This guy was saying he was educated and experienced enough to start making $80k/yr. in D.C. over a decade ago. We're talking 10-15 years experience, at least a master's degree in Information Systems. He knows dick about qualifications, or the Airforce glossed over his resumé when they hired him and he should be getting paid a ****-ton more. Assuming he was not as remotely as qualified as he thought he was, he was unemployable in the field anywhere BUT the military. He'd have probably be making minimum wage in tier 1 support ("help desk"). That's about $10k/yr. before tax. (remember, it's $5.15/hr in 2000) So, even at his listed annual income of $13,413, he's still coming out on top at $7/hr. - more than he would likely get in the private sector without proper education/certs.
He was A1C at E-3 pay grade and not being shot at much in Ogden, Utah. For those wondering, an E-3 would be starting now at over $20k/yr.
Additionally, I would like to point out that this "letter" is somewhat shorter than the original and been poorly edited to "modernize" it. (Ex: "Saudi" has been changed to "AFGHANISTAN")
Also, Cindy Williams was a senior research fellow at MIT when she wrote the article in 2000 and held the position of Assistant Director for National Security in the Congressional Budget Office from '94-'97 under Clinton, not Obama.
For those still confused at this point, this is a decade-old issue that has been resolved ten years ago by not being passed. Let it die.
Original Article
Your chainletter can go **** itself. I hate these.