well i found something that was a bit different lol check this link out
|
When I did my XP cam like 6 months ago, ZZP said 105s were the way to go. I'd like to see this post you're talking about. Also those gains seem insanely high considering the gains from an XP in general are supposively 30-50WHP, and all you did was switch to inferior retainers and better springs? Granted you're not comparing the 105s to the 130s there but it seems like there had to be another issue there.
Go for it. Steve is a good guy.
I know I've got an email from PRJ regarding it as well, but I can't find it either. Evidently I suck at the internet today.
Response from Steve at ZZP:
"brand new 105's are fine with an XP. i have seen some cars pick up power going to 130's (i just did some on my car) they dont float BAD necessarily, but some cars will float some as the 105's wear out. usually it is a huge power drop, and boost climb at the top of the dyno chart.....the reason we dont put 130's in more cars, is because they are hard on a timing chain that already sucks to begin with."
So it seems like basically 105s are good for awhile and then could possibly lead to such situations as you observed.
Seems like you either pick replacing springs more often or replacing chains more often... Asuming he is refering to the double set as well on the 130s.
I put new springs on my white car when I did the cam, and took everything back out after ~8k miles. I know that boost used to increase at upper rpms, but I don't know for sure if that happened right away when I did the install - Can't remember anymore.
The LS6's on my 01 were bad though...boost would always increase 2-3psi at upper rpms. Now with the 130's, boost stays the same across the entire rpm range.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Tags for this Thread |