Thread: Cam vs. Boost?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 30
  1. #1 Cam vs. Boost? 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Atlanta Ga
    Posts
    118
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Since installing the VS cam i seem to have dropped down to 5lbs of boost. I could have sworn it was at 6 or 7 before. Stock pulley. Does the cam have any effect on boost levels?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,030
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    more flow = less boost

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    The mod from over yonder TheOtherNick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Charles City, IA
    Posts
    9,955
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yeah a cam will drop the boost pressure, I really hope some one is helping you tune.
    01 gtp-big cam e85 dd 78dodge- guzzling fuel 05 cummins- rollin coal
    SMGPFC Two Nipple General
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Less boost is actually better.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    Donating Users gtpsleeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    Less boost is actually better.
    to a certain extent...

    Just think of boost as a girl... you dont wanna have sex with the 200lb girl, but you dont want an anorexic girl either right?

    its all about finding something in the middle that works best for you
    "My car is a racecar like Planet Fitness is a gym...."

    proud mark VIII victim!!! suck it...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    GT Level Member 04boostedindyss's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    boynton beach florida
    Posts
    170
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    the motor is breathing more efficiently with the cam hence the boost loss which is completely normal...now tune and pulley drop
    E85, Gen V, Xp, Supporting mods, crap tune!

    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Atlanta Ga
    Posts
    118
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yeah im getting it dyno tuned, just have to finish the rewire for the fuel pump. Just wanted to make sure im good before i take it to tuner. I got the mps system so i can try diff pulleys while tuning.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    GT Level Member 04boostedindyss's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    boynton beach florida
    Posts
    170
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Good deal, what are your other mods btw
    E85, Gen V, Xp, Supporting mods, crap tune!

    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    GrandPrix Junkie redlinepontiac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Waukesha, WI
    Posts
    4,791
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gtpsleeper View Post
    to a certain extent...

    Just think of boost as a girl... you dont wanna have sex with the 200lb girl, but you dont want an anorexic girl either right?

    its all about finding something in the middle that works best for you

    Greatest thing ive heard all night haha
    RayRay
    92 Turbo miata
    71 bagged lemans wagon
    02 lexus is300
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    GrandPrix Junkie PurpleGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Never Never Land
    Posts
    4,864
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    10
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    To a certain extent? What do you mean? The less boost the more effecienctly it's flowing.
    In the case of this cam it allowed more flow, thus less boost. You already know that.
    Im confused why you think boost needs to be in the middle. The lower your boost the better the system if flowing.(Usually. You could have a vac leak but that's diff)
    Boost doesn't mean a whole lot. It tells you how good(or bad) your system flows.
    2001 Regal GS, PLOG, 3" DP, 1.9's/L76 springs. 21* of timing on a 3.4"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 4THGENCAMAROFAN View Post
    To a certain extent? What do you mean? The less boost the more effecienctly it's flowing.
    In the case of this cam it allowed more flow, thus less boost. You already know that.
    Im confused why you think boost needs to be in the middle. The lower your boost the better the system if flowing.(Usually. You could have a vac leak but that's diff)
    Boost doesn't mean a whole lot. It tells you how good(or bad) your system flows.
    It's a balance, dude. If your logic was on, we'd all run M45s at 4psi.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    club of used to own a gp 99prixgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    4,643
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    these cars are best at around 12psi
    16' wrx sti- stock
    06 Spice Red GTO- m6/exhaust/tune/suspension/377whp-383tq-sold
    99 silvermist gp gt-g5/xp/IC/3.0mps-parted&sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 99prixgt View Post
    these cars are best at around 12psi
    This is also an arbitrary number.
    Stock cars have horrible knock at only 8psi.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    GTX Level Member Juanmiguel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    1,166
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I get 7 pounds with vs cam and 3.25 pulley
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    Donating Users gtpsleeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 4THGENCAMAROFAN View Post
    To a certain extent? What do you mean? The less boost the more effecienctly it's flowing.
    In the case of this cam it allowed more flow, thus less boost. You already know that.
    Im confused why you think boost needs to be in the middle. The lower your boost the better the system if flowing.(Usually. You could have a vac leak but that's diff)
    Boost doesn't mean a whole lot. It tells you how good(or bad) your system flows.
    if thats the case then i guess I should run my E85 on a stock pulley...

    thats like saying 6-8 psi of boost on a 3.8 pulley is the same as 6-8 psi of boost on a 3.0 pulley... its just wrong
    "My car is a racecar like Planet Fitness is a gym...."

    proud mark VIII victim!!! suck it...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    GrandPrix Junkie PurpleGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Never Never Land
    Posts
    4,864
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    10
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    I kind of understand how my logic is flawed.
    I do understand that 6-8 PSI on a 3.8" and a 3.0" is diff though. A 3.0" running the same "boost" as a 3.8" is gonna make more power..at least theoretically it should.
    2001 Regal GS, PLOG, 3" DP, 1.9's/L76 springs. 21* of timing on a 3.4"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    Donating Users gtpsleeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 4THGENCAMAROFAN View Post
    I kind of understand how my logic is flawed.
    I do understand that 6-8 PSI on a 3.8" and a 3.0" is diff though. A 3.0" running the same "boost" as a 3.8" is gonna make more power..at least theoretically it should.
    exactly... the 6-8 psi on a stock pulley is pushing a certain amount of boost through... where as the the 3.0 will push MORE air through at ( in theory ) colder temperatures to give you the same amount of pressure but with twice as much air...

    its hard to explain but its all basically thermodynamics...
    "My car is a racecar like Planet Fitness is a gym...."

    proud mark VIII victim!!! suck it...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    GrandPrix Junkie PurpleGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Never Never Land
    Posts
    4,864
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    10
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    But given a certain pulley size. We'll say a 3.0". If your making 8 PSI vs 5 PSI the 5 PSI may be less "boost" BUT it should be a colder boost and create more power, once again, int theory. Correct? Or am I wrong?
    2001 Regal GS, PLOG, 3" DP, 1.9's/L76 springs. 21* of timing on a 3.4"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I was once told by a guy who does plenty of tuning on these cars that there are boost levels you'd want to see.

    IIRC:

    10-12 psi for low comp.

    same for high comp with intercooling.

    7-9 for high comp, no intercool.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Cam vs. Boost? 
    Donating Users gtpsleeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Lawrence, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    1,351
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 4THGENCAMAROFAN View Post
    But given a certain pulley size. We'll say a 3.0". If your making 8 PSI vs 5 PSI the 5 PSI may be less "boost" BUT it should be a colder boost and create more power, once again, int theory. Correct? Or am I wrong?
    wrong...

    if you keep a constant pulley size and add flow mods to drop from 8 - 5 psi your air temp is going to be cooler yes but your still having the same amount of air being pushed in regardless of its temperature... your still basically getting the same amount of air into the combustion chamber as before though...

    that being said, remember that this isn ALL about psi... the other half is spark. Remember, spark ( especially at WOT ) is limited for safety of our engines...

    the thinking here is that you wanna have the most air in the combustion chamber with the highest degree of spark for optimal power...

    Think of it like this (im explaining this as easy i can sorry) if your running 20-22 degrees of timing on a 3.1 knock free, you will make MORE power on a 3.0 knock free with the same timing due to added air into the combustion chamber...

    make since?
    "My car is a racecar like Planet Fitness is a gym...."

    proud mark VIII victim!!! suck it...
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. L67 no boost! (help)
    By illtacticz in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 12-17-2010, 05:21 PM
  2. Why is my boost gauge only reading vacuum and no boost?
    By gtp02 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-21-2010, 02:26 PM
  3. dic boost gauge only shows half boost
    By SilvaMan61 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-10-2010, 07:40 PM
  4. only 4 lbs boost???
    By orange97gtp in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-29-2009, 04:50 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •