It's 2010, let's move on...........

[xDetroitMetalx]

It's a good source of information, for the most part. It's owned by a liberal couple, though, so some of the information is filtered through liberal minds. Just like anything else - it's good to know the source.

Anyone can edit any part of information at any time. How do you figure all of it is filtered through this "liberal couple"?

[SnowDrift]

Anyone can edit any part of information at any time. How do you figure all of it is filtered through this "liberal couple"?

I've read it on several conservative news sources and found it to be true. World Net Daily is only one that cited examples of their liberal bias. Here's another example in this link. Liberal Bias at Wikipedia? | NewsBusters.org

Perhaps Wales is divorced now, so maybe it's not owned by a couple. It looks like his partner, though, left the business because of the political and social agenda it was promoting (assuming what I read about him ON wikipedia is true)

I think this discussion has gotten a little off topic, though, from the original poster's comments. If someone wants to keep ranting about wikipedia, then there should be a new thread started for that specific purpose. Sorry for the hijack.

Respectfully,
SnowDrift

[matt5112]

I've read it on several conservative news sources and found it to be true. World Net Daily is only one that cited examples of their liberal bias. Here's another example in this link. Liberal Bias at Wikipedia? | NewsBusters.org

Perhaps Wales is divorced now, so maybe it's not owned by a couple. It looks like his partner, though, left the business because of the political and social agenda it was promoting (assuming what I read about him ON wikipedia is true)

I think this discussion has gotten a little off topic, though, from the original poster's comments. If someone wants to keep ranting about wikipedia, then there should be a new thread started for that specific purpose. Sorry for the hijack.

Respectfully,
SnowDrift

How is using their "enemies" information getting you a more truthful impressive of them when they sit on other sides of the fence?

Reading that is hilarious, the interviewer gives off the impression that wikipedia is ONLY for the US and should represent them, not other countries...

What people fail to understand is that the people who use and contribute to wikipedia will be the ones who control it.

If you had more conservative than liberal people controlling it, then it'd swing the other way and you wouldn't have a problem with it.

[SnowDrift]

If you had more conservative than liberal people controlling it, then it'd swing the other way and you wouldn't have a problem with it.

You're starting to catch on

[matt5112]

You're starting to catch on

Teach them how the internet works first then we can have a "fair" wikipedia.

YouTube - Ted's Internet Tubes

[SnowDrift]

Teach them how the internet works first then we can have a "fair" wikipedia.

YouTube - Ted's Internet Tubes

I wouldn't be the one for that, my friend. I'm not all that sure how this whole things work, myself