Thread: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. #21 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bio248 View Post
    most likely you'd chip a piston before bending a rod. just about every time.
    Cheap ****ty pistons that have seen KR for years are going to be weak as hell.

    Also, apparently L36 rod bolts like to let go from time to time. It's a fun time, when you're spinning into the mid 6's on a stock bottom end.

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbocharged400sbc View Post
    if ya want more compression from the 67/32 then just use two layers of the MLS HG and bump it up .4
    Mmm, all that quench.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    I live here. Slick2500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
    Posts
    7,464
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sseilmnop View Post
    L32 L67 blocks are hard to find. They also want stupid money for blocks with 150,000


    I put in a L26 block.
    Here they want $700 for a 170k mile l67, $600 for pretty much any l36, l32s are pretty much non existent, and l26s are at most $400 with less than 100k

    Sent from A Galaxy Far Far Away........
    2003 Redfire Metallic Chevy Tahoe Z71 - Airaid Modular Intake Tube, Flowmaster Exhaust.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Sunfire Guy
    Superchargers take away horsepower
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    GXP Level Member Turbocharged400sbc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    hangover park IL
    Posts
    2,714
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    11
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    my last few engines have all been 150$ scores from burn victims with mostly intact valvecovers.

    junkyards assume they are junk, and if you dont mind itchy arms for a day or two you can get a damn good shortblock for a damn good price. as long as you know what yer looking fer.

    granted up here in the rust belt we have plenty of good powertrains with rotten shells, down south you have clean shells with junk powertrains.
    ~James~ Psychotic Gearhead
    projects: 84 Cressida waGN~ 90 LN3 3800, equal length headers, T70, 89 700r4, misc parts,
    1994 Oldsmobile 442 (462ci-4wd-2 engines) L67/4t80e^2,
    00 Turbo Regal 608 fwhp 575ftlbs at 5500rpm, 98 WhippledRiv, 97 GTP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    GTP Level Member Impala131's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    709
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbocharged400sbc View Post
    my last few engines have all been 150$ scores from burn victims with mostly intact valvecovers.

    junkyards assume they are junk, and if you dont mind itchy arms for a day or two you can get a damn good shortblock for a damn good price. as long as you know what yer looking fer.

    granted up here in the rust belt we have plenty of good powertrains with rotten shells, down south you have clean shells with junk powertrains.
    True, although, consider the transmissions in all areas. Probably a lot of great 3800 motors that got junked with a car that had a crummy 4T65e.
    2003 Grand Prix GTP.... the journey begins again....
    E85 Self Tune with HPT, 80# Injectors, Gen V 3.4 pulley, SD Headers, AL605 Plugs
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25 Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    LaBarge Supercharged sseilmnop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Mercer, Pa
    Posts
    1,766
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    9
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    People have been top swapping L36 and L26 for years. They work, they are plentiful, they are Cheap, and they have low miles.

    If you got the money to spend get a L67 L32 or better yet get a RWD car with a V8 stick and all the things we aren't.
    Adapters, Phenolic Intercoolers, Supercharger Parts & TVS2300
    http://stores.ebay.com/QualitySuperchargers
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I'd still avoid the L26 like someone with the clap.

    No thanks.

    Get an L36, all day long.
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    LaBarge Supercharged sseilmnop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Mercer, Pa
    Posts
    1,766
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    9
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blueguy View Post
    I'd still avoid the L26 like someone with the clap.

    No thanks.

    Get an L36, all day long.
    I have L26 for 2 years now.

    Do you have first hand experience or just what you heard?
    Adapters, Phenolic Intercoolers, Supercharger Parts & TVS2300
    http://stores.ebay.com/QualitySuperchargers
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #28 Re: Boosting High Compression vs Low Compression M90 Setup 
    GXP Level Member Turbocharged400sbc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    hangover park IL
    Posts
    2,714
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Received)
    11
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    l26 would be fine but realize that they are more hit and miss than the older l36. the tooling was wearing out. main galley alagnment from both ends of the block suffers greatly the newer the motor build date. its one reason all the die casting dies were reworked for sand casting...cheaper than repairing the production die casting machinery.

    if ya were goin to sub 2.8 territory with a chance at spraying it id shoot for a cast rod l36....ive seen enough l26 carnage to know that i really dont wanna push one more than a nice mild DD setup.

    i dunno 'bout yew...but i dont like the idea of PM rods that are designed to fracture....with a lovely chicken neck beam that'll snap if you look at it wrong....
    ~James~ Psychotic Gearhead
    projects: 84 Cressida waGN~ 90 LN3 3800, equal length headers, T70, 89 700r4, misc parts,
    1994 Oldsmobile 442 (462ci-4wd-2 engines) L67/4t80e^2,
    00 Turbo Regal 608 fwhp 575ftlbs at 5500rpm, 98 WhippledRiv, 97 GTP
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. low compression on number 5
    By chrisferguson84 in forum 5.3L V8 (LS4)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-04-2014, 06:15 PM
  2. No compression
    By carbon in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-22-2011, 09:12 PM
  3. high compression, low boost. lower compression, higher boost
    By BlackGT97 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-25-2011, 11:52 AM
  4. Bad Compression?
    By comongoose in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-24-2009, 01:22 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •