*cia fixed that for you
|
*cia fixed that for you
got a little more progress on the lower intake manifold:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
going to try a 2.7" pulley because I think the 2.6 heat's up the air too much or the blower is maxed out. I thought about a bigger throttle body but decided not to make a decision on it since there is a chance a gen v will get installed
I noticed that I had not posted my personal best 1/8th mile time, 9.77. not sure if I still have the time slip. I did switch back to regular gas, and on Saturday I am planning on making a run to Rock Springs to buy some E85, so will be switching back to E85 again.
yech here was a joke, pretty much handed them filled out paper work, then they wrote my number on the back window, and the guy said have fun.
never popped the hood even, guy did notice i had a intercooler of some sort tho.
Conversion factor for Denver (similar elevation) is 0.9405. That makes your 9.77 a 9.19. That 9.19 converts to about a 14.3...
NHRA has Denvers track at 5800 ft. The conversion factor isn't that much different. 6800 foot conversion would be about .929. Your 9.77 is still a 9.08 which is still a 14.20. Elevation doesn't make as big a difference as you think and it actually makes less of a difference on boosted cars.
As far as times go the time you record at the track you are at is the time you get. Governing bodies don't factor in altitude and such things. A guy in the 3000GT/Stealth game ran an 8.74 in the 1/4 in Albuquerque. He didn't go around trying to say it would have been faster than that at sea level. It would have been an 8.26 based on conversion factors..
it seems like the car should be faster than it is. the car has an xp cam with E85 and methanol injection running a 2.6 pulley and no kr. I'm not sure what it should run at the track.
some pictures of my walbro install
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6K...ew?usp=sharing
Clicking on picture links.... no likey.
Especially here at work where sites like Google Drive....DropBox.... all stuff is Verboten!
Google drive has to allow you to fully embed the actual photo...no?
Too much meth.
You're probably washing it out.
Sounds much slower than it should be.
I ran an 8.1 at sea level in the 1/8th with an XP, 3.4", and pump gas.
pump had to have been holding me back. loaded an adjustment to the tune, have the 2.6 pulley and 21 degrees of timing, car pulls hard now. at 80% throttle with the new pump the car runs better than at 100% throttle on the old pump. AFR was rich, like 10ish. I have a new tune ready to load with the maf sensor adjusted so it won't be as rich next time.
Last edited by SgtMarshal; 09-21-2017 at 08:44 PM.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |