Thread: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24
  1. #1 Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    GT Level Member SliceTheRice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    South Jordan, UT
    Posts
    336
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I know most people use fiberglass for visual benefits but how does the sound differ from wood? I'm looking to get a box and I really don't give a crap what it looks like, just how it sounds. Does one sound better than the other?

    Also I've noticed some sub boxes seal the subs independently from each other. Is there a benefit/con to that?

    Thanks for the help...

    2000 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP
    (3.4 MPS, DHP 1.0 tune, ZZP Plog & 3" DP, 2.5" cat-back exhaust, resonator delete, AL104 plugs, 180* T-stat, Falken Ziex 245/45/18 tires)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    detroit mi
    Posts
    17
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    honestly, it all depends on the sub. Each sub comes with a user manual and in the manual it says the type of box the manufacture recomends for best sound quality.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    GT Level Member SliceTheRice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    South Jordan, UT
    Posts
    336
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    What would you say is most common?

    2000 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP
    (3.4 MPS, DHP 1.0 tune, ZZP Plog & 3" DP, 2.5" cat-back exhaust, resonator delete, AL104 plugs, 180* T-stat, Falken Ziex 245/45/18 tires)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    EX GTP OWNER shawngtp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Grand haven
    Posts
    1,300
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Send me your bumper son!!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    GT Level Member SliceTheRice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    South Jordan, UT
    Posts
    336
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0



    2000 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP
    (3.4 MPS, DHP 1.0 tune, ZZP Plog & 3" DP, 2.5" cat-back exhaust, resonator delete, AL104 plugs, 180* T-stat, Falken Ziex 245/45/18 tires)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    GT Level Member papaspanky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    new england
    Posts
    276
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    MDF (medium density fiberboard) is by far the most common material used to build sub boxes. (if a box is made of wood/particle board it will not last long) and will always be less expensive than fiberglass. as for a difference in sound if the box has the right dimensions for the sub installed in it and is correctly assembeled the human ear will never detect the difference.actually most fiberglass boxes are built around an mdf frame. as for the subs being separated in the same box it is mostly done to keep the resonances from the speakers separated because no two speakers are exactly the same.it will be a lot easier to tell if you have a problem with one of the speakers.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    That Loud Guy 1LoudGrandPrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    1,114
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    mines made of mdf and it just has resin inside... thats only to make the most out of every watt(for comps)
    98 Camaro SS 46k LS1, T56, All Stock. 00 GMC Sierra 2wd ECSB 106k Lm7, 3.73s tow needs lowered..
    01 Grand Prix GTP "201k" ~111k on motor, ~46k on trans, headers, 3.4 and a tune to come.
    01 Grand Prix GT 168k: Mods: Tune by TheOtherNick. Stereo: 320A alt,4 runs 0/1, XS D3400 front, 1 JYP 80ah Lithium rear, 2 Twisted Sounds 3500s, 2 Sundown Audio NightShade v.3 7 National Records..

    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You want the most rigid box possible.

    Just happens that building it out of MDF and re-enforcing it with MDF bracing makes it strong.

    Heres an example of what I call well re-enforced:



    That sub is a beast... LMS 5400 18... Only multiples.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    Audio Moderator I800C0LLECT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,183
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    sometimes...I really don't want to know the face behind the name
    11 is louder than 10!
    Audio Build Logs: DIYMA and GPONA
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    resident snitch gtpinsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    sumter,south carolina
    Posts
    6,432
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    i dont think thats matt lol

    02 GTP with mods 05 GP for DD
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperSport View Post
    The majority of the people here are potheads who want to buy good condition parts at junkyard prices.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    No that really isnt me.

    That guy IS insane though:

    [IMG][/IMG]

    Heres another picture without that guy in it lol:

    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Grand Blanc, MI
    Posts
    58
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Lets just put it this way since I've built dozens of both. If you don't know what your doing in fiberglass don't waste your time. You have to know how to properly mix, size, frame, wrap, bondo, sand, paint etc... I used fiberglass for clients wanting to put subs in odd places. If your just starting out and don't care what a box looks like dont waste your time!! The thing to remember is the box is what makes the sub. If your box is flimsy or not built to spec (internal volume, port size/length etc) your sub is not going to be at its potential.
    Building a rigid fiberglass enclosure is not easy to do. And measuring its internal volume is even harder. Building a box out of MDF and calculating its internal volume to match the specs is very easy to do. Just make sure its at least 3/4" MDF. Originally I started by fiberglassing the inside of my boxes but since I used to compete with small sealed enclosures it didn't make much of a difference. So from then on I just sealed everything with liquid nails as I built and then coated the inside with spray on bedliner.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You could use some nice oak instead... Even more rigid.

    If you just use carpenters glue then line all the corners with silicone its guaranteed to be sealed.

    Just dont put in the woofer till the silicone has cured. The fumes apparently eat foam surrounds.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    287
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yanno I could be wrong but I swear that looks like plywood and not MDF.

    MDF (which is in the particle board category) works best because it is most dense. Wood would last just as long it simply produces more noise and a cabinet\enclosure should not produce noise.

    Some of the best enclosures I have seen where made from either 1" thick MDF or concrete.

    The concrete ones were not in a car...... I wouldn't recommend it.
    Last edited by MrTube; 08-01-2010 at 08:49 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Plywood works just as well, its lighter and more expensive though.

    Typically only used by guys with deep pockets in home audio since they can afford it and like the one side veneer stuff so they dont have to do that themselves.

    Just assemble, stain, enjoy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    287
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Matt: plywood was commonly used in the 50s and early 60s.. companies switched to MDF because it was denser. a 1/2" thick MDF box will produce less noise then an equally built 1/2" plywood box.

    This is why you never see plywood cabinets on ANY house speakers, especially expensive ones. I assure you they can afford plywood on a pair of $5-30K speakers. They all use MDF or HDF board.

    I'm not sure where you have seen quality home enclosures made from plywood. Have articles? Only cabinets I know made from plywood are commercial\PA cabinets. And its because they are durable when it comes to abuse. Not sound quality.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Density is not what you're after, its rigidity.

    More resistance to flexing the less colouration you will get from the box.

    I used to be on AVSforum.com but they're all pretty insane over there.

    Its either overkill with the subs and no speakers that can keep up with them or waste of time sub builds.

    Hardly ever does anyone build their own speakers from scratch anymore. They just use someone elses design, have a cabinet maker build the box for them and they install the drivers and wire it up.

    Wheres the fun in that?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Grand Blanc, MI
    Posts
    58
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by matt5112 View Post
    Density is not what you're after, its rigidity.
    Actually you want both.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Yeah that makes sense.

    But the most common issue is rigidity.

    If it vibrates, then who cares how dense it is?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: Fiberglass VS. Wooden Sub Boxes 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Grand Blanc, MI
    Posts
    58
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by matt5112 View Post
    Yeah that makes sense.

    But the most common issue is rigidity.

    If it vibrates, then who cares how dense it is?
    I think you just answered your own question....kinda.. If its not rigid it will flex. But if its not dense, sound can pass through it very easily. MDF is both dense and rigid (and cheap) which is why its usually the material of choice.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. installs and boxes built (unkind to 56k, pic heavy)
    By s1795so2 in forum Audio, Security & Visual Electronics
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 02-17-2008, 08:13 PM
  2. fiberglass
    By Chleby in forum Audio, Security & Visual Electronics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-11-2008, 10:23 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •