Thread: GTP stock camber

I was looking at my ca.r and I noticed the back tires had a slight tance. Is this normal? Just never noticed it before until now

yup, especially if the suspension is older.

anywhere from just under 1* to around 1.5* is typical for a 'stock' alignment. the rear will have noticeably more camber than the front at all times.

Originally Posted by Bio248

yup, especially if the suspension is older.

anywhere from just under 1* to around 1.5* is typical for a 'stock' alignment. the rear will have noticeably more camber than the front at all times.

It's 15 years old lol. I was with my sister backing out of her driveway and I was like "What the **** is that?!" I guess I just never noticed it which is odd because I'm very observant. Thanks though

Originally Posted by Speedy1973

Is it bad like mine?
IMG-20130531-00097_zps54de7368.jpg

Just about!

Here are specs for our cars.

What if mine looks kind of like speedy's?

Then pull back the carpet in the trunk and look at the strut towers, if they are rusting away thats part of the issue.

Otherwise if thats not the issue, then you need new rear struts and an alignment.

my rear camber is pretty negative. However i got lows......

Originally Posted by Fivefingerdeathpunch

Then pull back the carpet in the trunk and look at the strut towers, if they are rusting away thats part of the issue.

Otherwise if thats not the issue, then you need new rear struts and an alignment.

Hoping for the second problem you said.

F***. Rusted pretty f***ing good. I can tell that's the problem too because the driver's side rear camber is worse than the passenger side rear. The driver's side is very rusty...