Thread: Pictures of Modified SD Headers (using jig)

Results 1 to 20 of 58

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 Re: Pictures of Modified SD Headers (using jig) 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Ottawa ON, Canada
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    would u say 3" exhaust or 2.5" for 3.8L S/C ?
    I will def have a glasspack/resonator,
    but 3", the car would be loud as hell wouldnt it...?
    _______________________
    2002 Acura Rsx Type S - K20A2
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Pictures of Modified SD Headers (using jig) 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,022
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    3in will line up/weld up perfect.

    Just stick with your stock cat-back and either swap the res for glasspack or just leave it.

    In my personal opinion I wouldnt change the mufflers either unless you do borla, because flowmasters and maganflow exhaust will drone.

    The reason I stay keep you stock cat-back size is because it flows perfectly fine up to around 350 WHP which is a crap load and I doubt you will ever reach that point.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Modified exhaust??
    By qksilver in forum The Rant Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 12-02-2010, 11:37 AM
  2. Modified '97 TB?
    By DanGTP in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-08-2008, 10:57 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •