i meant eaton roots superchargers. if the gains are so proven why have m90s consistently made more power in our engines?
----- M112 -----
Intense's Cam Motion Nitrous/Blower Grind:
1. JohnT w/ 411WHP (I/C, IS3 Heads)
Intense's Cam Motion Stage 3 Grind:
1. JohnT w/ 400WHP (I/C, IS3 Heads)
Stattama's Comp Cam SS4 Cam Grind:
1. 97gtpracecar w/ 404WHP (I/C, ZZP S3 heads)
M90s
Intense's Cam Motion Stage 3 Grind:
1. Ted Quartana w/ 399WHP (G5 m-90, IS3 Heads, I/C)
Intense's Cam Motion Stage 4 Grind:
1. Tim King w/ 411WHP (G5 m-90, IS3 Heads, I/C) [STD]
ZZP's Comp Cam XPZ grind:
1. Zooomer w/ 464WHP (I/C, G5 m-90, ZZP Alum Heads, 10.5:1) [STD / Mustang Dyno]
2. Scott Kleis w/ 425WHP (I/C, G5 m-90, ZZP Alum Heads, 9:5:1) [STD]
3. Fred Cakanic w/ 421WHP (I/C, G5 m-90, ZZP S3 Heads, 9.5:1) [STD]
4. ALancour w/ 400WHP (I/C, G5 m-90, ZZP Alum Heads 10:1) [SAE / Mustang Dyno]
5. House w/ 393WHP (non-I/C, G5 m-90, ZZP S4 Alum Heads, 1.7 rockers)
ClubGP Message Forum troubleshooting
that doesn't look like proven gains to me