Thread: Any reason NOT to go twin

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 34 of 34
  1. #21 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Banned - Busted For Scamming
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    32812
    Posts
    3,060
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Why would it get in the way? That supercharger can easily outflow this motor if its not having to work to create boost.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Donating Users blowfishRus6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    g.a.
    Posts
    4,266
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    if you got a supercharger that is set up to spin and create 8 pounds of boost, then you got an 18psi turbo coming behind it, would it not choke up the turbo some??

    that and would an intercooler under the supercharger be enough for all the heat???
    white 04 comg G gtp. wizair, pacesetters, slp 1.8 rr
    its slow.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Banned - Busted For Scamming
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    32812
    Posts
    3,060
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You have to think of it in terms of cfm, not psi. Also, i will be running a full size phenolic core but i may plumb in a front mount as well havent decided.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    youtu.be/xhrBDcQq2DM FoSHO99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maquoketa, Iowa
    Posts
    2,943
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The only reason to go twin is when you are running a larger turbo. Most of the base turbo kits run turbos tailored to our platform, very little lag. Some of the larger turbos available have been pieced together using various parts from different manufacturers to reduce the amount of lag there is. The basic rule seems to be that if you have a T67 or above, twincharged will help. You have to decide if you want to mess with 2 intercooling systems, also at that level traction becomes a problem, will you really be able to put that power to the ground or is the turbo lag really a good solution to traction problems?
    2001 GTP PT61 Turbo, E85, Stock Motor
    2011 Chevy Cruze MT6 1.4L Turbo
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Banned - Busted For Scamming
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    32812
    Posts
    3,060
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I wouldnt give a ****. Busting loose at 60mph is always an option.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    SE Level Member BlackGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Posts
    147
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blowfishRus6 View Post
    would an intercooler under the supercharger be enough for all the heat???
    With only an intercooler under the supercharger, I was able to run 15psi and pull mid 12's in full street trim with a crappy 2.1 60'. (I really don't know what I'm doing at the track ). With dual W/A intercoolers (one for the turbo, and the other under the s/c), I have been able to run as much as 19psi (mix of race gas also), but I never got a chance to run full out at the track this year.

    Once you make enough power, launching on these cars is tough no matter what you have. That's why I think turbo only is better for the track, so you can ease into it, and not spin half way down the track.

    2000 Regal GS | Stattama Twin-Charge with Comp Turbo 6765 | 12.55 @ 110 15psi | Now running 20psi on E85!! |
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Donating Users blowfishRus6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    g.a.
    Posts
    4,266
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i see. good to know.

    think it will go 11's??
    white 04 comg G gtp. wizair, pacesetters, slp 1.8 rr
    its slow.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #28 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    SE Level Member BlackGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Posts
    147
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blowfishRus6 View Post
    i see. good to know.

    think it will go 11's??
    If I could drive, I'd already be in the 11's.

    I'm trying to see how far I can go on the stock cam and heads. I'd like to make at least one mid 11's run.

    There are not that many twin-charge setups that I have seen track times from, but I do know that one of the GP guys from Canada ran 11.5 @ 125 on a twin-charge setup with only a 62-1 turbo.

    2000 Regal GS | Stattama Twin-Charge with Comp Turbo 6765 | 12.55 @ 110 15psi | Now running 20psi on E85!! |
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #29 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    Donating Users blowfishRus6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    g.a.
    Posts
    4,266
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    sweet! good luck getting there, sounds like a pretty bad ass set up.


    you guys and your damn turbos
    white 04 comg G gtp. wizair, pacesetters, slp 1.8 rr
    its slow.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #30 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    ROLLS ARE FOR BAKERS... whiney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    swift current,sask.
    Posts
    1,469
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackGS View Post
    If I could drive, I'd already be in the 11's.

    I'm trying to see how far I can go on the stock cam and heads. I'd like to make at least one mid 11's run.

    There are not that many twin-charge setups that I have seen track times from, but I do know that one of the GP guys from Canada ran 11.5 @ 125 on a twin-charge setup with only a 62-1 turbo.
    Yes here is the thread on the western canada grand prix site.
    Western Canada Grand Prix Club - View topic - Twincharged Dyno
    2000 2dr. black GTP|Headers|3.1"|xp'ed|ported s/c|HPT & aem wb|3.29's built trans|19° timing|0°KR
    Turbo/heads /big cam build starts soon!!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #31 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    GTX Level Member JoelW98GTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Portsmouth, OH
    Posts
    578
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by whiney View Post
    Yes here is the thread on the western canada grand prix site.
    Western Canada Grand Prix Club - View topic - Twincharged Dyno
    damn, that thing woulda made like 550 on a dynojet. Nice!
    98 GTP - Autolite 104s, wires, 180* t-stat, fwi, catless dp and plog, glasspack res, Reptile tuned PCM, tinted tails.
    91 Toyota MR2 Turbo - 327RWHP 322RWTQ 11.48@122mph
    03 BMW 325i - tint. stock.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #32 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    462
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Damn 12's with a twin charge set up. I'm sold lol.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #33 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dagger View Post
    Damn 12's with a twin charge set up. I'm sold lol.
    you can run 12s on the m90 without much work if you know how to drive.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #34 Re: Any reason NOT to go twin 
    GT Level Member popeyenate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    san diego
    Posts
    488
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegtp91 View Post
    Pfft. Holset's are junk. Stick with Garret or Turbonetics.
    really? because they last forever, much cheaper than that garrett counterpart, and can push as much air, if not MORE than a comparable GT...
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Got fired for a stupid reason.
    By Brammer in forum The Rant Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-03-2009, 02:41 PM
  2. This is one reason people keep trying to do pullies first...
    By FuglyGTP in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 86
    Last Post: 03-16-2009, 02:17 PM
  3. The Reason That Your Transmission May Act Up After a Flush
    By njbrain in forum 1997-2007 4 speed Automatic (4T65E) (4T65E-HD)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-23-2008, 07:53 AM
  4. Twin Turbo GTP
    By LogicGTP in forum Introductions/Noob Questions
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-26-2008, 08:44 PM
  5. Main reason for Amp to cut Out
    By jacobmh27 in forum Audio, Security & Visual Electronics
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-18-2008, 09:57 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •