Thread: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks...

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 97
  1. #61 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Who is this guy? SubwayGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,295
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I'm 90% city driving though.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #62 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Donating Users EHB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    843
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by J57ltr View Post
    So is the fuel mileage thing a 5 button DIC I hear about? I always just have to figure it by resetting my Trip odo when I fill up, then dividing from there, well since I got an app that keeps track I use that now.

    Jeff

    2000 GTP - 3" Catted DP...ZZP Plog...9" Cone filter...Reptile pcm...3.4 pulley...AL104's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #63 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Donating Users EHB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    843
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by HighOctaneRacing View Post
    City MPGs with hilly terrain swallows big time on a stock tune. Get a tune. It'll pay for itself

    Sent from my LG G3
    i drive mostly city and hilly terrain and i lost about 1.5 mpg when i installed an overkill pcm. i was getting just over 16 now i'm under 15.
    2000 GTP - 3" Catted DP...ZZP Plog...9" Cone filter...Reptile pcm...3.4 pulley...AL104's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #64 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by EHB View Post
    05' is different, no? Mine just has 3 buttons below a smaller display.

    Jeff
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #65 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Who is this guy? SubwayGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,295
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The display you see is for 6th generation GP's. 7th generations have a littler display that can either come with 3 or 5 buttons.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #66 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I get more than 250~ miles to a tank on E85 LOLOLOL.

    And anyone that uses the DIC as an accurate tool to calculate gas mileage needs to stop. It's off. Always has been. GM got better over the years but even my Cobalt was wacky, and it was brand new.

    Use some math, lazies. Miles driven/gallons. I mean, it is rocket science after all.

    I average about 240-260 in the GXP, and it's always getting about 15~ gallons on fill up after it gets around an eighth of a tank...not to mention that is with 3.69's. My '98 won't take more than 13~ gallons, ever. I think the most I've put in that thing is 12.8.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #67 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    i still get crappy local mpg, 14's as per the dic. but thats a lot of stop and go.

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #68 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GTP Level Member 99GT2dr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cibolo, TX
    Posts
    545
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I also get better than 250 miles/tank using E85, that's horrible for gas, lol. From what I understand, the dic uses the IFR to calculate mpg, and obviously gear ratio and what not that calculates speed. So if your IFR is off, or maybe larger wheels/tires that throws the speedo off a little, it would throw off the dic readings. On my G8, it's usually spot on, maybe .1-.2 off on the mpg, surprised the hell out of me. The regal is pretty close too, but I forget how close (never enough to make me go "wtf?"), I usually just punch the numbers in my fuelly and go by that.
    '11 Suburban LTZ
    '99 SSEi
    '99 GT
    '09 G8 GT
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #69 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Donating Users 16MustangVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sh1t hole Afghanistan Currently
    Posts
    5,418
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Read 1st page stopped skipped back to here........

    Tell you same thing I tell my wife...........


    STOP DRIVING IT UNDER 1/8 TANK! I seriously wish cars would just shut down on their own with any small loss of fuel pressure that would keep people from destroying pumps because they try max out the tank capacity...... No you don't need to get every last drop lol!

    Hell I don't let mine ever go below 1/4 not like you can just stop buying gas so why avoid it?
    How I treat my car: wreck,fix, repeat.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #70 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Who is this guy? SubwayGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,295
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 98bleedingaholevet View Post
    Read 1st page stopped skipped back to here........

    Tell you same thing I tell my wife...........


    STOP DRIVING IT UNDER 1/8 TANK! I seriously wish cars would just shut down on their own with any small loss of fuel pressure that would keep people from destroying pumps because they try max out the tank capacity...... No you don't need to get every last drop lol!

    Hell I don't let mine ever go below 1/4 not like you can just stop buying gas so why avoid it?
    Because I'm sure GM wasn't like "Let's make it so when you have 1/8 of a tank of gas, your fuel pump burns out." I will take my chances with it. All I was saying for this thread is that I've never been in a car other than mine where I can watch the gas needle go down when hitting the brakes hard.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #71 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Donating Users bandook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    1,781
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    27
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It really shouldn't fluctuate level that much. But my car does seem to register quicker than most cars I've had. I would assume there is a delay of some sort programmed into the pcm for the sender before it sends the level to your cluster. There has to be some delay otherwise every time you turned, hit a bump, whatever the needle would bounce around. It would register like a tractors gas cap with the float and gauge attached together.

    I seem to remember something in the tiny tuner tables regarding this.
    Top Swapped 01 Imp
    VS (very small?) cam, SD Headers, 2.8" pulley, 29°, ported everything, E85, AEM water/meth, Deka 60's, HPT tuned
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #72 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Well they are pretty much baffled and I have only had 2 pump failures in my entire driving career one was a S-10 that a friend complained for more than 3 years that his truck would lurch and had no power but every time I asked him if he changed the fuel filter he would say no and 3 months later he would ask the same question. When I used a timing loght to look at the spray pattern every time you revved it up it went from a cone to a dribble. I ended up with that truck and the filter was so clogged that when I blew into it, it was like filling a balloon and I was afraid that it was going to spit gas in my face. It actually had vapor form when I released it. That pump failed 2 weeks later. The other was on an SC and I was able to get it to the shop after pounding on the gas tank.

    How many pumps actually fail due to low fuel? I guarantee that the vast majority of pump failures are due to the brushes being worn out.

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #73 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bandook View Post
    It really shouldn't fluctuate level that much. But my car does seem to register quicker than most cars I've had. I would assume there is a delay of some sort programmed into the pcm for the sender before it sends the level to your cluster. There has to be some delay otherwise every time you turned, hit a bump, whatever the needle would bounce around. It would register like a tractors gas cap with the float and gauge attached together.

    I seem to remember something in the tiny tuner tables regarding this.
    Bandook,

    What about the tach? The one in the GP seems sooo slow compared to the tach in my Park Ave. When it has a gear change the tach drops almost instantly, but in the GP even after the shift it just slowly drops.

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #74 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Donating Users bandook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    1,781
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    27
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I was just discussing this in another thread a few days ago. I'm actually quite impressed with how fast the 3800 revs. Its not Ferrari fast, but it doesn't hang near as bad as other cars I've owned. I don't think there is much you can do about it though. Lighter rotating assembly maybe? Or try some Moli Lube. I just put a can in my car, its moly disulphide. Read some reviews that people claimed quicker revs and throttle response. Haven't noticed it yet though. But as with any additive, there is plenty of opinions on both sides. I was researching it for another project when I came across the additive. Can't see it being anything but good, Moly D is an amazing product, second only to Teflon in reducing friction I believe.
    Top Swapped 01 Imp
    VS (very small?) cam, SD Headers, 2.8" pulley, 29°, ported everything, E85, AEM water/meth, Deka 60's, HPT tuned
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #75 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Awesome Level Member chrsmi1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    824
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 01Grand PrixGT View Post
    Because I'm sure GM wasn't like "Let's make it so when you have 1/8 of a tank of gas, your fuel pump burns out." I will take my chances with it. All I was saying for this thread is that I've never been in a car other than mine where I can watch the gas needle go down when hitting the brakes hard.
    We have the opppsite problem. I can watch my gas needle go down when I hit on the gas......
    Comp G. E85, 2.8, Headers, Tune, Intake, S1X, 105# springs, 60 # injectors, 255 walbro,etc.

    *NEW* 2002 Camaro Z28- Lid, Headers, Catback

    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #76 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I am more referring to the gauge not keeping up with the engine. My 97 tach is quick to react but the 05' GP is lazy. Kinda like you were talking about the gas gauge.

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #77 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Donating Users bandook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    1,781
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    27
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    ^^^ lol. Yup, same problem. And because of my crappy hack job on my canister I can't let mine go below 1\4 tank or it dies when I come to a quick stop or turn while accelerating.
    Top Swapped 01 Imp
    VS (very small?) cam, SD Headers, 2.8" pulley, 29°, ported everything, E85, AEM water/meth, Deka 60's, HPT tuned
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #78 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    I live here. stealthee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    SWPA
    Posts
    8,782
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by J57ltr View Post
    I am more referring to the gauge not keeping up with the engine. My 97 tach is quick to react but the 05' GP is lazy. Kinda like you were talking about the gas gauge.

    Jeff
    That difference is most likely related to DBW.


    2011 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS - DD mode
    1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT - Many mods to come
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #79 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    GXP Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Tomball
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    So do you think there could be something to speed up the tach, like you were talking about the fuel gauge? I'm fine with the fuel gauge on my car, but the tach is just too lazy.

    Jeff
    An engine is an engine no matter the size.... I think Dr. Seuss said that... or maybe it was Big Weld....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #80 Re: GM should've put baffles in the gas tanks... 
    Who is this guy? SubwayGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,295
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by chrsmi1 View Post
    We have the opppsite problem. I can watch my gas needle go down when I hit on the gas......
    When I hit the gas, the gas needle will actual rise lol. It will rise 1 or 2 ticks and then drop back down.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Tanks silver 04 GT2 (lots of pics)
    By Grandprix202 in forum Members Rides
    Replies: 787
    Last Post: 11-02-2016, 11:46 PM
  2. tanks projector build
    By Grandprix202 in forum Visual/Body Modifications
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 06-28-2014, 08:20 PM
  3. Fuel Tanks
    By grandamle91 in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-22-2011, 02:12 PM
  4. how many gallons are our tanks?
    By k5greek in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 12-20-2010, 12:54 PM
  5. This one baffles me!
    By UR LOSN in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-18-2009, 04:15 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •