Thread: Dyno Results

Page 11 of 15 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 220 of 295
  1. #201  
    GT Level Member boothe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Troy, Mo
    Posts
    180
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    All this thread did is lower my braincells haha i love these arguments there entertaining

    Sent from my Motorola Electrify using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #202 Re: Dyno Results 
    Mullet Member Wotgtp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    1,163
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by boothe View Post
    All this thread did is lower my braincells haha i love these arguments there entertaining
    We can tell.
    - Ed - 2000 Grand Poverty Daytona edition. Rough idle. Funny whistle. Steering issues at WOT. 3.8 SC pulley.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #203 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    p2s will still not tell me what my car made corrected.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #204 Re: Dyno Results 
    GXP Level Member darkhorizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    flintnasty MI
    Posts
    2,596
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    8% horsepower gain for $1850+ install parts.

    Sounds like a killer deal.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #205 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Your math skills are phenomenal... are you sure you don't drive railroad spikes for a living?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #206 Re: Dyno Results 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Slow/Snow you really make me regret dropping over $1000 on an IC for maybe 40hp. I am jealous.
    Slowest 'Cooled Gen V ever

    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #207 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Dont regret it... just throw a TVS on top of it!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #208 Re: Dyno Results 
    GrandPrix Junkie dpzelenak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
    Posts
    4,169
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    HI Everyone!





    just wanted to say hi before i wake up in the morning and this thread is locked

    SMGPFC Member #10
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #209 Re: Dyno Results 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Explicit_Spade View Post
    How do you call a cam, headers, N*, 2.8 pullied motor just a cam-only motor, even "for short"?

    You say nothing of relevance changed between 299 on the gen v and 350 on the TVS, but you changed injectors and a fuel pump. If you were out flowing the injectors AND pump on the TVS, how were you not on the Gen v?

    What does your 350WHP Street Tune have for timing?

    Was E-60 used on both gen V and TVS dynos?

    Edit: How many PSI were you seeing on each S/C?
    Bumping my unanswered questions.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #210 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Explicit_Spade View Post
    Bumping my unanswered questions.
    You have gotta be kidding me.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #211 Re: Dyno Results 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Nope. Maybe if you had hard facts to stand behind you would have answered my questions by now. You wanna sit here and say that your TVS is so incredible, but you have no facts to put behind it.

    You not only added a twin screw blower, but you also swapped to "e-60", bigger injectors, a better pump. Who is to say that your factory injectors or factory pump weren't the issues in the first place?

    If you want to make a supercharger comparison, make a fair comparison with factual evidence instead of this half-assed "I think I'm better than you" bull**** that is spewed throughout this thread.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #212 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Explicit_Spade View Post
    Nope. Maybe if you had hard facts to stand behind you would have answered my questions by now. You wanna sit here and say that your TVS is so incredible, but you have no facts to put behind it.

    You not only added a twin screw blower, but you also swapped to "e-60", bigger injectors, a better pump. Who is to say that your factory injectors or factory pump weren't the issues in the first place?

    If you want to make a supercharger comparison, make a fair comparison with factual evidence instead of this half-assed "I think I'm better than you" bull**** that is spewed throughout this thread.
    The amount of fail in this post is epic.
    Why don't you go look at post #140, and then check to see what kind of blower a TVS is.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #213 Re: Dyno Results 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It doesn't compare to the amount of fail in the first post.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #214 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Explicit_Spade View Post
    It doesn't compare to the amount of fail in the first post.
    All I see in the first post is WIN
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #215 Re: Dyno Results 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    That's because you don't see reality.

    I'm going to back out of this thread, since you won't answer my questions and have no hard facts anyway. When you grow up and decide to stop writing these fictional stories, let me know.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #216 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Explicit_Spade View Post
    That's because you don't see reality.

    I'm going to back out of this thread, since you won't answer my questions and have no hard facts anyway. When you grow up and decide to stop writing these fictional stories, let me know.
    You're so stupid that I am at a loss for words. How can you effectively comprehend the overwhelming proof if you can't even read?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #217 Re: Dyno Results 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Mkay, looks like I'll stick around this thread and play till it's locked since that's clearly what you want.

    Look at the questions I want answered, then go copy and paste a quote of what you said in the first thread and Change the color to red where the answers are.

    You won't because the answers aren't there. Don't tell me I can't read when there's nothing to be read.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #218 Re: Dyno Results 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowFlake View Post
    The amount of fail in this post is epic.
    Why don't you go look at post #140, and then check to see what kind of blower a TVS is.

    Quote Originally Posted by Explicit_Spade View Post
    How do you call a cam, headers, N*, 2.8 pullied motor just a cam-only motor, even "for short"? cam-only means the engine only has a cam... obviously everything else is clearly listed.

    You say nothing of relevance changed between 299 on the gen v and 350 on the TVS, but you changed injectors and a fuel pump. If you were out flowing the injectors AND pump on the TVS, how were you not on the Gen v? the injector and pump issues were irrelevant because the limiting factor was knock, not fuel. the TVS flows more air and boost before knock is a limiting factor, therefor fuel became an issue when more air was introduced.

    What does your 350WHP Street Tune have for timing? Something like 16 degrees.

    Was E-60 used on both gen V and TVS dynos? No. This is abundantly clear in every post. I've gone over exactly what each dyno run consisted of at least 68 times.

    Edit: How many PSI were you seeing on each S/C? 11-12psi on the GenV. 14-15psi on the TVS. 11-12psi on the TVS with open down pipe.
    Everything you just asked has been gone over COUNTLESS times.
    POST 140 IN THIS THREAD

    My god, is there anyone with a brain????

    Quote Originally Posted by Explicit_Spade View Post
    Mkay, looks like I'll stick around this thread and play till it's locked since that's clearly what you want.

    Look at the questions I want answered, then go copy and paste a quote of what you said in the first thread and Change the color to red where the answers are.

    You won't because the answers aren't there. Don't tell me I can't read when there's nothing to be read.
    You fail SO HARD that I would SERIOUSLY consider seeing a doctor. We're at the point where it's not even funny or amusing anymore... its ****ing disturbing.

    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #219 Re: Dyno Results 
    Perma-Banned! JK LOL Explicit_Spade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    7,921
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You said all this was in post 1 NUMEROUS times, did you not? I wasn't about to read through 10 pages of bull**** for it.

    Clearly the gains are from the E-60, injectors and pump with more boost. Just as effectively you could have put on a 2.6 with fueling changes on the Gen V and saved yourself 2 grand.
    Quote Originally Posted by W-Body Store
    Remember, GM engineers didn't take into account your need for speed.
    Daily Driver: 06 Grand Prix GT / 9.4:1 CR / IS3 Heads / Ported Gen V / ZZP Headers / HPT Pro / Pulleys: 4.25, 3.8, 3.5, 3.4, 3.2, 3.0, 2.9, 2.7
    Projects: 86 Monte Carlo SS / 98 Sonoma / 74 Honda CB750
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #220 Re: Dyno Results 
     

Page 11 of 15 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. GTP Dyno Results!!!
    By OrangeL67 in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-17-2011, 11:25 PM
  2. ** Back from ZZP Trip - DYNO results **
    By Silver2kgtp in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-27-2011, 11:28 PM
  3. sexy results :)
    By BoostJunki3 in forum Visual/Body Modifications
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 05-12-2010, 08:48 PM
  4. results on the 07 ss
    By joe deleon in forum Track Sessions and Kills
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-10-2009, 01:06 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •