In the videos they claim that the Eatons suffer from bearing failure due to heat. I've seen plenty 200,000+ mile gen 3 blowers still running fine.
|
In the videos they claim that the Eatons suffer from bearing failure due to heat. I've seen plenty 200,000+ mile gen 3 blowers still running fine.
the snout is where all the heat of the blower comes from, by cooling the snout itself you help lower the temp of the blower itself in turn helping to lower your intake temps even more. Also even if you are running a phenolic you are still going to get heat transfer from the motor to the blower (not as much but it is still there) by keeping the whole blower cooler you eliminate heat soak which will take hp from you, and with a hotter blower you are going to be breaking down the oil and putting more stress on the bearings in the snout.
what size pullies where these 200,xxx miled blowers running? i run a 2.7 and I am pretty sure that mine will not last 200,xxx miles
Whhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhat!?!?! Most of the heat, in a supercharger, comes from the snout!? This statement alone makes no sense. Most people understand that two large rotors spinning at high speeds within .001 mm of each other is where most of the heat comes from. Yea, the snout does generate SOME heat, but not nearly as much as the rotors themselves.
And looking at our roots blower..........the snout isn't even CONNECTED to the LIM................so any heat produced at the snout has to go through the case of the blower to get to the LIM, etc, etc....heatsoak. Why try to put a fire out with a water bottle, when I can put it out with a bucket of water?
Your logic is way off dude. The heat from the supercharger has nothing to do with "the rotors spinning 1mm from each other". I mean "really"? Heat in a supercharger comes from compressing the air (in a supercharger it's called "adiabatic efficiancy"), heat transfer from the engines combustion, and from the friction in the front gear drive. That transfers to the rest of the case which is why we typically see higher temps by the front drive than at the TB side of the case. Again, a lot of conjecture here without looking at what is actually happening or even understanding how things work. And yet people pass themselves off as "experts" lol.
Has anyone watched the videos on Youtube? I think they explain how it works and show the temp differences. And that car is equipped with a "killer chiller" which was'nt even in use for the vid. When the KC was used in conjuction with the VC on the SC equipped with a SB the case was actually COLD to the touch after some spirited driving.
I will say it again. WHO CARES how cold the case is....The air coming out of it is the main thing.
If you don't have a IAT in your LIM then this thread is on it's way to epic fail.
What has failed to have been explained so far is:
How does cooling the snout cool the charge coming out of the blower?
Last edited by Pure2sin; 04-07-2012 at 02:37 PM.
A root style Eaton blower doesn't compress air nearly as much as a twin screw blower................so for you to tell me I don't even know what I'm talking about, and then say something like that, is complete hypocrisy.
But you're right, most of the heat that is generated is from the "compressing of air" and the two rotors spinning (exactly what I already said)........... So how is cooling a supercharger snout.........a piece that is totally isolated from the rotors, something that is going to increase efficiency??? You typically see higher temperatures by the snout because it is at the opposite end of the air intake..........therefore isn't being introduced to fresh, cooler air like the TB side of the blower. Yea, some heat is definitely generated by the snout, but not nearly enough to say a snout cooler is necessary. Many of us running full core intercoolers have superchargers that are "cool to the touch" after spirited driving.
You shouldn't throw statements like " adiabatic efficiency" around if you don't know how to spell them..........or how it relates to the M90 roots supercharger we have on our platform. You see, adiabatic efficiency correlates directly with how much work a compressor has to do to compress air to a specific point. Only problem with your logic is the M90 roots supercharger does NOT do that much compressing!! Unlike a twin screw supercharger or a centrifugal supercharger, the amount of compression that is generated is minimal. Actually, the roots style blower is by far the least efficient type available. Cooling the snout will not increase efficiency of the blower..............
So, Why do I need a snout cooler? Some people make the point that cooling that area will increase the efficiency of the bearings and coupler, therefore increasing their life span......I've only heard of a handful of snout bearing failures because of fatigue (a lot of bearing failure is because of improper pulley installation / removal), and I've NEVER heard of a supercharger coupler failure because of high heat and fatigue............
BTW, did you know I built a supercharger dynomometer? Yeah, I worked with an EE (retired from Boeing and IBM) on the software to map these superchargers (and others) to see the benefits of port design and the effects of heat and air density on their output. Here is a video link of me running it on Bobs website_- Dyno of Eaton Supercharger on SXF1000 - YouTube and it was constructed and designed completely by me to SAE J1723_199508 standards Superchargers - SAE Standards and I've done extensive testing with it. It's loud, you'd like it.
I guess what I'm trying to convey here is that I'm not talking out my ass. Stiege was'nt even going to offer these to the GP community until I proposed it and he agreed to make the prototypes for stlmo_gtp and I. There might not be any others if there is no interest. We were just putting them out there as a feeler. Please, if your interested it would be best to contact Stiege personally. I will start a list and when we get to a certain amount of units we will do a group buy if there is enough interest. Thanks to those that have PM'd me to stay out of the fray, and to those who hate, have a nice day!
For those curious about that SAE standard which you have to pay $66 to view a copy of it:
http://www.vortechsuperchargers.com/...ency_paper.pdf
Curious about the following though:J1723 – An Overview
J1723 applies to the various types of available superchargers, including roots,
screw/lysholm, and centrifugal-type products. It applies to bench testing and has been
adopted by the SAE to specify, among others:
• A standard basis for supercharger efficiency rating
• Reference inlet air supply test conditions
• A method for correcting observed efficiency to standard conditions
• A method for presenting test results in an accurate and usable way
• A method to compare superchargers without the effects of engine dynamics and
intercooling
Strict requirements are set forth regarding the necessary laboratory equipment, test
measurement and accuracy, installation of the test article(s), test conditions, and
presentation of results. Some of the important instrumentation requirements include:
• Test Sections – Appropriately matched inlet and discharge test sections, of
specified diameter and length, must be used. Each of these shall be equipped
with multiple temperature and pressure probes installed at precise locations.
Pressure measurements shall be +/- 0.5 kPa (generally 0.1%) accuracy or better.
It is further required that the discharge test section be insulated between the
supercharger and at least 1 diameter beyond the outlet temperature
measurement location.
• Inlet Flow – A flow measurement device, with 1% or better accuracy is required.
• Torque Meter – +/- 0.5% or better accuracy required. This is for measuring
mechanical drive power to the supercharger and determining mechanical
efficiency.
• Speed/Tachometer – +/- 0.2% or better accuracy. During tests, input test speed
shall not deviate more than +/- 0.2%, or +/- 10 revs/min, whichever is greater.
Stabilization Requirement
In order to obtain accurate and repeatable results, the supercharger must be operated at
a fixed speed and flow setting, and all temperature readings must completely stabilize
before a data point can be logged. Stabilization is essential in order to obtain accurate
and repeatable measurements. Further, and in the case of testing centrifugal
compressors, thermal stabilization means minimum heat transfer from the compressed
air occurs, and the adiabatic assumption is supported. Given these, and only these
conditions, an accurate and repeatable efficiency measurement can be made.
Some Misconceptions
Believe it or not, there are some in the supercharger industry who contend that the J1723
standard is flawed and inappropriate for evaluating automotive supercharger products
because it “…does not account for the dynamic operation of a supercharger in actual
use.” This is further compounded by the belief that a supercharger may conversely run
cooler, i.e., somehow become more efficient when operating on the vehicle, even though
it tests poorly in the test cell. This erroneous thinking is apparently due to the
requirement that the supercharger be operated at fixed speed, flow, and pressure until
fully stabilized, before a data point can be logged, per the standard. This is quite unlike
the normal, dynamic operation when installed on a vehicle. Interestingly, other test codes
such as the ASME PTC-10 also require stabilization; this particular test code has been a
mainstay of industrial compressor testing for decades. Nonetheless, such arguments
readily collapse given the following realizations:
• Efficiency performance is entirely dependent on the design of the compressor –
poorly designed compressors perform poorly, whether operation is continuous
and stabilized, or dynamic.
• Given the same input drive speed and air-flow rate, a compressor will not
consume any less drive power when installed under the hood, than it does in the
test cell.
• A more efficient compressor, on the other hand, will always deliver cooler charge
air and consume less engine power than an inefficient compressor, at the same
(flow and pressure) operating point. This fact holds whether the compressor is
running continuously at the operating point, or rapidly “sweeps” through it.
I didn't see anything in your video showing the test bench to this effect.• Test Sections – Appropriately matched inlet and discharge test sections, of
specified diameter and length, must be used. Each of these shall be equipped
with multiple temperature and pressure probes installed at precise locations.
Pressure measurements shall be +/- 0.5 kPa (generally 0.1%) accuracy or better.
It is further required that the discharge test section be insulated between the
supercharger and at least 1 diameter beyond the outlet temperature
measurement location.
• Inlet Flow – A flow measurement device, with 1% or better accuracy is required.
I guess Kenne Bell and Whipple don't know what they're talking about when they say you can't "dyno or flow" a supercharger. Oh by the way if a supercharger flows a lot it doesn't mean crap on the car. I test ON THE DYNO SAME DAY TESTING WITH THE CAR STAYING STRAPPED DOWN. That and the Track are the only 2 places to test imo. That's also why I don't have a flow bench. I don't sell AIR.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Tags for this Thread |