Thread: Mid range foot response

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21
  1. #1 Mid range foot response 
    SE Level Member themantis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    39
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    [1999 Grand Prix GTP] I have a 3" stainless steel Magnaflow exhaust, what should I plan on to improve mid range torque (xxxx-3700) and at 4200+ rpm my hp continuously falls slightly. Any suggestions?

    Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Mid range foot response 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    headers cam e85 little pulley, ic, pick one or all of em lol

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Mid range foot response 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,022
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    We make peak horsepower at 5000+ rpm, so if you are really losing horsepower past 4200, your motor isn't doing so hot.

    I bet you are just noticing the torque drop off as the rpm rise. 0-80ish on a stock vehicle is about they got, past that and it takes forever to gain speed.


    Headers move the power band slightly and the only real way to gain big torque is to add a camshaft and drop pulley sizes.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Mid range foot response 
    SE Level Member themantis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    39
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Fivefingerdeathpunch View Post
    We make peak horsepower at 5000+ rpm, so if you are really losing horsepower past 4200, your motor isn't doing so hot.

    I bet you are just noticing the torque drop off as the rpm rise. 0-80ish on a stock vehicle is about they got, past that and it takes forever to gain speed.


    Headers move the power band slightly and the only real way to gain big torque is to add a camshaft and drop pulley sizes.
    I'm at work atm, let me post the dyno results when I get home tonight. The only thing I remember positively is max torque occurred at 3900 (3rd gear). I just don't like having to rev to that to accelerate with any significance

    Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Mid range foot response 
    SE Level Member themantis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    39
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Scottydoggs View Post
    headers cam e85 little pulley, ic, pick one or all of em lol
    Exactly what I had planned. What do you mean by ic? And although it's largely opinion, is a cai a worthwhile consideration at this stage in building my car?

    Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Mid range foot response 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    intercooler after adding this second gear has a reason for life, aka it now pulls real hard in second gear.



    cai is about worthless, its good to hear the sc whine. may kill mph due to yo want to hear it whine lol

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Mid range foot response 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,022
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    This was my stock 2000 GTP dyno that I had done.

    Crappy picture but it still shows it's make power to 5200 rpm or so, I took this picture years ago and I don't remember if I have any others with a better print out.


    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Mid range foot response 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    give this a good read. tells you what order thing should be done and whats possible o run safely.


    http://www.grandprixforums.net/threa...00-Powered-Car!!

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Mid range foot response 
    SE Level Member themantis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    39
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Dyno results as of February 2016



    Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Mid range foot response 
    SE Level Member themantis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    39
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Scottydoggs View Post
    intercooler after adding this second gear has a reason for life, aka it now pulls real hard in second gear.



    cai is about worthless, its good to hear the sc whine. may kill mph due to yo want to hear it whine lol
    Intercooler, interesting. Everything I read about them said they created nothing but a whole new system the engine had to create pressure for, actually dropping power output. But maybe just top end. Cai is overrated

    Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Mid range foot response 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by themantis View Post
    Intercooler, interesting. Everything I read about them said they created nothing but a whole new system the engine had to create pressure for, actually dropping power output. But maybe just top end. Cai is overrated

    Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
    thats pretty false. its the only way to drop pulleys on pump gas.

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Mid range foot response 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,022
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Your dyno graph looks good, horsepower is on the rise to 5000+ rpm, just like normal.

    Your torque curve is the higher graphed lines.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Mid range foot response 
    SE Level Member themantis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    39
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Fivefingerdeathpunch View Post
    Your dyno graph looks good, horsepower is on the rise to 5000+ rpm, just like normal.

    Your torque curve is the higher graphed lines.
    Yeah sorry I was typing before without having the graph for reference. What I'm angry about is that I spent $1000 on that exhaust system to only raise horsepower by one . However I also realize that it was necessary to be able to support everything else I would do thereafter

    Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Mid range foot response 
    SE Level Member themantis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    39
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Scottydoggs View Post
    thats pretty false. its the only way to drop pulleys on pump gas.
    Good to know. What brand intercooler would you recommend? Also how do you feel about speed daddy headers, and how aggressive should I be with cams?

    Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Mid range foot response 
    Killa Bee Scottydoggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    39,927
    Thanks (Received)
    63
    Likes (Received)
    166
    Dislikes (Received)
    5
    this core. and you buy the rest of the kit elsewhere.

    his core is the only ic with fully working pcv. same one i got, and his lim as well. http://www.grandprixforums.net/threa...erCharger-3800

    a cam leads to a tranny rebuild in the future, im not cammed and never plan to, but a lot of guys like the XP

    sd headers are fine too. i run em, and so do a lot of others.

    98 Buick Regal GS, F body brakes, Caddy STS wheels, tinted tails L36 bottom end, lightly ported heads, 1.95 roller rockers, headers, gen 5 N* 3.0 pulley, FSIC, 42 lb injectors, a BrandonHall rebuilt trans, DHP tuned and AEM water/Meth injection https://goo.gl/gpV5kW
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Mid range foot response 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,022
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    The stock 2.25in catback exhaust can handle 300-350whp, that's basically why you didn't gain anything.

    And $1,000 just for a simple catback sounds way overpriced.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Mid range foot response 
    Turbo is the way to go. REDCRAPGP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Behind you...sike made you look Bish
    Posts
    16,085
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Fivefingerdeathpunch View Post
    The stock 2.25in catback exhaust can handle 300-350whp, that's basically why you didn't gain anything.

    And $1,000 just for a simple catback sounds way overpriced.
    This! If you paid anywhere need that price you paid way to much
    Squirrels are my engine. I need a Ford Regal
    04 Comp G.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Mid range foot response 
    SE Level Member themantis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    39
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yeah I know, that's why I was upset I got it. What I had before was burst seamed mufflers and rusted pipes through and through. It sounded absurdly loud, and look up 3" stainless steel Magnaflow catback. They are $1,000 online, but I had Tim's Custom Exhaust make parts specific to my car for $600 and labor to install for $400. High flow cat is on my wishlist along with matching downpipe, but I need power to make it worthwhile 😂 I was lied to when I bought my car, being told it already had 300 whp proven by dyno last year. That's why I figured the exhaust was plausible, because I thought I only had room for 50 hp more.
    Quote Originally Posted by Fivefingerdeathpunch View Post
    The stock 2.25in catback exhaust can handle 300-350whp, that's basically why you didn't gain anything.

    And $1,000 just for a simple catback sounds way overpriced.

    Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Mid range foot response 
    Turbo is the way to go. Fivefingerdeathpunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rogers, MN
    Posts
    21,022
    Thanks (Received)
    21
    Likes (Received)
    45
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    LOL, I didn't even catch the name of the dyno sheet at first. I took my car to DB performance for mine aswell, just 3-4 years ago. But I never went back after I did my mods and tuning the car myself.

    I live 3 miles from the shop here in Rogers.

    SMGPFC Member #1
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Mid range foot response 
    SE Level Member themantis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    39
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Fivefingerdeathpunch View Post
    LOL, I didn't even catch the name of the dyno sheet at first. I took my car to DB performance for mine aswell, just 3-4 years ago. But I never went back after I did my mods and tuning the car myself.

    I live 3 miles from the shop here in Rogers.
    I like what they have going on there, but I'll also admit I'm influenced by all their good reviews I'm 20 minutes from Rogers in Anoka

    Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Car won't start without me holding my foot on the gas
    By smilee in forum General Grand Prix Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-19-2016, 11:19 PM
  2. When I take my foot off the gas the RPMs shoot up and the car accelerate by itself
    By Jtiger360 in forum 3.8L V6 Naturally Aspirated (L36)(L26)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-19-2014, 02:38 AM
  3. Gruesome Foot! NWS (gore)
    By Preotic in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 01-22-2009, 06:09 AM
  4. whats a good 60 foot time?
    By Bogers99GTP in forum Off Topic Discussion
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 06-17-2008, 02:12 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •