Thread: Dyno Results

Page 7 of 15 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 295
  1. #121 Re: Dyno Results 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    oh you....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #122 Re: Dyno Results 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    Odd...when I put mine together it was like this:

    Heads cost me $700
    Brand new full S3 WBS IC with new meziere pump cost me $500
    Gen V cost me $300
    And those 1.8's I added onto the top of the cam with the added lift.. $30

    Total cost $1530 ...

    I still agree that the TVS looks like a better option if you want to stay with a blower. BTW...does it have some good blower whine?
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #123 Re: Dyno Results 
    Poppin 'em thangs mechguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,177
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Sweet ancient and useless words.
    Last edited by mechguy; 02-14-2012 at 01:20 PM. Reason: Referring to the WBS info posted above.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #124 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    $1200 + shipping for a Stage 2 WBS intercooler... $500 plus a lot of crack? Maybe.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #125 Re: Dyno Results 
    I live here. MoarkatsINmuhtrailer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,150
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    mmm crack <3
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #126 Re: Dyno Results 
    Poppin 'em thangs mechguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,177
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    My favorite characteristic about this swap is that he used brainpower to find a better power adder.

    As opposed to starting a thread: "What do I need for xxxWHP"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #127 Re: Dyno Results 
    I live here. MoarkatsINmuhtrailer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,150
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    im all for the innovation in this setup....while i agree with some, and less with others. it is wat it is. he did it, it works. great. the turbo under 350hp comment was alittle derivative but so be it.. its someones opinion. good job flake, im glad its working for ya.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #128 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mechguy View Post
    My favorite characteristic about this swap is that he used brainpower to find a better power adder.

    As opposed to starting a thread: "What do I need for xxxWHP"
    Thanks Mech... the biggest hurdle was getting over the "bigger is better" mentality that has been drilled into my brain across every car forum on the internet. Once logic kicked in, though... it was an easy choice.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #129 Re: Dyno Results 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    The prices you paid for the TVS etc weren't new retail prices either.

    IC stuff from Nate Herbst. Funny part is the post was pretty old and I took a chance and made an offer.
    2003 SSEI is the SN of the guy I got the 1.8 brand new HS rockers from.
    Fubar aka guy from Mass is the guy I got the heads from. Stage 3's ported by PRJ.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #130 Re: Dyno Results 
    GT Level Member RegalGS98s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    369
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BillBoost37 View Post
    Odd...when I put mine together it was like this: Heads cost me $700 Brand new full S3 WBS IC with new meziere pump cost me $500 Gen V cost me $300 And those 1.8's I added onto the top of the cam with the added lift.. $30 Total cost $1530 ... I still agree that the TVS looks like a better option if you want to stay with a blower. BTW...does it have some good blower whine?
    I want to know how you got 1.8's for $30 lol, unless that's a miss-type.
    SMGPFC #0330 - 3.25, Intercooled, Custom Tune, 1.84rr, LS6 Springs, roller timing chain, SLP Headers, Borla Exhaust, built Trans, B&M Trans Cooler, home cut poly uppers, gapless rings, N* TB, Ported heads.
    Soontocome: CAM?, Custom modified M112, home poured Poly Engine and Trans mounts
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #131 Re: Dyno Results 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    Lots of folks know that Intense sold the HS rockers as their own and there were some problems with at least one batch of the pedestals. I bought a set from Intense that was bad for $30. Sent them to HS to be fixed (free) and then traded those refurbed 1.9's to my buddy for his brand new set of HS 1.8's.

    My cost $30

    Before I picked up my Regal, I thought I may go turbo and it was when Intense had gone under new management and was moving between buildings. I made a deal to buy the rest of the rockers they had on hand. 7 Sets... I kept one set for myself and sold the rest to cover the cost of my set. I sold the needing to be refurbished at a cost of $70 per set shipped.


    FWIW I still have a zip lock bag full of extra pedestals...HIXC here was happy I did because one of his was missing.

    Call me an opportunist.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #132 Re: Dyno Results 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    How do you call a cam, headers, N*, 2.8 pullied motor just a cam-only motor, even "for short"?

    You say nothing of relevance changed between 299 on the gen v and 350 on the TVS, but you changed injectors and a fuel pump. If you were out flowing the injectors AND pump on the TVS, how were you not on the Gen v?

    What does your 350WHP Street Tune have for timing?

    Was E-60 used on both gen V and TVS dynos?

    Edit: How many PSI were you seeing on each S/C?
    Last edited by Explicit_Spade; 02-14-2012 at 02:53 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #133 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Explicit_Spade View Post
    How do you call a cam, headers, N*, 2.8 pullied motor just a cam-only motor, even "for short"?

    You say nothing of relevance changed between 299 on the gen v and 350 on the TVS, but you changed injectors and a fuel pump. If you were out flowing the injectors AND pump on the TVS, how were you not on the Gen v?

    What does your 350WHP Street Tune have for timing?

    Was E-60 used on both gen V and TVS dynos?
    All of the answers to these questions are in post #1.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #134 Re: Dyno Results 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    They are?

    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    So we're all set now... The TVS has been on 2 different dynos with multiple witnesses, here's a run down of past events in a nutshell.

    Mods:
    GenV w/ MPS
    N*/LQ4
    SSAC Headers, no cat
    Stock Grand Prix GT catback
    Cold air/Open cone intake
    XP cam with 105# springs
    DHP/wideband tuned by me
    I call it a cam-only L32 for short.

    This setup made 299whp STD. This number was highly contested as being a sandbag number... It's true I made more uncorrected power in the dead of winter, but the corrected numbers were right around that figure. I don't remember exactly but +/- 5hp. This number was attained with a spot on tune, AFR that was locked in and on point and timing was on the cusp of what it would handle. Bottom line is that it wasn't making any more power, period.

    Anyway I swapped the TVS in place of the GenV and immediately found out that I was going to need more fuel. So I upgraded to 42s. Those weren't enough so I did 60s with a racetronix pump. That setup made 350whp on a base street tune and 2.8 pulley, 3rd pull. I wasn't able to dial it in any better as I was off the dyno after 10 minutes.



    Once those numbers were released, it seemed like everyone had an issue with it. Either with those numbers, the dyno reading high, me lying about something or whatever. Bottom line is that the GenV did 299 and the TVS did 350 with nothing else of relevance changed.

    So now we come to today's results. The TVS setup remains the same (2.8 pulley) except for this run was open down pipe and I was using e60 (tested and confirmed) fuel. It's about 102 octane. Winterblend ethanol, what are you gonna do?
    Skip my first question, because its not as much a question of the build, more a question of character.

    As to the fuel injector/ pump situation, all you say is that you "immediately found out that I was going to need more fuel." This doesn't say if you were out of injector before hand, or what fuel you were running. If you did the TVS swap and the "E-60" swap at the same time, all this "TVS only" crap, isn't.

    I guess this leaves my timing question to be answered with "The cusp of what it could handle"...

    I like how straightforward you are with what you're trying to stand so strongly behind, and you wonder why no one believes you.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #135 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    All of your questions are answered. You just can't read apparently. You even quote the answer to a question that you pose in the same sentence.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #136 Re: Dyno Results 
    GXP Level Member Zef_66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,084
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zef_66 View Post
    Can you do a cost breakdown of it? Of those that you listed that the TVS wins, cost and reliability are the most important to me.
    Flake, Any thought of doing a writeup? You said at some point that you were doing all this to help other people out and give them another option. There is tons of information in your threads, but it gets lost in the BS. Any chance of doing a writeup of picture and the basics, but nix the BS, and make it widely available for people who don't feel like sifting through 10 threads on 3 different forums?
    2001 GSE
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #137 Re: Dyno Results 
    GPFs Sexy Ginger. SilvaMan61's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    3,619
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i for one am very excited about the cost/power ratio. and the muscle purist in me is loving the S/C getting us there.
    SMGPFC Member #9
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #138 Re: Dyno Results 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    *sigh*
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #139 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Explicit_Spade View Post
    How do you call a cam, headers, N*, 2.8 pullied motor just a cam-only motor, even "for short"? cam-only means the engine only has a cam... obviously everything else is clearly listed.

    You say nothing of relevance changed between 299 on the gen v and 350 on the TVS, but you changed injectors and a fuel pump. If you were out flowing the injectors AND pump on the TVS, how were you not on the Gen v? the injector and pump issues were irrelevant because the limiting factor was knock, not fuel. the TVS flows more air and boost before knock is a limiting factor, therefor fuel became an issue when more air was introduced.

    What does your 350WHP Street Tune have for timing? Something like 16 degrees.

    Was E-60 used on both gen V and TVS dynos? No. This is abundantly clear in every post. I've gone over exactly what each dyno run consisted of at least 68 times.

    Edit: How many PSI were you seeing on each S/C? 11-12psi on the GenV. 14-15psi on the TVS. 11-12psi on the TVS with open down pipe.
    Everything you just asked has been gone over COUNTLESS times.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #140 Re: Dyno Results 
    I live here. TLSheff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Durant, Oklahoma, United States
    Posts
    8,033
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BillBoost37 View Post
    If you will permit me, before this thread goes under and is locked... again. Ima thread jack for 1 second

    CM690 Computer Case... I have the same one mwuahahaha, love it lol

    Okay, continue the epic battle of P3N1S vs Wit.

    Quote Originally Posted by AmericanSoldier View Post
    ...not scanning/monitoring your motor is like bangin a hooker and you just HOPE your not infected.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 7 of 15 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. GTP Dyno Results!!!
    By OrangeL67 in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-17-2011, 11:25 PM
  2. ** Back from ZZP Trip - DYNO results **
    By Silver2kgtp in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-27-2011, 11:28 PM
  3. sexy results :)
    By BoostJunki3 in forum Visual/Body Modifications
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 05-12-2010, 08:48 PM
  4. results on the 07 ss
    By joe deleon in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-10-2009, 01:06 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •