Thread: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1 Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    GTX Level Member Elite6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Cambridge, Ontario Canada
    Posts
    798
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    See mods in my sig, starting to think about getting a proper custom tune from overkill. However, given the fixed cost of the tune I am considering a mod or 2 before that.

    SSIC, ported SC, injectors & maybe a 3.1? (whatever doesn't yield KR)

    This is a daily driver for me & I am not overly interested in putting in a new transmission if it blows because of shear power output. Will these mods & extra HP roast this tranny in the not so distant future, where is the breaking point typically? I don't drive the car hard very often & may hit the track once a year.

    Options that need to keep the trans together:

    1) SSIC, Ported SC, injectors & say 3.1, custom tune (hoping low low 13's)
    2) 3.4, custom tune (hoping high 13's)
    2005 E55 - stock
    1999 GTP 2dr - 9" HAI | Headers | 1.84's | 3.4 | Ported SC|
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    We can't answer the broken trans question. Your right foot and how you drive effects the trans more than mods.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    GXP Level Member txslow6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,652
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Do yourself a favor and skip the SSIC BS and go straight to a fullsize. The SSIC isn't worth the money and you will hit a wall with it. That was one of my biggest regrets when I was doing a S/C build. If you have any concern with the trans going out don't even bother modding.
    85 Corvette
    01 TA
    03 Z06
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    GTX Level Member EJOUIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Newnan, GA
    Posts
    1,193
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It will be harder to break the trans with a 3.4 setup compared to a 3.1.
    97 GT white 4 door-SOLD

    Cherry 2005 Impala LS- Front and Rear GMPP Strut Tower Braces
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    Not necessarily. I swapped a trans with Steve this weekend. He's totally stock L36 and has gone through 8 transmissions. That's how hard he beats on them.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    GTX Level Member EJOUIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Newnan, GA
    Posts
    1,193
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BillBoost37 View Post
    Not necessarily. I swapped a trans with Steve this weekend. He's totally stock L36 and has gone through 8 transmissions. That's how hard he beats on them.
    That's not keeping the driver variable constant.
    97 GT white 4 door-SOLD

    Cherry 2005 Impala LS- Front and Rear GMPP Strut Tower Braces
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Turbo is the way to go. REDCRAPGP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Behind you...sike made you look Bish
    Posts
    16,085
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    8 transmission..Jesus! I probably would of gave up after the 3rd. Then again Bill isn't available in my neighborhood.
    Squirrels are my engine. I need a Ford Regal
    04 Comp G.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    GTX Level Member Elite6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Cambridge, Ontario Canada
    Posts
    798
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by EJOUIE View Post
    It will be harder to break the trans with a 3.4 setup compared to a 3.1.

    That doesn't get to the point, more power obviously equals more chance of destroying all else constant. My point is similar to a well tuned motor. Lets say the limit of the stock internals with a perfect tune is 350whp. After that things start blowing up no matter what you do. Same question for the trans, does the 280whp+ range start breaking it apart no matter what? If the 3.1 I/C setup would be in that neighbourhood then I will opt for the 3.4

    Lets assume I drive normally 95% of the time, the other 5% I would be WOT or accelerating hard

    Not expecting a perfect answer just a reasonable expectation. With my current basic mods the tranny seems perfectly content.
    2005 E55 - stock
    1999 GTP 2dr - 9" HAI | Headers | 1.84's | 3.4 | Ported SC|
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    GTX Level Member EJOUIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Newnan, GA
    Posts
    1,193
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    From what I hear on this forum, sh!t hits the fan at 300+whp.
    97 GT white 4 door-SOLD

    Cherry 2005 Impala LS- Front and Rear GMPP Strut Tower Braces
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    GXP Level Member GTPpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Schuyler, NE
    Posts
    2,972
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    23
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It depends on how you drive, and how your trans is tuned. I make close to, if not over 400whp on my stock transmission with 165k miles and lots of track passes on slicks.


    2001 GTP Drag Car - XPZ, Tischler heads, Upsidedown M90 IC'd, e85, Gen V, 2.3 w/ 5%OD
    2005 F350 6.0 - studded, deleted, tuned
    2001 GTP - cam, headers, nitrous, stock trans - 11.83 @ 116 <$2k in mods - sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    I live here. SlowNA06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    5,928
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Was your KR so high that you needed AL104's with a stock pulley?
    But yeah... how badly you beat your car will show in your transmission, not how much money you put in the engine.
    Irridium spark plugs last 100k mi and work just as well as copper. Copper is a waste on N/A and only lasts 15k mi. Don't use Platinum.
    Use 195* tstat unless you can thoroughly explain why not; 99.9% don't need a lower temp.
    Almost any oil filter, ever, is of higher quality than ACDelco. Spend $6+.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    GTX Level Member Elite6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Cambridge, Ontario Canada
    Posts
    798
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SlowNA06 View Post
    Was your KR so high that you needed AL104's with a stock pulley
    Got AL's to pulley down but because of the cooler weather kept the stock pulley & never switched up the AL's
    2005 E55 - stock
    1999 GTP 2dr - 9" HAI | Headers | 1.84's | 3.4 | Ported SC|
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    GTX Level Member Elite6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Cambridge, Ontario Canada
    Posts
    798
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by GTPpower View Post
    It depends on how you drive, and how your trans is tuned.
    I generally drive mine very easy, what "tuning" could I do to experience your luck with the stocker?
    2005 E55 - stock
    1999 GTP 2dr - 9" HAI | Headers | 1.84's | 3.4 | Ported SC|
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Intercooling & pulley down VS stock transmission 
    GXP Level Member GTPpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Schuyler, NE
    Posts
    2,972
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    23
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Take it easy on shift line pressure, keep somewhat of a delay in the shift delay table.

    Also, avoid 40mph downshifts into 1st gear and don't install a shift kit.


    2001 GTP Drag Car - XPZ, Tischler heads, Upsidedown M90 IC'd, e85, Gen V, 2.3 w/ 5%OD
    2005 F350 6.0 - studded, deleted, tuned
    2001 GTP - cam, headers, nitrous, stock trans - 11.83 @ 116 <$2k in mods - sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. WTB: BETTER than stock Transmission
    By LowRidinCrew in forum Wanted To Buy - Parts
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-16-2012, 02:16 PM
  2. Intercooling
    By GP_Kid18 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 09-14-2008, 10:56 PM
  3. PCV and Intercooling
    By TooMch in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-28-2008, 11:21 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •