................................. .................................................. .........................

Like i was saying....I realize a shorter tube or one without a 90* can flow BETTER but that better flow is not NEEDED with our cars.


In other words what im saying is that our cars can never out flow a 4'' pipe...Nothing in the 11's anyway.


Maybe i did the math wrong....If so i would love to be corrected....Shoot if i could take the intake off of my car and put an open cone and gain HP then i'd also love to do that