Thread: Supercharger vs turbo

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26
  1. #1 Supercharger vs turbo 
    GTP Level Member Dee23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    North Philly
    Posts
    908
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Now we all know turbos make more power on these 3800s than the M90 but my question is to those who have had full out 3800 M90 builds and than swapped over to turbo for more power.

    Whats the low end power diff between the two and the take off speed diff which is quicker? I know turbos usually have more top end and superchargers are quick off the line but i just wanna here from first hand 3800 experiencers.

    Im just curious of the low end torque diff and the quickness diff between a supercharged and turbo 3800. I like that quickness off the line and or from a digg
    Not your average grocery getter, but theres always at least two things on the list.... 10w-30 Castrol Titanium and Shell 91 premium mixed with a lil 100 octane racing gas......
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    Regal GS Level Member BoostedPontiac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Haven, MI
    Posts
    1,140
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I noticed a bit of a low end difference. So I upped timing down low and installed a anti-lag. Problem solved.
    98' GP coupe NIC Pacesetters, E85, FSIC, 2.6, heads, blah
    11.82 @ 118.4 with a 1.8 60ft
    Retired: 99' Regal GS Turbo 11.428 @ 122.61 1.7 60ft.
    Retired: 99 GTP top swap nic setup. 13.37@106
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    GrandPrix Junkie ItHurtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Antioch, IL
    Posts
    3,524
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    17
    Dislikes (Received)
    2
    I didnt have a fully built m90, 3.4 and the support mods then went to turbo. Low end sucks balls cant even squeal off the line. After your done crying for 1.1 seconds of no low end it goes M90 what?
    2000 GTPT Sold-brandonhall10 built trans
    2009 Challenger SRT8
    http://www.grandprixforums.net/threa...uestion.....no
    Expert at being gay.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    I live here. stealthee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    SWPA
    Posts
    8,782
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I've never been in a turbo 3800 but have owned, driven, been a passenger, etc in several turbo cars. I'll tell you like I've told numerous other people is that turbo lag is overstated.


    2011 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS - DD mode
    1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT - Many mods to come
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    GrandPrix Junkie CrazyGuy03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    3,868
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Twincharged / CSC not in your list ?
    2003 Buick Regal GSX lots of mods - click here to see latest build - http://www.grandprixforums.net/threa...ld-for-the-gsx

    *For Reference - Does not have a Zack Howard Cam - It's an Intense Stage 3 - Thank You*
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    GrandPrix Junkie SgtMarshal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kemmerer, Wyoming
    Posts
    4,703
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Received)
    25
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I had a 2.8 pulley on my GTP with ported L32 heads, xp cam, full size intercooler and a built transmission. the bottom end on the xp cam wasn't that great. I would guess the car was making about 350 hp at the wheels, and it wasn't enough. I have a turbo to put on and expect the powerband to be much better.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    GrandPrix Junkie ItHurtz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Antioch, IL
    Posts
    3,524
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    17
    Dislikes (Received)
    2
    you wont ever turbo, exit the thread n/a low comp guy!
    2000 GTPT Sold-brandonhall10 built trans
    2009 Challenger SRT8
    http://www.grandprixforums.net/threa...uestion.....no
    Expert at being gay.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    Regal GS Level Member BoostedPontiac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Haven, MI
    Posts
    1,140
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    As someone who went from a supercharger to a turbo with an xp cam I can tell you the powerbandis awesome now lol.
    98' GP coupe NIC Pacesetters, E85, FSIC, 2.6, heads, blah
    11.82 @ 118.4 with a 1.8 60ft
    Retired: 99' Regal GS Turbo 11.428 @ 122.61 1.7 60ft.
    Retired: 99 GTP top swap nic setup. 13.37@106
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    GrandPrix Junkie SgtMarshal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kemmerer, Wyoming
    Posts
    4,703
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Received)
    25
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I think I'm going to start the install next week. hopefully it wont take too long.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    GrandPrix Junkie SgtMarshal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kemmerer, Wyoming
    Posts
    4,703
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Received)
    25
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BoostedPontiac View Post
    As someone who went from a supercharger to a turbo with an xp cam I can tell you the powerbandis awesome now lol.
    that's what im hoping for
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    GXP Level Member GTPpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Schuyler, NE
    Posts
    2,972
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    23
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It's going to depend on what turbo you go with, and quite a few other aspects.

    A turbo will not have the instant response the m90 does. You can set up an antilag to help, or brake boost, but you aren't going to sit at idle and have boost at an instant.


    2001 GTP Drag Car - XPZ, Tischler heads, Upsidedown M90 IC'd, e85, Gen V, 2.3 w/ 5%OD
    2005 F350 6.0 - studded, deleted, tuned
    2001 GTP - cam, headers, nitrous, stock trans - 11.83 @ 116 <$2k in mods - sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    GTP Level Member Dee23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    North Philly
    Posts
    908
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Thanx for the honest replies. I would love the power of a turbo but i cant deny the quickness of a supercharger at any given time. And the supercharger whine is just.........music to the ears
    Not your average grocery getter, but theres always at least two things on the list.... 10w-30 Castrol Titanium and Shell 91 premium mixed with a lil 100 octane racing gas......
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    SE Level Member SlowFiero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    83
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    My turbo setup is quicker in every way at the track. 60' dropped from best of 1.54 to best of 1.42, and consistent 1.4x.

    On the street, full boost is achieved in under one second, not m90 instant, but it is so much quicker once it hits, it doesn't really matter.

    I sized everything for good response, so 6262 turbo and ST1 cam, if you use a bigger turbo and oversized cam for the engine, the response will be slower.
    Billet 6262 T3 turbo, PT1001 intercooler, ST1 cam, 140 springs, pushrods, N* TB, L26 upper, HV3, otherwise stock L32. 10.007 @ 135.54with 1.46 60' 3130 lbs

    Old GenV M90, XP, heads, N* TB, ST2 intercooler - 11.425@115.60 1.54 60'
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    I break stuff selliott's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    1,313
    Thanks (Received)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    10
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The m90 may be slightly faster off the line but it will never have the butt pucker factor of the turbo when it spools up.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    Donating Users 16MustangVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sh1t hole Afghanistan Currently
    Posts
    5,418
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SlowFiero View Post
    My turbo setup is quicker in every way at the track. 60' dropped from best of 1.54 to best of 1.42, and consistent 1.4x.

    On the street, full boost is achieved in under one second, not m90 instant, but it is so much quicker once it hits, it doesn't really matter.

    I sized everything for good response, so 6262 turbo and ST1 cam, if you use a bigger turbo and oversized cam for the engine, the response will be slower.
    holy hell 20mph gain on the big end according to your sig.......

    welp nothing more needs to be discussed in this thread lol!
    How I treat my car: wreck,fix, repeat.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    SE Level Member SlowFiero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    83
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    It now does the same mph at the 1/8th that it did with the m90/1.9 rocker setup that I ran the first time in the 1/4 mile, 106mph lol.

    Turbo setup has been 137.x mph, with a slower ET.
    Billet 6262 T3 turbo, PT1001 intercooler, ST1 cam, 140 springs, pushrods, N* TB, L26 upper, HV3, otherwise stock L32. 10.007 @ 135.54with 1.46 60' 3130 lbs

    Old GenV M90, XP, heads, N* TB, ST2 intercooler - 11.425@115.60 1.54 60'
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    GrandPrix Junkie SgtMarshal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Kemmerer, Wyoming
    Posts
    4,703
    Thanks (Received)
    10
    Likes (Received)
    25
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    the technology that Eaton used when they designed the M90 was from the mid 90's, and turbo technology has come so far since then. with compressor maps all the different nozzle's available you have so many options that can dramatically reduce spool time while still making decent power. I saw a guy who twin turboed a 3800 engine in a sand rail with 30mm turbos, and that thing only made 300 hp, but it made that power at like 2000 rpms.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    GXP Level Member Turbocharged400sbc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    hangover park IL
    Posts
    2,714
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    11
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    With the 3800's best Muffler being a turbocharger.... the choice is plainly obvious for the best exhaust sound.

    The small 54 millimeter turbo on a buddy's Bonneville is stupid insane fast light-off....exploding off the line that he can easily Burn Rubber with an L 36 and minimal "rubber banding"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    Turbo is the way to go. BillBoost37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    W Spfld
    Posts
    26,815
    Thanks (Received)
    53
    Likes (Received)
    90
    Dislikes (Received)
    1
    A turbo will typically be much nicer to your trans for daily driving etc.
    I drink..so consider that when reading my posts.

    2010 Audi A6 Dual IC's
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Supercharger vs turbo 
    SE Level Member SlowFiero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    83
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Not too sure about that, I'd run a 4340 input shaft for years with the m90, lasted a week on he street with the turbo before shattering. The 300m I replaced it with broke within 3 months of street use and two trips to the track. Killed 4 7/8" chains in that time too.
    Billet 6262 T3 turbo, PT1001 intercooler, ST1 cam, 140 springs, pushrods, N* TB, L26 upper, HV3, otherwise stock L32. 10.007 @ 135.54with 1.46 60' 3130 lbs

    Old GenV M90, XP, heads, N* TB, ST2 intercooler - 11.425@115.60 1.54 60'
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. conversion of a supercharger to a turbo
    By ricoswave in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-20-2013, 06:15 PM
  2. Supercharger vs. Turbo
    By Trevjar in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-06-2012, 02:39 PM
  3. Turbo And Supercharger?
    By erichamby in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 08-02-2011, 08:56 AM
  4. supercharger or turbo debate
    By 98bullit in forum Introductions/Noob Questions
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-30-2009, 12:51 PM
  5. turbo or supercharger
    By grandprixgt in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 04:04 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •