Thread: Range active fuel management disable device

Results 1 to 20 of 89

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 Re: Range active fuel management disable device 
    GXP Level Member 91parkave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    2,930
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    U bend was not gone on ls4 vehicles. We all had the stupid u bend.

    And the factory exhaust is garbage, toss that **** to. Unlike our 3800 bastard relatives , we have gains to be had and sound from exhaust modifications. Also if your gonna blow 200 just buy a Diablo tuner and and use that instead to turn off dod as well as have the ability to upload tunes to your vehicle.
    06 GXP | 222/227 cam/cartuning turbo kit on 8psi/meth/e85 coilovers/ still on stock trans at 130k
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Range active fuel management disable device 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    140
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 91parkave View Post
    U bend was not gone on ls4 vehicles. We all had the stupid u bend.

    And the factory exhaust is garbage, toss that **** to. Unlike our 3800 bastard relatives , we have gains to be had and sound from exhaust modifications. Also if your gonna blow 200 just buy a Diablo tuner and and use that instead to turn off dod as well as have the ability to upload tunes to your vehicle.

    Garbage in the sense that its mild steel, rusts and falls apart after a couple of years, and is a 2.5" system that turns into a 1 7/8" system at the mufflers. Are there gains to be had replacing the catback alone? Sure, alot of gains? Not as much as everyone seems to think. The real problems with the LS4 exhaust are up front. I am looking into the walker/dynomax super turbo direct fit mufflers for our cars, and ill probably replace that entire catback soon enough as my mufflers are beginning to rust out, found a dime size hole in the drivers side last week and its not long before the intermediate pipe begins to rot through, its completely rusted solid.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Range active fuel management disable device 
    GXP Level Member 91parkave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    2,930
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Spawne32 View Post
    Garbage in the sense that its mild steel, rusts and falls apart after a couple of years, and is a 2.5" system that turns into a 1 7/8" system at the mufflers. Are there gains to be had replacing the catback alone? Sure, alot of gains? Not as much as everyone seems to think. The real problems with the LS4 exhaust are up front. I am looking into the walker/dynomax super turbo direct fit mufflers for our cars, and ill probably replace that entire catback soon enough as my mufflers are beginning to rust out, found a dime size hole in the drivers side last week and its not long before the intermediate pipe begins to rot through, its completely rusted solid.
    Why don't you just do it right and get the premade 3inch system from Mandrelexhaustsystems.com and fit mufflers and call it done
    06 GXP | 222/227 cam/cartuning turbo kit on 8psi/meth/e85 coilovers/ still on stock trans at 130k
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Range active fuel management disable device 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    140
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 91parkave View Post
    Why don't you just do it right and get the premade 3inch system from Mandrelexhaustsystems.com and fit mufflers and call it done
    thats exactly what im talking about, its a trubendz exhaust kit, but it doesnt come with mufflers or resonators, just pipes clamps and hangars.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Range active fuel management disable device 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    140
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    TRUBENDZ 04-08 Pontiac Grand Prix Dual Exhaust Tubing System $170.00
    WALKER 17666 Dynomax Super Turbo Direct Fit Muffler RIGHT $69.99
    WALKER 17667 Dynomax Super Turbo Direct Fit Muffler LEFT $69.99
    WALKER 21569 Exhaust Resonator and Pipe Assembly $42.79

    all of those are the 2.5" pieces, including the OEM replacement resonator assembly.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Range active fuel management disable device 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Enfield
    Posts
    422
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Spawne32 View Post
    TRUBENDZ 04-08 Pontiac Grand Prix Dual Exhaust Tubing System $170.00
    WALKER 17666 Dynomax Super Turbo Direct Fit Muffler RIGHT $69.99
    WALKER 17667 Dynomax Super Turbo Direct Fit Muffler LEFT $69.99
    WALKER 21569 Exhaust Resonator and Pipe Assembly $42.79

    all of those are the 2.5" pieces, including the OEM replacement resonator assembly.
    That is too expensive in my opinion for mufflers that are not fully welded. I have used Dynomax in the past, the sound is decent with a bit of a nice growl, but they dont last as they end up leaking at the seems. As we discussed before also in my opinion 2 1/2 is too small for our cars, but get what suits you.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Range active fuel management disable device 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    140
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rottonj View Post
    That is too expensive in my opinion for mufflers that are not fully welded. I have used Dynomax in the past, the sound is decent with a bit of a nice growl, but they dont last as they end up leaking at the seems. As we discussed before also in my opinion 2 1/2 is too small for our cars, but get what suits you.
    I'd happily buy a 3" exhaust, if you could prove to me that there is a gain by going to a 3" over a 2.5" dual. lol
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Range active fuel management disable device 
    GT Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Enfield
    Posts
    422
    Thanks (Received)
    3
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Spawne32 View Post
    I'd happily buy a 3" exhaust, if you could prove to me that there is a gain by going to a 3" over a 2.5" dual. lol
    Be stubborn , I cant provide it other than stating I have used 3 inch exhaust systems in the past on cars with one main section pipe with seat of pants gains. I can tell you going 2 1/2 will net you nothing as its what is there already except for the smaller tail section. Whatever you choose I would include some brand of welded mufflers if you want it to last awhile.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Range active fuel management disable device 
    I live here. stealthee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    SWPA
    Posts
    8,782
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 91parkave View Post
    U bend was not gone on ls4 vehicles. We all had the stupid u bend.
    That's dumb. Why get rid of it on the 3800 and bring it back for the LS4?


    2011 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS - DD mode
    1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT - Many mods to come
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Bad to disable torque management?
    By 97AutoXVette in forum PCM Tuning
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 03-17-2017, 04:38 PM
  2. Anyone added fuel capacity for extra range?
    By bobc455 in forum 04+ Specifics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-09-2015, 10:45 AM
  3. Torque management
    By apierce1289 in forum PCM Tuning
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-02-2013, 12:43 PM
  4. Low range ding sound disable?
    By aeidian in forum Audio, Security & Visual Electronics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-06-2013, 09:51 AM
  5. Torque management What is it?
    By JoshsGTP in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-27-2010, 08:21 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •