Thread: Which would be better?

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 Which would be better? 
    SE Level Member 2001GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    102
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I currently have a 3.4 pulley now. I've had to drop my timing way back to get to 0* KR. Would i be better off going back to my 3.8 pulley and adding timing?Also, I'm having to run a little rich to help with the KR.
    3.6", 3" Downpipe, K&N CAI, 104's, PRJ Tune, P-Log, 180 t-stat,Res delete, wideband, boost gauge. 14.11" @ 99.5
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Which would be better? 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    bigger pulley and more timing would make the car faster. i dont know why you cant run that 3.4 with downpipe, plog, a wideband, and a tune USING the wideband.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Which would be better? 
    SE Level Member 2001GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    102
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I'm not sure either. I'm heading out to PRJ on tues to see what he can do for me with a tune. I'm getting a lot of KR without pulling my timing a lot. I'm sure there is just something I'm missing and I hope he can help me out. If not I'm gonna swap back to the 3.8
    3.6", 3" Downpipe, K&N CAI, 104's, PRJ Tune, P-Log, 180 t-stat,Res delete, wideband, boost gauge. 14.11" @ 99.5
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Which would be better? 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Sure it isn't false?
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Which would be better? 
    SE Level Member 2001GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    102
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    110 octane kills all kr.
    3.6", 3" Downpipe, K&N CAI, 104's, PRJ Tune, P-Log, 180 t-stat,Res delete, wideband, boost gauge. 14.11" @ 99.5
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Which would be better? 
    GXP Level Member BwolfGT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    2,403
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yeah but if you can afford to always have 110 octane gas in your DD that you don't need to be driving a grand prix
    1998 GP GT - Topswap - Ported M90 - N* - 4" FWI - Poly Mounts - 3" DP - 180 Tstat - Alt. Rewire - 3.29 gearing - Full Exhaust - Custom Tune
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Which would be better? 
    SE Level Member 2001GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    102
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I can't afford it! I put in a few gallons when empty to verify that it wasn't false KR.
    3.6", 3" Downpipe, K&N CAI, 104's, PRJ Tune, P-Log, 180 t-stat,Res delete, wideband, boost gauge. 14.11" @ 99.5
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Which would be better? 
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •