Some people are just really really stupid.

[Warhellride]

Battalion Fire Chief Steve Sapp says police confiscated the bong and took samples to determine whether it was used for drugs.

In their defense, the police can't just assume it was used for drugs without evidence (although I don't know if they can prosecute anyone even if it was used for drugs, since they can't prove who was smoking it).

Also, in our unfortunate sue-happy world, the article can't just defame the character of the upstanding college students by assuming they would smoke weed.

[GeddyLee]

In their defense, the police can't just assume it was used for drugs without evidence (although I don't know if they can prosecute anyone even if it was used for drugs, since they can't prove who was smoking it).

Also, in our unfortunate sue-happy world, the article can't just defame the character of the upstanding college students by assuming they would smoke weed.

I hear ya War, I use to be a Police Officer, so I know exactly what you speak of. YES they can not prosecute anyone for "using," but they can prosecute for having drug paraphilnia* in most cases. I just found it funny how they worded it. Any right thinking person would know what a BONG is used for it. And we almost ALL know its not for smoking loose leaf tabacco