Thread: 2.93 vs 3.29

Results 1 to 20 of 23

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 Re: 2.93 vs 3.29 
    blueguy
    blueguy is offline
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Default 05-16-2011
    Quote Originally Posted by JoRoW99 View Post
    3.29s are better for everything except gas mileage and top speed
    Care to elaborate?

    I've been down this road before with you saying this in another thread. 2.93's are better for turbo cars to help with traction...that's it. I constantly get better MPG's now than I did with my 2.93's. 3.29's are awesome.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     
  2. #2 Re: 2.93 vs 3.29 
    SnowFlake
    SnowFlake is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,730
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Default 05-16-2011
    Tires and suspension help traction... going up in gear shouldn't be on the table to deal with traction issues.
    Reply With Quote  
     
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Tags for this Thread
293, 329

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules