Thread: Glasspack decrease power?

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1 Glasspack decrease power? 
    GT Level Member K Kraziee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I've been doing a little research on glasspacks and stumbled upon a forum that said glasspacks actually decrease horsepower. I don't know if that's true, just doesn't make sense to me. My resonator is rusting and I need either a new one or glasspack rather than goin straight pipe.
    DD: 2000 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP

    3.5 ZZP MPS, HAI, ZZP Ported Throttle Body, PLOG, 3" Catless DP, Water pump and Alt. UD Pulley, Custom Tune
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
     

  3. #3 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    I live here. stealthee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    SWPA
    Posts
    8,782
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Look at a glasspack, its straight through.

    As Bio said, if someone lost power adding a glass pack then they did it wrong. They might have been referring to the myth of backpressure.


    2011 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS - DD mode
    1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT - Many mods to come
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    SE Level Member Thinksun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    GTP Ontario
    Posts
    45
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    My car has a straight pipe replacing stock resonator, I dont notice any drone sound that I was expecting.

    Funny on glass packs though, on a truck I had-I noticed power and fuel economy had improved when stock muffler rotted out. I had a single glass pack installed thinking I would keep improvement with a bit of sound. The opposite, the truck couldn't get out of ts own way. I drove 2 miles and returned to muffler shop and they replaced glasspack with a section of straight pipe. The result was I could light the tires with ease and it stayed this way till I sold it a couple years later. Made no sense to me but it worked.
    1997 GTP .
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It's possible though highly unlikely that you put the glass pack on backwards creating a turbulence similar to having a bad cat. That takes some real skill though.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    GT Level Member K Kraziee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Good info. I might try a straight pipe and see where that get's me. If the sound is too much, I'll try a glasspack.
    DD: 2000 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP

    3.5 ZZP MPS, HAI, ZZP Ported Throttle Body, PLOG, 3" Catless DP, Water pump and Alt. UD Pulley, Custom Tune
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    GT Level Member K Kraziee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    If I did go with a glasspack, should I get a 2.25 or 2.5"? Ik the backpressure talk is a myth but I keep reading many different theory's when searching. Thanks again for the help.
    DD: 2000 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP

    3.5 ZZP MPS, HAI, ZZP Ported Throttle Body, PLOG, 3" Catless DP, Water pump and Alt. UD Pulley, Custom Tune
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Backpressure: The myth and why it's wrong.

    I. Introduction

    One of the most misunderstood concepts in exhaust theory is backpressure. People love to talk about backpressure on message boards with no real understanding of what it is and what it's consequences are. I'm sure many of you have heard or read the phrase "Hondas need backpressure" when discussing exhaust upgrades. That phrase is in fact completely inaccurate and a wholly misguided notion.

    II. Some basic exhaust theory

    Your exhaust system is designed to evacuate gases from the combustion chamber quickly and efficently. Exhaust gases are not produced in a smooth stream; exhaust gases originate in pulses. A 4 cylinder motor will have 4 distinct pulses per complete engine cycle, a 6 cylinder has 6 pules and so on. The more pulses that are produced, the more continuous the exhaust flow. Backpressure can be loosely defined as the resistance to positive flow - in this case, the resistance to positive flow of the exhaust stream.

    III. Backpressure and velocity

    Some people operate under the misguided notion that wider pipes are more effective at clearing the combustion chamber than narrower pipes. It's not hard to see how this misconception is appealing - wider pipes have the capability to flow more than narrower pipes. So if they have the ability to flow more, why isn't "wider is better" a good rule of thumb for exhaust upgrading? In a word - VELOCITY. I'm sure that all of you have at one time used a garden hose w/o a spray nozzle on it. If you let the water just run unrestricted out of the house it flows at a rather slow rate. However, if you take your finger and cover part of the opening, the water will flow out at a much much faster rate.

    The astute exhaust designer knows that you must balance flow capacity with velocity. You want the exhaust gases to exit the chamber and speed along at the highest velocity possible - you want a FAST exhaust stream. If you have two exhaust pulses of equal volume, one in a 2" pipe and one in a 3" pipe, the pulse in the 2" pipe will be traveling considerably FASTER than the pulse in the 3" pipe. While it is true that the narrower the pipe, the higher the velocity of the exiting gases, you want make sure the pipe is wide enough so that there is as little backpressure as possible while maintaining suitable exhaust gas velocity. Backpressure in it's most extreme form can lead to reversion of the exhaust stream - that is to say the exhaust flows backwards, which is not good. The trick is to have a pipe that that is as narrow as possible while having as close to zero backpressure as possible at the RPM range you want your power band to be located at. Exhaust pipe diameters are best suited to a particular RPM range. A smaller pipe diameter will produce higher exhaust velocities at a lower RPM but create unacceptably high amounts of backpressure at high rpm. Thus if your powerband is located 2-3000 RPM you'd want a narrower pipe than if your powerband is located at 8-9000RPM.

    Many engineers try to work around the RPM specific nature of pipe diameters by using setups that are capable of creating a similar effect as a change in pipe diameter on the fly. The most advanced is Ferrari's which consists of two exhaust paths after the header - at low RPM only one path is open to maintain exhaust velocity, but as RPM climbs and exhaust volume increases, the second path is opened to curb backpressure - since there is greater exhaust volume there is no loss in flow velocity. BMW and Nissan use a simpler and less effective method - there is a single exhaust path to the muffler; the muffler has two paths; one path is closed at low RPM but both are open at high RPM.

    IV. So how did this myth come to be?

    I often wonder how the myth "Hondas need backpressure" came to be. Mostly I believe it is a misunderstanding of what is going on with the exhaust stream as pipe diameters change. For instance, someone with a civic decides he's going to uprade his exhaust with a 3" diameter piping. Once it's installed the owner notices that he seems to have lost a good bit of power throughout the powerband. He makes the connections in the following manner: "My wider exhaust eliminated all backpressure but I lost power, therefore the motor must need some backpressure in order to make power." What he did not realize is that he killed off all his flow velocity by using such a ridiculously wide pipe. It would have been possible for him to achieve close to zero backpressure with a much narrower pipe - in that way he would not have lost all his flow velocity.

    V. So why is exhaust velocity so important?

    The faster an exhaust pulse moves, the better it can scavenge out all of the spent gasses during valve overlap. The guiding principles of exhaust pulse scavenging are a bit beyond the scope of this doc but the general idea is a fast moving pulse creates a low pressure area behind it. This low pressure area acts as a vacuum and draws along the air behind it. A similar example would be a vehicle traveling at a high rate of speed on a dusty road. There is a low pressure area immediately behind the moving vehicle - dust particles get sucked into this low pressure area causing it to collect on the back of the vehicle. This effect is most noticeable on vans and hatchbacks which tend to create large trailing low pressure areas - giving rise to the numerous "wash me please" messages written in the thickly collected dust on the rear door(s).
    Yup, myth.

    If it's catted, it could be a clogged cat...or some other issue like stated. Collapsed mufflers, don't know.

    With a catless 3" DP, a long glasspack (26+ inches), get someone to build you a 2.5"~ catback and put whatever mufflers you want on it...that should solve the case if anything is in there or not plugging it up. And yes, you'll want a 2.5" glasspack...you can always have a step down welded in there going from the 3".
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    GTX Level Member QUICKSILVER462's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    HUDSON
    Posts
    1,132
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    8
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Normally, mufflers including glasspacks have and inlet, and an outlet, to indicate the direction of the flowing exhaust gasses. If the muffler were to be installed incorrectly, (reversed direction), it could indeed seriously hinder the exhaust gasses and cause a noticeable lack in engine performance.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    186
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i run a glass pack on my turbo car the turbo spools slightly faster with it off but power feels about the same
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by QUICKSILVER462 View Post
    Normally, mufflers including glasspacks have and inlet, and an outlet, to indicate the direction of the flowing exhaust gasses. If the muffler were to be installed incorrectly, (reversed direction), it could indeed seriously hinder the exhaust gasses and cause a noticeable lack in engine performance.
    As much as I agree on basically everything...if you look at the design or the basic flow characteristics of a glasspack...I doubt installing it backwards would hinder pretty much nothing.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It changes the direction of the baffles, creating a different sound.

    As far as gains or losses, I have no factual data.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    GT Level Member K Kraziee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    313
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Would there be indications like arrows or something on the glasspack to tell you which way is which? If not, maybe it's not a big deal? I will probably take it in to get welded so I hope they do it right if theres no indications.
    DD: 2000 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP

    3.5 ZZP MPS, HAI, ZZP Ported Throttle Body, PLOG, 3" Catless DP, Water pump and Alt. UD Pulley, Custom Tune
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    186
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blueguy View Post
    As much as I agree on basically everything...if you look at the design or the basic flow characteristics of a glasspack...I doubt installing it backwards would hinder pretty much nothing.
    depending on what type of baffels or scoops are inside to direct the exhasut into the packing, putting it on backwards looks like it would increase flow on some, i run mine backwards since the scoops were pretty large i didnt want to slow down the exhaust that much
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Glasspack decrease power? 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    There aren't any arrows because, like I said...it probably doesn't make a sh1ts lick of difference.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Glasspack?
    By Pure2sin in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-12-2012, 11:44 PM
  2. Glasspack?
    By NomeCrusher in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-28-2010, 10:51 PM
  3. Help With Glasspack
    By Pontiac Warrior in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-13-2010, 07:28 PM
  4. Will a removed cat or bad o2 sensor decrease low end torque
    By FlaminWhite97GTP in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-02-2009, 09:44 PM
  5. Engine Smoking and MPG decrease
    By GreenNirvana101 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-25-2008, 07:32 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •