No.. I'd need to see the scan, car and tuner in hand to know how things are looking.
See, it's like this, you can toss up a bunch of numbers while I'm sitting here at work and it's an ugly jumble. Most of us have ideas of what is reasonable for MAF readings in a few of the cells. We don't memorize them or study them that closely, because each car is different. So if you said..I did this first run and scanned a second run and here's the %'s that came up on the second run, we could make suggestions from there. But to post numbers w/o the rest of the data is meaningless to me.
It's like me saying to you... I have a house full of trash, get something to put it in. You don't know if I mean I have 1000 sq feet or 5000 sq feet, you don't know if I'm seriously a hoarder with only a path to walk around the house. There's simply no basis for us to look at your numbers and give you a thumbs up. More info, other parameters, go scan again. Don't be afraid unless your scan is telling you to be.
