Thread: Think Civics are **** ?

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 79
  1. #21 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    #Billsnamechangessuck MrPoopyButthole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    15,112
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You don't even need a turbo...Cosworth has built N/a four cylinder engines that have hit 400-500hp!

    Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.
    2004 Saab 9-5 Aero - WAHSAABI - Way too much power/Koni FSD & Hirsch Springs/Big Sways - DD/AutoX'r
    2007 Ford F-150 Lariat - 5.4L V8 - Bill secretly likes it
    2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport SE - Wifey Mobile
     

  2. #22 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    youtu.be/xhrBDcQq2DM FoSHO99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maquoketa, Iowa
    Posts
    2,943
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I love clean, built imports, but the problem is there's too many damn imports done wrong in this world to make up for the rest of them. So when people talk about crappy hondas, more often they are in the right. lol But there's few things better than having rediculous hp in a sub 2000lb fwd car. The only downfall to most of these 4 cylinders is the lack of torque. As shelby says, HP sells, Torque wins races. An example: I know of a grand prix that dynoed at 430whp but ran 11.3's in the 1/4 mile while weighing in at 1,500lbs more than the nicely built honda mentioned here that dynoed 466whp running 11.6-12s.
    2001 GTP PT61 Turbo, E85, Stock Motor
    2011 Chevy Cruze MT6 1.4L Turbo
     

  3. #23 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cleveland Heights, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    1,007
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I love builds, here is my friends out mentor, oh








    I dont know how much HP he has
    Last edited by LowRidinCrew; 03-15-2011 at 06:55 PM.
    1998 Pontiac Grand Prix GT
    1998 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP
    2008 Buick Lacrosse Super
     

  4. #24 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GT Level Member VictorSmalls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Tyrone, PA
    Posts
    397
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    LOL @ all the GP drivers **** talking Hondas like they drive Bentleys. Give credit where it is due. I always watch out for the Hondas in my neck of the woods. I worked out an LS1 Camaro last spring, after seeing that race a Civic hatch on slicks rolled up next to me and made me look silly.
    Retired
    Turbo'd
     

  5. #25 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GTP Level Member Javi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    OKC, Oklahoma
    Posts
    564
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    An import done right, H23 swap- 89 prelude:



     

  6. #26 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GrandPrix Junkie SeanGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Waterloo, Iowa
    Posts
    4,168
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    And it looks good too.
     

  7. #27 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    club of used to own a gp 99prixgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    4,643
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    honda's aren't my thing by any means but, props, that car is fast
    16' wrx sti- stock
    06 Spice Red GTO- m6/exhaust/tune/suspension/377whp-383tq-sold
    99 silvermist gp gt-g5/xp/IC/3.0mps-parted&sold
     

  8. #28 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    SE Level Member fst4dr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    54
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I just have to put this out there!

    someone mentioned a "4 banger" running 45 pounds of boost............ blah blah blah


    But now lets play the game of take all those same "power adders" and put the equivalent on a v8.

    I am not hating on this honda because to each his own and it does look like he put some work into it but there is still no replacement for displacement
    1998 4dr GTP Bright Red
    180* Stat/FWI/ZZP PCM/SD Headers/MPS 3.4/104's/6000k H.I.D/Tinted tails/Eibach's/GMPP STB/12'' Brake upgrade/18'' Ruff Black/Machined
     

  9. #29 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    So not banned. Slowpoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    The dark side of the Moon
    Posts
    2,961
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dpzelenak View Post
    nice car, to bad he had to dump a sh1t load of money into it just to get it to that point
    I'm willing to bet it was a lot less spent then you think.

    I love EG hatch builds, yeah it's still a civic, but it's a civic that would drag most of the GP's on this site down the track. And to some people that's more important then heated seats, and a hud.



    2004 Cobra
    2011 Mustang GT
    2013 F150 SCrew 5.0
     

  10. #30 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Ottawa ON, Canada
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SeanGTP View Post
    After all is said and done a built GP is still a GP.
    Just saying. Not a civic fan, but I'll appreciate anything built right.
    I 100% agree.
    He didnt stick on a can and a body kit and painted it. he left it clean and made it look true JDM and shes a quick car. "karen" i believe he named it.
    if i had to pick an import it would be a Subaru Imprezza WRX STi.
    but if i had the money i wouldnt really mind building a honda, its just theres alot of other cars id rather do instead.
    _______________________
    2002 Acura Rsx Type S - K20A2
     

  11. #31 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Ottawa ON, Canada
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BeastlyGroceryGetter View Post
    All that and one of his headlights is not working? nice car though im a fan of imports.
    Think he took it out. im not sure why tho.
    _______________________
    2002 Acura Rsx Type S - K20A2
     

  12. #32 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Ottawa ON, Canada
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkieTheBear View Post
    Its not bad, I know civic's can be done right and look good, and he was doing that right up until he put green wheels on it. I don't care for this oddball wheel color thing.

    Black/grey/charcoal/gold on white are the best combos.

    Its a JDM thing. he sold the rims anyways. but its not uncommon to see orange, yellow, red, green, purple, blue, gold , etc for rims.

    it makes ya stand out:P.
    he might go orange this season. i said NOOO... i wanna see a nice blue on there. like darker blue. or just traditional black, white, gold, maybe even red.
    Im not usually a fan of gray.
    _______________________
    2002 Acura Rsx Type S - K20A2
     

  13. #33 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Ottawa ON, Canada
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkieTheBear View Post
    You don't even need a turbo...Cosworth has built N/a four cylinder engines that have hit 400-500hp!
    Turbo is just a better idea. rarrreeely will u see a built honda, subaru, etc with no power adder.
    Build it solid, then turbo that **** :P
    plus who doesnt like BOOST!
    _______________________
    2002 Acura Rsx Type S - K20A2
     

  14. #34 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Ottawa ON, Canada
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FoSHO99 View Post
    I love clean, built imports, but the problem is there's too many damn imports done wrong in this world to make up for the rest of them. So when people talk about crappy hondas, more often they are in the right. lol But there's few things better than having rediculous hp in a sub 2000lb fwd car. The only downfall to most of these 4 cylinders is the lack of torque. As shelby says, HP sells, Torque wins races. An example: I know of a grand prix that dynoed at 430whp but ran 11.3's in the 1/4 mile while weighing in at 1,500lbs more than the nicely built honda mentioned here that dynoed 466whp running 11.6-12s.

    He toned down the HP, i left out another Dyno that he was only at about 400.
    so about 400hp running 11s.
    and wow they have madd torque. sit in one and then when ur head slams against the seat tell me otherwise. Even before he turbod his GSR, it was a nice car to cruise in. Think felt like a race car and it only was running a mid 14 second or so 1/4mile.
    _______________________
    2002 Acura Rsx Type S - K20A2
     

  15. #35 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    Donating Users 16MustangVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sh1t hole Afghanistan Currently
    Posts
    5,418
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Ive said for a long time id rock a 92-95 civic coupe with a k swap and 300 na hp @ like 9k rpm lets be honest done right it would be like a crotch rocket on 4 wheels. Done clean with oem body paint, no turbo to mess with no sc to mess with ect ect.
     

  16. #36 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Ottawa ON, Canada
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Javi View Post
    An import done right, H23 swap- 89 prelude:



    Rims are too big:P. for "JDM" Standards haha. but nice swap.
    For it to be JDM a small car should have like 16" rims lol:P rarely will u see 17s for true enthusiasts.

    For are cars, its a little different.
    _______________________
    2002 Acura Rsx Type S - K20A2
     

  17. #37 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Ottawa ON, Canada
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 02GrandPrixIraqVet View Post
    Ive said for a long time id rock a 92-95 civic coupe with a k swap and 300 na hp @ like 9k rpm lets be honest done right it would be like a crotch rocket on 4 wheels. Done clean with oem body paint, no turbo to mess with no sc to mess with ect ect.
    like this guy:P except its an EK not EG

    YouTube - Civic hatch k20 vs supra 400 whp!


    silly firebird LOL i love it. id buy a civic, build it, just to do that.
    _______________________
    2002 Acura Rsx Type S - K20A2
     

  18. #38 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by fst4dr View Post
    I just have to put this out there!

    someone mentioned a "4 banger" running 45 pounds of boost............ blah blah blah


    But now lets play the game of take all those same "power adders" and put the equivalent on a v8.

    I am not hating on this honda because to each his own and it does look like he put some work into it but there is still no replacement for displacement
    yes there is. it's called boost. you're welcome for the lesson.
     

  19. #39 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GXP Level Member JoRoW99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Grand Island, Nebraska
    Posts
    2,015
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    holy fvck do want. I <3 eg hatches. How much does that think weigh? under a ton almost?
    '01 GT - Top swapped. ported SC/Heads/TB, SD headers, open cone, HPTuners, 3.4 MPS, 60#'s, E85.______________________SMGPFC #99_______________________
     

  20. #40 Re: Think Civics are **** ? 
    GT Level Member Tommyp2010's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Poland, Ohio
    Posts
    449
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by fst4dr View Post
    I just have to put this out there!

    someone mentioned a "4 banger" running 45 pounds of boost............ blah blah blah


    But now lets play the game of take all those same "power adders" and put the equivalent on a v8.

    I am not hating on this honda because to each his own and it does look like he put some work into it but there is still no replacement for displacement
    Well thank you captain obvious. Most obvious statement ever. No **** a larger engine has a higher maximum potential. You have to consider the fact that v8 cars are also much more expensive from the factory. For example, take $35k, and buy a mustang gt, or whatever it costs. I'll take my $35k, assuming were paying sticker price for both cars, and buy a new cobalt ss (my car) costing $25k and use the extra $10k and put it into my car in mods. It will STOMP your stock v8. Point is, when money is no object, more displacement is better without a doubt. But dollar for dollar, a 4 cyl is a better deal, up until the point where you reach the maximum potential of the size of the engine.

    2006 Mitsubishi Evo IX MR
     

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •