Hmmm....I would have thought you'd have made more than that. Did the air suck? Maybe the dyno wasn't calibrated properly.
Printable View
Hmmm....I would have thought you'd have made more than that. Did the air suck? Maybe the dyno wasn't calibrated properly.
Idk ha
Ya I wouldn't know either.
Shouldnt your timing have been a bit higher? That timing number sounds kinda low.
It could probably be advanced some...but, 18* isn't bad at all for keeping it safe. 19* is about all I'd push it for a daily driven car.
I was always told 20* is where you start putting the Head Gaskets at risk.. Just thought i had heard of people pushing 18* on pump gas with a similar build...
I ws at 20 but i turned it down to be safe. Ill get the ic and 2.8 on, bring it to a local dyno and tune it and get some real numbers.
and bring it back up to 20
Cammed L67 making less than 300whp= something is wrong.
FixedQuote:
Originally Posted by txslow6
hmm that makes me sad, Im on a 2.8 now retuned feels a hell of a lot faster now
Im not a big believer in giant timing tables.... General boost tuning states that the more boost / compression you run the less timing is nessary to reach peak combustion right at top dead center because the fuel and air is squished much closer together. When I had mine on the dyno (Keep in mind this is a l36 block so its high compression) I was running a 3.4 inch pulley on gas at the time and was running 20* of timing with no kr. Just for fun we added timing and saw no gains at all. In fact we pulled timing all the way down to 13* before we saw any power or torque loss. I still run 14* now and notice 0 change when I run any more..... heck iv tuned subarus and the same story there.... running almost 25psi of boost you only need 14 to 15* to make peak power.
Out of curiosity go you happen yo have any Dyno sheets from these pulls? I would be very interested to see them.
yeah, they are in the car. Let me go grab them and get them online. Hold on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman6669
http://i.imgur.com/WmndMT1.jpg
My shift point was set @ 6250 just for reference.
Were all three of those with the same timing? What was the timing?
18* I think. I would have to check the tuning laptop to be sure
I guess what I was really wanting to see was something showing that with lower timing it didnt hurt the HP output...
Oh he doesn't have sheets for that I don't think. Have to ask frosty
Never bothered with sheets back when I was playing with that. Was mostly on the dyno to find what afr and timing the car was most happy at so I would know what to tune for. Butt dyno and the 1/4mile dyno both say that I go faster on 14* and a smaller pully (Less timing = I can run more boost) then with 18* and .2 bigger pulley.