Quote Originally Posted by darkhorizon View Post
both will result in about the same end goal for power.

A ZZP pcm would work pretty darn good as is if you just bolted an intercooler on.

I think that even your most crazy cam/intercooled setups are dirt slow so I would probably suggest an intercooler over a cam as it is a pretty good upgrade for cheap. In reality, you can do an intercooler for much cheaper and easier than you can properly and reliably do a cam.

Throw some modded 1.9 rockers and headers on the intercooler setup and you could make well over 300whp.... which will also make more torque than a NIC cam, and usually it will be more horsepower than a NIC cam car makes. MPG/tuning is also better/easier.
Do you have to go around beating your chest in every thread? The OP is asking for help on deciding between a CAM and and IC. He's not asking for big bad feiro boy to come in saying his setup is, was and always will be "dirt slow". Are you that insecure with yourself that you feel the need to be such a jerk to people asking innocent questions?

Not only do you act in an immature manner towards people who could care less what your rattle trap car makes for power... but you are giving him false information as well! You say "oh your car will be dirt slow, so because of that reason I say go IC"

Read it! That's what you gave for advice!

OP please disregard this guys input... he's got no idea what he's talking about. A proper cammed (xp/nic/s1x) setup will outperform an intercooled setup on our cars EVERY TIME.