Thread: NIC cam + rockers

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 38
  1. #1 NIC cam + rockers 
    Regal GS Level Member BoostedPontiac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South Haven, MI
    Posts
    1,140
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Im currently running a NIC cam on the stock 1.6 ratio rockers. Im planning on upgrading to 1.7 because that will take my lift up without maxing out the stock heads. My question is, is it worth it? Or would I lose too much boost?
    98' GP coupe NIC Pacesetters, E85, FSIC, 2.6, heads, blah
    11.82 @ 118.4 with a 1.8 60ft
    Retired: 99' Regal GS Turbo 11.428 @ 122.61 1.7 60ft.
    Retired: 99 GTP top swap nic setup. 13.37@106
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GXP Level Member darkhorizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    flintnasty MI
    Posts
    2,596
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    You would lose power and lift going to 1.7 rollers.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GXP Level Member coolone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,374
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    NIC cam... .317 lift.317x1.6=.507
    .317x1.7=.539


    Ummmmmmm, how is that losing lift? I'm just curious...


    OP, I wouldn't do that on stock valve springs and retainers either, it wouldn't be such a good idea.
    Overkill BBC Cam, YT 1.8 RR's, Rhodes Lifters, STGII Heads, GenV, Pacesetters, 3" Exh to Tips, TEP Trans. N*, ID 75# injectors/E85 coming soon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    The Boss Iceman6669's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    7,488
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    38
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Because there is some debate that with stock rockers on aftermarket cams the contact point changes and the ratio actually increases beyond 1.66
    97 GTP Sold-prolly rusted away by now
    2011 F-150 Yote powered
    Too Hot to Handle, Too Cold to Hold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GTP Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    513
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorizon View Post
    You would lose power and lift going to 1.7 rollers.
    have you actually set up a test to measure the lift at the valve with stock rockers to confirm your theory? and then with 1.7's to measure the "loss" that you speak of?
    - 2001 Grand Prix XGT -- 11.21@124MPH
    - 2010 Chevy 2500HD LTZ -- Car hauler
    - 2011 BMW 328i Xdrive -- Wife's Daily
    - 2014 Ford F250 crew cab -- 6.2 liters of ford fail
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GXP Level Member darkhorizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    flintnasty MI
    Posts
    2,596
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NebTurboST5 View Post
    have you actually set up a test to measure the lift at the valve with stock rockers to confirm your theory? and then with 1.7's to measure the "loss" that you speak of?
    yes, ive posted it before.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GT Level Member Overkill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Nanaimo British Columbia
    Posts
    244
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I can tell you that switching from stock rockers to CompCams 1.73 roller rockers on our SBC cam test car picked up just over 1mph in the 1/4 with no other changes. SBC uses the same CompCam lobes and lift as the ZZP NIC cam

    Email all inquiries to willoverkill@gmail.com!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GTP Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    513
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorizon View Post
    yes, ive posted it before.
    link? id like to read it.
    - 2001 Grand Prix XGT -- 11.21@124MPH
    - 2010 Chevy 2500HD LTZ -- Car hauler
    - 2011 BMW 328i Xdrive -- Wife's Daily
    - 2014 Ford F250 crew cab -- 6.2 liters of ford fail
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GXP Level Member darkhorizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    flintnasty MI
    Posts
    2,596
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Overkill View Post
    I can tell you that switching from stock rockers to CompCams 1.73 roller rockers on our SBC cam test car picked up just over 1mph in the 1/4 with no other changes. SBC uses the same CompCam lobes and lift as the ZZP NIC cam
    ive gained over 1 mph trap speed just because it was a little bit colder out or on closed loop cars, afr changes all the time... Super random and biased information.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #11 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GTP Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    513
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    wow...i will submit to the fact that the rocker ratio changes using the stock rockers and that you do get more peak lift. however, im not going to jump on the bandwagon that you are somehow going to loose power going to a roller rocker. more then just peak lift in the equation here. i love gerenic claims with no real data to prove them.
    - 2001 Grand Prix XGT -- 11.21@124MPH
    - 2010 Chevy 2500HD LTZ -- Car hauler
    - 2011 BMW 328i Xdrive -- Wife's Daily
    - 2014 Ford F250 crew cab -- 6.2 liters of ford fail
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #12 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    Donating Users 16MustangVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sh1t hole Afghanistan Currently
    Posts
    5,418
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    well after reading all 3 of the above i have to derail this thread a little more. i cant help but wonder if i should put some heavier springs in my s1x e85 car thats on stock rockers right now.

    reason i bring this up is ill admit i dont drive the car nice and once in a while the rpm seems to hang between shifts if im hard on it, like rolling off ramp to 85 mph interstate speeds or from a dead stop and smash it.

    im certain i have 105s in it now and ti retainers from when greg had the car. i havnt taken the vc off. now if i do switch the springs to 130s which i happen to have in the basement still use the same retainers and keeping stock rockers?

    also might as well do new seals and i hope i can leave the heads on the car. reason i bring this all up is the rpms acting goofy once in a while or "rev hang" make me leery about ever spraying the car either. which of course the zex kit is also just chillin in the basement too.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #13 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    Bastard Reptile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    3,459
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    My two cents here...and I know how Nick hates LS6 springs...but....
    I've ran them in every build I have, and I don't have any problems with them. No hangups, no valve float, nothing. I also keep my shift points at 6200 because I don't really see the need to raise them. There, I've said it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #14 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    Donating Users 16MustangVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sh1t hole Afghanistan Currently
    Posts
    5,418
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    no idea on mileage on them springs but could be cheap insurance down the road should the bottle ever happen. as for now i could just be nicer to my car....... lol
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #15 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GXP Level Member coolone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,374
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    3
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Iceman6669 View Post
    Because there is some debate that with stock rockers on aftermarket cams the contact point changes and the ratio actually increases beyond 1.66

    I remember reading a great debate on this, is why I asked... But geometry is... Well geometry! A ratio of 1.6 stock or roller, is still 1.6 based upon the pivot point. Unless the PIVOT point changes, the ratio remains the same, hence then why 1.7 or even higher "ratios". Based on the fulcrum and angular momentum. The valve isn't moving or changing its height or contact point, nor is the cam midstream.

    Now if in fact the rollers are somehow losing contact with the valve and creating float? I'd have to see it to believe it. Maybe at 7k rpm... Yes, I am a sceptic! If the rollers offer no benefit, then why roller/hydraulic lifters too? I have 1.8's set up on this engine build with Overkill's BBC cam I have going in and maybe, just maybe, if I ever have the time, I'd love to screw around and dyno it and swap out the rockers same day and dyno it again! : )
    Overkill BBC Cam, YT 1.8 RR's, Rhodes Lifters, STGII Heads, GenV, Pacesetters, 3" Exh to Tips, TEP Trans. N*, ID 75# injectors/E85 coming soon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #16 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GrandPrix Junkie CrazyGuy03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    3,868
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    This is exactly where Dark lost me. I was going to run my s1x with 1.8RRs and he insists i would lose power. I never figured out how or why (something about the roller tip having a variable contact point?) but scrapped the idea all together later on for a larger cam and stock rockers.
    The way Dark likes to give advice is like telling jokes and leaving out the punchlines ... Lmao!
    2003 Buick Regal GSX lots of mods - click here to see latest build - http://www.grandprixforums.net/threa...ld-for-the-gsx

    *For Reference - Does not have a Zack Howard Cam - It's an Intense Stage 3 - Thank You*
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #17 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GXP Level Member GTPpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Schuyler, NE
    Posts
    2,972
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    23
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by crazyguy03 View Post
    The way Dark likes to give advice is like telling jokes and leaving out the punchlines ... Lmao!



    Most solid info in this thread!!!!


    2001 GTP Drag Car - XPZ, Tischler heads, Upsidedown M90 IC'd, e85, Gen V, 2.3 w/ 5%OD
    2005 F350 6.0 - studded, deleted, tuned
    2001 GTP - cam, headers, nitrous, stock trans - 11.83 @ 116 <$2k in mods - sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #18 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GXP Level Member GTPpower's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Schuyler, NE
    Posts
    2,972
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Received)
    23
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    As far as I'm concerned, the only reason that anyone should switch to roller rockers, is to maintain correct valvetrain geometry. And, with that, you need adjustables. There is very little actual testing out there on this. I believe ZZP did some testing way back in the day, but documentation is limited.

    I was looking at running an ST5 cam, but I was wanting to switch to T&D shaft mount roller rockers. I was told they were 1.7 ratio, but when I recieved the rockers, they are only stamped with 1.6. So, as of now, ZZP is creating a custom cam with more lift to make up for it, but with the same duration. I may measure the difference in lift between stock rockers and roller 1.6's to see what the actual difference is, if it's not too difficult. I need to look at my heads first to see if it's possible anymore.

    I care very little about peak lift numbers, or peak power numbers for that matter. Your engine spends very little time in this area during a 1/4 mile pass. You are way better off working to increase airflow at lower lifts where your engine spends much more time. (And power across the band, instead of peak.)


    2001 GTP Drag Car - XPZ, Tischler heads, Upsidedown M90 IC'd, e85, Gen V, 2.3 w/ 5%OD
    2005 F350 6.0 - studded, deleted, tuned
    2001 GTP - cam, headers, nitrous, stock trans - 11.83 @ 116 <$2k in mods - sold
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #19 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    GTP Level Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    513
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    look who thinks hes a badass with fancy roller rockers....
    - 2001 Grand Prix XGT -- 11.21@124MPH
    - 2010 Chevy 2500HD LTZ -- Car hauler
    - 2011 BMW 328i Xdrive -- Wife's Daily
    - 2014 Ford F250 crew cab -- 6.2 liters of ford fail
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #20 Re: NIC cam + rockers 
    Donating Users 16MustangVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sh1t hole Afghanistan Currently
    Posts
    5,418
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by GTPpower View Post

    I care very little about peak lift numbers, or peak power numbers for that matter. Your engine spends very little time in this area during a 1/4 mile pass. You are way better off working to increase airflow at lower lifts where your engine spends much more time. (And power across the band, instead of peak.)
    This makes wayyy to much sense for a forum like this....... Better stop before you confuse people LOL!
    Last edited by blueguy; 03-20-2015 at 05:18 PM. Reason: so the quote was actually quoted
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. HARLAND SHARP 1.7ROLLER ROCKERS AND 1.9 modded rockers
    By comp prix in forum For Sale - Parts
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-02-2014, 11:33 PM
  2. WTB: ZZP ER Rockers
    By Ibanezz in forum Wanted To Buy - Parts
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-03-2013, 06:59 PM
  3. Best 1.7 rockers for a VS cam
    By GOTIT4CHEAP16 in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-16-2012, 09:54 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •