taking bets on him not having it low enough to tuck tire.
|
Nice looking stang. I've always wanted one of the new 5.0's. Someday, someday..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
and thats where I prove you wrong...
Pics do NOT do the car justice. My buddy took a rolling video of it i'll get uploaded soon. front tire is tucked. 1/4" from tire to the inside of the fender. Flush, not much camber. Rears could use maybe a 1/4" more drop, but i like how it looks with a little rake to it. So yes, I did tuck tire. Carry on.
Rub a dub dub, skipper mcgee
son of a *****.
i could agree that the rear needs another 1/4-1/2" lower, but the front on my car needs the same thing so who am i to complain.
looks good. it'll be interesting to see what you do in the spring when it comes to wheels. the stock ones on it right now are killing the stance, but who puts wheels on right before winter?
Rake will lead to more scraping up front. That's why I lowered the rear more to give me more front clearance.
Your burn SUCKS.
Lame joke was lame.
Still not low![]()
Missouri roads are worse?
Bet![]()
Drove it 50 miles last night. No rubbing. Scrapped once on a real big dip in the road i didn't see coming, but not bad at all. only scraped a lower flap thing on the underside of the car.
Dang that thing is sllaaammmmmmmeeeddd. Why so low and not just stock ride height? I hear these cars have excellent suspension from the factory... I'm glad it works for you, personally I think the stock height looks much better.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Tags for this Thread |