Thread: Any reason NOT to go twin

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34
  1. #1 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    GPF Mr. President nawarkk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    West Side Michigan
    Posts
    3,432
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    wtf is this thread?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Donating Users chrisb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bucyrus, OH
    Posts
    404
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    a thread you started?
    99 Grand Prix old build- CAI, Custom exhaust, HV3, Stage 2 TB, custom tune, ported heads intense s1x cam, headers.
    Nothing great Just a small T66 Turbo with a Hv3 On a stock tranny untill i finish the other one.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    GPF Mr. President nawarkk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    West Side Michigan
    Posts
    3,432
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    lol noo I didn't start this thread, I clicked on it from the New Posts button and it brought me to this screen:



    Which is why I posted, is this thread lol.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    GT Level Member kjclawson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Fort Myers, Florida
    Posts
    464
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    it says it was stated by "dagger"...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
     

  6. #6 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    462
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ha ha ha, yeah I started this thread. Thats weird. lol. Oh well my question was what are the reasons for not going twin charged when we already have a super charger?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
     

  8. #8 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    462
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bio248 View Post
    efficiency is a good reason not to.
    But doesn't the turbo pretty much take over when the supercharger has lost its low end grunt?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    How about for the same money just turbo it and go twice as fast?
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    462
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegtp91 View Post
    How about for the same money just turbo it and go twice as fast?
    well thats kind of what I'm asking, we already have a super charger on the car and I'm guessing the turbo kit doesn't require all that much modification to get it to work with the super charger so I'm just wondering why more people don't go twin charged?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Donating Users Ibwrong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    943
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dagger View Post
    well thats kind of what I'm asking, we already have a super charger on the car and I'm guessing the turbo kit doesn't require all that much modification to get it to work with the super charger so I'm just wondering why more people don't go twin charged?
    From the research Ive done its a tuning nightmare..and what blue was saying instead of having a tuning nightmare go with just a turbo and have more power than both.
    2000 GTP - Project
    2000 Mustang GT
    2006 Charger
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Donating Users blowfishRus6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    g.a.
    Posts
    4,266
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    once the turbo really starts to spin, the supercharger will just get in its way.

    with the stalls/torque converters avalable you are pretty much in high rpm every time you step down on it.
    white 04 comg G gtp. wizair, pacesetters, slp 1.8 rr
    its slow.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    462
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    alright answers my question lol. Thanks!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    SE Level Member BlackGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Posts
    147
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Twin-charge is the way to go on the street. For the track, turbo is probably better, although zzp built a twin-charge car that ran 9.9, so I think we can rule out the assumption that the supercharger is somehow creating a limit for the turbo.

    The biggest advantages to twin-charging is that the turbo can be sized much larger to create better top-end boosting while still maintaining plenty of low-end torque with zero lag. This is most advantageous on the street where you are driving in many different rpm ranges and want instant power. I really like the feeling of the instant power in every gear and speed. Swapping smaller pulleys on a twin-charge setup creates even more street power, but sacrifices the top-end limits because of the stack effect.

    Twin-charging will create more heat, as the boost still tends to "stack" even after the bypass is active. This stacking is what gets the boost up to full much faster, but the additional heat must be dealt with, which is why it is recommended to have a twin-intercooler setup installed.

    There are not very many twin-charge setups, so I don't know who started the rumor that it is difficult to tune. It is no more difficult, or even different, then tuning a larger turbo-only setup. Boost comes in earlier, so PE vs. TPS is adjusted to handle that, but other than that, it is basics.

    2000 Regal GS | Stattama Twin-Charge with Comp Turbo 6765 | 12.55 @ 110 15psi | Now running 20psi on E85!! |
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Banned - Busted For Scamming
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    32812
    Posts
    3,060
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I plan on twincharging. You can get holset turbos off the cummins 5.9 for cheap good used on ebay
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Pfft. Holset's are junk. Stick with Garret or Turbonetics.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
     

  18. #18 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Donating Users blowfishRus6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    g.a.
    Posts
    4,266
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    curious, with the stall in this video, would it not elminate the low end lag/spooling of the turbo?? keeping the rpms high at all times when your in it no matter what speed your at. would you still need to twin charge with a set up like this??

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4E2RU...eature=related
    white 04 comg G gtp. wizair, pacesetters, slp 1.8 rr
    its slow.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Banned - Busted For Scamming
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    32812
    Posts
    3,060
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Look, its like this:

    If you have a s/c already, twincharge. If not, just turbo.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Donating Users blowfishRus6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    g.a.
    Posts
    4,266
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    well a supercharger is pretty easy to obtain.....

    i was kinda looking to a little more pros and cons to the diffrent set ups.

    i really dont see how the supercharger would not get in the way of the turbo, but thats why im here, to learn.
    white 04 comg G gtp. wizair, pacesetters, slp 1.8 rr
    its slow.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Got fired for a stupid reason.
    By Brammer in forum The Rant Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-03-2009, 02:41 PM
  2. This is one reason people keep trying to do pullies first...
    By FuglyGTP in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 86
    Last Post: 03-16-2009, 02:17 PM
  3. The Reason That Your Transmission May Act Up After a Flush
    By njbrain in forum 1997-2007 4 speed Automatic (4T65E) (4T65E-HD)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-23-2008, 07:53 AM
  4. Twin Turbo GTP
    By LogicGTP in forum Introductions/Noob Questions
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-26-2008, 08:44 PM
  5. Main reason for Amp to cut Out
    By jacobmh27 in forum Audio, Security & Visual Electronics
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-18-2008, 09:57 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •