Thread: New Dyno Numbers

Not to mention it was spiking to 15-16psi on the 2.8 pulley. I bet it doesn't even have IS3 heads on it.

Originally Posted by BillBoost37

^^ Agreed

Nick look under the valve cover and do the math s1x +

PRJ did the heads, I had a machine shop check it all. The check the stock 2.25" catback for restriction.. yup, got plenty of restriction there.

Meanwhile..wanna chat about nearly blowing your engine up on the dyno over a temp sensor harness? 16* KR at 5000rpm... Heard you screamed pretty loudly.

Sorry for the crap in your thread OP, pm me if you'd like it all cleaned.

It must be nice to be able to just throw crap around and not have any consequences eh? If you knew anything about how the PCM works, if the temp sensor disconnects, the car dumps fuel... there was actually 0* of KR, what worried me for a split second was that it attempted to run 30* of timing. There was no screaming involved either.

BTW, the car in question put down over 50whp more than your godly engine that baselined 289whp (and did so on stock heads without an intercooler) and was running more boost on a 2.8 pulley than Dan's was on a 2.6 pulley... and he doesn't have the rollers or IS3 heads.

Both cars put down more power across the board, I can only suspect that the engine in question either wasn't as advertised, or was sold with broken parts.